A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

may 18, 1976

The Lake County Board of County Commissioners convened in regular session on Tuesday, May 18, 1976, in the Commissioners’ Room, Courthouse, Tavares, Florida, at 9:00 A.M.  Present were:  Thomas J. Windram, Chairman; C.A. Deems, Glenn Burhans, J.M. Hoskinson and James R. Carson, Jr.  Others present were:  James Watkins, Clerk; Christopher C. Ford, County Attorney; and Andrea Gambrell, Deputy Clerk.

The Invocation was given by James C. Watkins and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by C.A. Deems.

county property

Commr. Burhans brought to the attention of the Board the condition of the parking lot being used by the County employees located on the west side of the Courthouse.  Discussion was held.  The Board requested the Clerk notify the Engineering Department to grade this lot and fill it with sand and clay.

bonds

On a motion by Commr. Burhans, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried, the following Contractor Bonds were approved:

1241-76           Kenneth W. Bliss dba Residential Contractor

1425-76           John C. Davis dba ARC Electrical Co.

1426-76           Robert H. Evans Residental

Commr. Hoskinson was absent for the vote.

accounts allowed

On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Burhans and carried unanimously, the Board approved purchase of a calculator to be charged to the Circuit Court budget at a cost of $395 and an IBM typewriter to be charged to the County Court budget at a cost of $650.

schools-misc.

On a motion by Commr. Burhans, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the Board approved the request from the Eustis Boosters for 70 to 100 yards of dirt to complete the Eustis Stadium.

hospitals

On a motion by Commr. Burhans, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the Board approved the admission of Henry Davis to the A.G. Holley State Hospital.

resolutions

On a motion by Commr. Burhans, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the Board adopted a resolution, as suggested by the State Auditors, establishing the fees that will be charged to those who must participate in the DWI School.

communications

The Clerk presented to the Board a letter from Mr. Peter F. Keelin requesting from the County funds to begin a Nutrition Program for Lake County.  Discussion was held regarding the lack of excess money in this year’s budget.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried unanimously, the Board denied the request for funds due to the tight budget year and requested the Clerk notify Mr. Keelin of the Board’s decision.

courthouse

Mr. Watkins presented to the Board suggestions for the parking lot landscaping around the existing Courthouse.  The placement of grass and/or shrubs were discussed.  The Board requested the Clerk obtain quotations on the placement of shrubs along with rock covering for this project and report back to the Board with this information.

licenses and permits

On a motion by Commr. Hoskinson, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the Board approved the gun permit application and $500 bond for Louis Range.

On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Burhans and carried unanimously, the Board approved the gun permit for Dick Jelsma subject to the proper bond being submitted to the Board of County Commissioners.

ordinances

At 9:30 A.M. the Chairman announced that the advertised time had arrived for the Board to consider an Ordinance amending the Lake County Zoning Ordinance 71-6.

The Clerk stated that proof of publication had been received and the title of the Ordinance is as follows:

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY DELETING FROM SECTION 60.15 – USES PERMITTED UPON SITE PLAN APPROVAL (a) GROVE CARETAKING AND MAINTENANCE BUSINESS. (b) CITRUS AND PRODUCE TRANSPORTING OPERATION.  (c) FISHING RESORTS, WITHOUT HOUSING OTHER THAN OWNER OR OPERATOR, AND TO INCLUDE MARINAS; CHANGING SECTION 60.150 (d) TO READ 60.150 (a) AND ADDING SAME AS (y), (z) AND (aa) UNDER SECTION 60.16 – USES PERMITTED ONLY AFTER CONDITIONAL

USE PERMIT.

On a motion by Comrm. Deems, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the Board placed the above Ordinance on its first and only reading by title only.

On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Deems and carried unanimously, the Board adopted the above Ordinance on its first and only reading by title only.

salaries

Mr. Watkins stated that authorities from the Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division had spoken with him regarding the policy the County and the Clerk have followed in giving employees compensation time when the employee works beyond the normal working hours.  Mr. Watkins informed the Board that he had been told by a representative from the Department of Labor that if an employee works overtime the employee may take these hours off in compensation time provided it is taken within the week the extra work hours were incurred, if not, the employee must be paid for his or her overtime.

Mr. Watkins stated that it has been determined that the County owes $98.89 in overtime wages to certain employees.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried unanimously, the Board approved the payment of overtime wages to those employees as designated by the Wage and Hour Authorities.

Mr. Watkins also suggested that there be a meeting with the Supervisors informing them of this development.  This met with the approval of the Board.

municipalities

Mr. Henry Sheldon, Consulting Engineer for the City of Leesburg’s 201 Plan and associated with Black, Crow and Eidsness, Inc., appeared before the Board and made a slide presentation briefly showing the Board members the research that has been spent on planning Leesburg’s 201 Facility Plan.

At the end of his presentation, Mr. Sheldon spoke to the Board requesting the County to commit itself to 6.2 million dollars to cover the cost in providing service to residents in the unincorporated areas near Leesburg.

The Board was concerned as to whether or not the Board would be able to withdraw its commitment if it decided that the County would not want to participate, the fact that if the County assisted Leesburg in this type of plan it would be obligated to assist other municipalities in their plan.  The Board members were concerned that they would have to make a decision about the matter by July 3, 1976 but do not feel that such a decision should be made without detailed discussion which could not be held at this time because of previously scheduled appointments.

It was suggested that Commr. Hoskinson, Commr. Carson, Michael Willett, Director of Planning; Bill Hennessey, Director of Pollution Control and Christopher Ford, County Attorney meet the various representatives from the City of Leesburg and its consulting firm regarding this request and that the Board would hold a special meeting on June 25, 1976 at 1:30 P.M. to take formal action on the request.

appropriations

Mr. Van Porter, Special Assistant, introduced Mrs. Chris Rubinas involved with CETA who would discuss with the Board a proposed Comprehensive Manpower Plan.

Mrs. Rubinas reviewed with the Board members the various CETA titles and the ways in which the County is presently handling its various programs under CETA.

Discussion was held on the advantage of having a central Manpower office handling all CETA Programs as well as the initial expense in establishing such a department and the changes that would take place in the County’s responsibility of the allocation of funds should such a department be created.

Mr. Glyn Faircloth from the Florida State Unemployment Service appeared before the Board and stated that the presentation was well prepared, however, the CETA programs as they are presently handled do not cost the taxpayers nor the County additional funds because they are handled and executed through departments that have always existed and will probably continue to exist such as the Division of Youth Services and the Florida State Unemployment Service.

Mr. Faircloth stated that due to the fact that the programs are running smoothly it would not be a wise decision to change it at this time.

The Board thanked Mrs. Rubinas for her presentation and stated that this proposal would have to be discussed and that they would contact her when a formal decision was made.

recess and reassembly

At 12:00 Noon the Chairman announced that the Board would adjourn for lunch at the Silver Lake Golf and Country Club.  The public and press were invited on a dutch treat basis.

county employees

Mr. Porter, Special Assistant, stated that he had received a request from Larry Morey, Acting Public Works Director to employ a substitute sign installer at a salary of $5,400 to assist in the work load due to the absence of the regular County Employee, Bill Thompson.  On a motion by Commr. Deems, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried unanimously, the above request was approved effective immediately.

accounts allowed

On a motion by Commr. Deems, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the Board approved travel for Harry Spooner, CETA Coordinator to attend a meeting in Williston on Thursday, May 20, 1976.

public health

Commr. Windram presented to the Board a progress report from Doctor June Murray regarding the various programs conducted by the Lake County Health Department.  Commr. Windram stated that Dr. Murray wanted to know if each Commissioner would like to receive a monthly report.  This met with the approval of the Board.  The Clerk was requested to inform Dr. Murray of the above and request that these reports be delivered to the Board of County Commissioners Office.

county materials

Commr. Deems brought to the attention of the Board that he noticed on the monthly surplus property reports that Leesburg was purchasing paint from Starke.  Commr. Deems suggested that the County investigate this to see if the paint is usable and if it is, take advantage of the opportunity to purchase needed paint through the surplus property program.

contracts and agreements

At this time, Mr. Ford presented to the Board the Interlocal agreement between Lake County and the City of Leesburg regarding the correction of the drainage problem that exists at Dyches Lake.  Mr. Ford stated that Leesburg had modified the agreement somewhat but that he had no objections to the submitted agreement.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Deems and carried unanimously, the Board approved the agreement as submitted by the City of Leesburg and authorized the Chairman and Clerk to sign same.

autos and trucks

Commr. Burhans brought to the attention of the Board that the Fish and Game Commission had a 1963 truck which it no longer needed and would like to transfer this vehicle to the Fairgrounds and declare the vehicle that is presently at the Fairgrounds as surplus and sell it with the rest of the vehicles which will be sold at public auction.

On a motion by Commr. Burhans, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the Board declared the 1959 truck presently at the Fairgrounds as surplus and authorized for it to be processed with the other surplus property which will be sold at public auction.

outdoor recreational facilities

Commr. Hoskinson stated that he is receiving complaints regarding air boats being operated on Lake Minneola.  Commr. Hoskinson stated that the main objection is to the noise and the fact that they run very close to the beaches.  This was referred to Mr. William Hennessey, Pollution Control Director and Christopher C. Ford, County Attorney.

planning and zoning

At this time, Commr. Windram announced that on the Rezoning Agenda for 2:00 P.M. there was a very controversial case.  He announced that he had received a letter from Dewey Burnsed, Attorney for Laurens Glass, requesting for a 30 day postponement.  Commr. Windram stated that if there was no objection to this postponement the Board would take action on it now and allow those parties present who are interested in this case the opportunity to leave; however, if there would be some objection to the postponement it would be placed at its scheduled time on the Rezoning Agenda.

At this time, Mr. Ford, County Attorney, announced that he represented Laurens Glass in general matters; however, he wanted it noted in the record that he has not represented them in any way during this rezoning process.  He further stated that he has checked with the proper authorities in Tallahassee about this situation.

Mr. Ford recommended that if there was no objection to the request for postponement this case could be moved to the top of the agenda and heard; if there was objection it could remain on the agenda as listed and the rezoning cases could be taken in order.  It was suggested that the letter requesting a postponement be taken upstairs and read to those citizens in the fourth floor Courtroom to find out if they had any objection to the postponement of this case.

REZONING CASE 44-76-2  C-1 and R-1-7 to M-1  Dewey Burnsed, Agent

Commr. Windram asked if there was anyone present that would object to the request for postponement.

Mr. Ted Brown, Attorney for Colonial Penn who are the Developers of Hawthorne, appeared before the Board and stated that he had no objection, of course, to the postponement but would like a time and date certain established for the next hearing.  Mr. Brown stated that he was not the spokesman for the residents of Hawthorne.

Mr. Harry Gailbraith appeared before the Board and stated that he was the spokesman for the residents at Hawthorne and that there would be no objection to the request for postponement.

At this time the Chairman asked if the Clerk and County Attorney would read this letter to the residents in the Courtroom on the fourth floor and find out if there was anyone there that would object to a postponement.

CLASSIFICATION OF USES  Community Bldg. in R-1-7

Mr. Paul Wilson, adjacent property owner appeared before the Board in objection to the Community Building being located on the property in question.

On a motion by Commr. Deems, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the Classification of use was approved.

CUP 509-5  Community Building in R-1-7  Otis Lee

Mr. Willett stated that this case had been postponed and that because additional land had been purchased, another CUP application had to be made, He, therefore, recommended that the applicant withdraw this petition.  Mr. Otis Lee requested this application be withdrawn.

On a motion by Commr. Deems, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried unanimously, the Board approved the withdrawal of this application.

REZONING CASE 44-76-2   C-1 and R-1-7 to M-1

Mr. Ford and Mr. Watkins returned from the fourth floor Courtroom and stated that there was no objection to the postponement of this case.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Deems and carried unanimously, this case was postponed until June 15, 1976 at 2:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible.

CUP 520-5  Community Building in R-1-7  Otis M. Lee and Muriel Pease

Mr. Paul Wilson, adjacent property owner, appeared before the Board in objection to the CUP.

Mr. James Botsford, resident of the area, appeared before the Board and also objected to the location of the Community Building on the property in question,

Discussion was held on the difference between a Community Center and a private club since membership dues would be required.  Mr. Ford stated that it seems most of the Community Building in the area have a membership dues and that this must be paid in order to have full use of the building.  Discussion was also held on the limitations that could be placed on the building involving alcoholic beverages.  Mr. Ford stated that in the CUP it could be stipulated that an application could not be made for the purpose of obtaining a license to sell alcohol, beer and wine on the premises in question.

Mrs. Muriel Pease appeared before the Board in favor of the Community Building and stated that she would be happy to answer any questions.

It was moved by Commr. Hoskinson that the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board be upheld and the CUP be approved with the stipulation that the Community Building would not be allowed to apply for a license to serve alcoholic beverages or beer and wine on the premises, this was seconded by Commr. Carson.  Commr. Windram and Commr. Carson voted “no” and Commr. Hoskinson and Commr. Deems voted “yes”.  The Chairman announced that the motion did not carry.  Commr. Burhans abstained because he is a member on the Board of Directors of the proposed Community Building.

On a motion by Commr. Deems, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the CUP was approved.  Commr. Burhans abstained from the vote because he is a member of the Board of Directors for the proposed Community Building.

REZONING CASE  43-76-5  R-1-7 and R-1-5 to C-1   Otis Lee

No one appeared before the Board regarding this case.  On a motion by Commr. Burhans, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the rezoning was changed to CP less blocks 35, 55 and 59.

CLASSIFICATION OF USES  Expansion of pre-existing church in C-2

No one appeared before the Board in objection to this classification.  On a motion by Commr. Deems, seconded by Commr. Burhans and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the classification of use was approved.

CUP 518-5 Expansion of Church in C-2  Edward L. Bierce

No one appeared before the Board regarding this case.  On a motion by Commr. Burhans, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the CUP was approved.

REZONING CASE 40-76-5  A to R-1-15  Robert Dunbar, Jr.

Mr. Willett stated that the applicant had withdrawn his petition.  On a motion by Commr. Burhans, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried unanimously, the Board approved the withdrawal of the petition.

REZONING CASE 33-76-5  R-1-7 to R-1-5  Charles Thompson

No one appeared before the Board in opposition to this case.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the rezoning was approved to R-1-5.

REZONING CASE 39-76-4  RR to A  Freda V. Helms

Mrs. Helms appeared before the Board and stated that when the property was purchased it was understood that the zoning was Agricultural.  She stated that she and her husband planned to raise ferns as well as operate a boarding kennel.

Mr. Lott Beard, representing Mr. R.D. Flippo, appeared before the Board in opposition to the operation of the boarding kennel.

Mrs. J. Aliger appeared before the Board representing the estate of Dorothy Kemp.  She stated that she did not object to the plans Mr. and Mrs. Helms had for the land; however, she stated that the heirs to the Kemp estate were in objection to the planned use of the land.

The Board asked Mrs. Helms if she was planning on raising dogs.  She stated that this would strictly be for boarding purposes for those individuals who go away on vacation and are unable to take their pet with them.

On a motion by Commr. Deems, seconded by Commr. Burhans and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was overturned and the rezoning denied.  Commr. Hoskinson voted “no.”

CUP 519-4 CUP in A for Agricultural Housing   Robert and Jan Sagraves

No one appeared before the Board regarding this case.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the CUP was approved.

REZONING CASE 34-76-4  R-1-7 to A or RR  Rose Marie Henley

No one appeared before the Board in opposition to this rezoning.  On a motion by Commr. Hoskinson, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the rezoning was changed to RR.

REZONING CASE 41-76-5  A to R-1-15  Betty Nacke

Mr. Willett stated that the applicant had withdrawn this petition.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Deems and carried unanimously, the Board approved the withdrawal of this petition by the applicant.

REZONING CASE 36-76-1  A to RMRP   Sun First National Bank of Leesburg

At this time discussion was held as to whether or not Commr. Deems and Commr. Carson should participate in the discussion and vote of the above case due to the fact that they are on the Board of Directors of the Sun Bank.

Mr. Ford stated that he did not believe there would be a conflict of interest and was no reason why they could not vote in this matter.

Mr. R. B. Glass, Trust Officer of the Sun Bank, appeared before the Board and stated that a representative was present to assist in the disposal of the property because the land was left to the Sun Bank of Leesburg as a trustee and the Bank was only present to help in the processing of the necessary papers that may need signing.

Mr. Henry Pringle, Attorney, appeared before the Board representing the beneficiaries of the estate.  He stated that he would like to introduce Mr. Alvin Sharp who would like to purchase the land provided it could be rezoned to RMRP.

Mr. Sharp appeared before the Board and explained to the Board the plans he had for the land in question.  He also presented to the Board a petition signed by property owners in the vicinity of the land in question stating that they were not in opposition to the rezoning as requested.

Commr. Deems and Commr. Carson still had doubts as to whether or not they should vote in this matter.  Mr. Ford stated that if they had any reservations they should abstain.

It was moved by Commr. Burhans that the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board be overturned and the rezoning be approved.

Commr. Burhans withdrew his motion because the Board had forgotten to ask if there were any objections to the rezoning.

Mr. John Miller, resident in the area, appeared before the Board and voiced his objection to this rezoning.

It was moved by Commr. Burhans that the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board be overturned for the purpose of getting it on the floor for discussion.  Commr. Hoskinson and Commr. Windram voted “no” and Commr. Burhans voted “yes”. Commr. Carson and Commr. Deems abstained from voting because they are members on the Board of Directors of the Sun Bank of Leesburg.  The Chairman announced that the motion did not carry and the application for rezoning was denied.

REZONING CASE 42-76-1  RR to A  John F. Miller

No one appeared before the Board in opposition of this case.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Burhans and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the rezoning was approved to A.

REZONING CASE 37-76-1  RR to R-1-7  David L. Herlong, Agent

No one appeared before the Board regarding this case.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the rezoning was approved to R-1-7.

REZONING CASE 38-76-1  RR and C-2 to A  S.N. Knight and Sons

No one appeared before the Board in opposition to this case.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the rezoning was approved to A.

CUP 521-1 CUP in A for Agricultural Housing  S.N. Knight & Sons

Mr. Bruce Phillips, Consulting Engineer, appeared before the Board on behalf of S.N. Knight and Sons.  He stated that there was requested more than one mobile home for caretaking purposes because there had been trouble with theft and the owners did not feel that it would be safe for just one family to be living on the grounds as caretakers.

On a motion by Commr. Deems, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the CUP was approved with the stipulated changes.

REZONING CASE 32-76-1  R-1-7 to CP   Harry Anderson

Commr. Windram stated that Nancy Horton, representing the Bassville Park Committee, had telephoned to inform the Board that they were not in opposition to this rezoning.

Mr. Jeff Ray, Attorney, appeared before the Board and stated that originally a dwelling unit had been requested and that since that time his client had decided that she did not need the dwelling unit.  He inquired as to whether or not this would affect the petition.  He was informed that this did not.

On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Burhans and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the rezoning was changed to CP.

CLASSIFICATION OF USES  Pursuant to Section 611.170

Mr. Willett stated that this classification was connected to case #44-76-2 and that since that case was postponed until June 15, 1976 at 2:00 P.M. this should also be postponed.  On a motion by Commr. Deems, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, consideration for approval of this classification was postponed until June 15, 1976 at 2:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible.

REZONING CASE 35-76-3  CP in A  Billy and Ruby Brewer

No one appeared before the Board in opposition to this case.  On a motion by Commr. Hoskinson, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the rezoning was approved to CP.

REZONING CASE 45-76-3  RR to R-1-15  John Stokes and James Roper

No one appeared before the Board in opposition to this case.  On a motion by Commr. Hoskinson, seconded by Commr. Burhans and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the rezoning was approved to R-1-15.

522-3 CUP in C-1  Virgil McKown

No one appeared before the Board in opposition to this case.  On a motion by Commr. Hoskinson, seconded by Commr. Burhans and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the CUP was approved.

REZONING CASE  46-76-1   A to RA  Larry Taylor

No one appeared before the Board in opposition to this case.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Burhans and carried unanimously, the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board was upheld and the rezoning was approved to RA.

REZONING CASE 47-76-1  A to RR  Larry Taylor

Mr. Taylor, Attorney, appeared before the Board and stated that his client would like to withdraw this petition.  Mr. Willett stated that the letter requesting withdrawal was received after the Planning Department had advertised next month’s cases of which this was one.  Therefore, the withdrawal would have to be considered next month and could only be postponed at this time.

On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Deems and carried unanimously, this case was postponed until June 15, 1976 at 2:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible.

5321 CUP for recreational facility   Larry Taylor

No one appeared before the Board in opposition to this CUP.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried unanimously, this case was postponed until June 15, 1976 at 2:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible.

At this time, Mr. Willett presented to the Board a request from Charles Zimmermann to live in a mobile home on the same piece of property on which his conventional dwelling is being constructed.  On a motion by Commr. Deems, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the Board approved the above request subject to the proper bond being posted and with the understanding that the mobile home will be removed immediately upon the completion of the conventional dwelling or at the request of the Board of County Commissioners.

accounts allowed

Mr. Watkins presented to the Board a request for it to designate the Bank of Mount Dora as that financial institution to receive Lake County’s Revenue Sharing Funds through direct deposits from the Federal Government.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Burhans and carried unanimously, the above request was approved and the Chairman was authorized to sign the necessary forms.

Mr. Ford presented to the Board a bill from Conley Electric in the amount of $150 for repairs made at the American Legion Building in Umatilla.  Mr. Ford stated that the Board had stated that this bill would not be paid until the maintenance agreement had been executed and received from the officer of the American Legion in Umatilla; however, Mr. Ford suggested that the bill be paid at this time because the revised agreement had not yet been completely by his office.  On a motion by Commr. Burhans, seconded by Commr. Deems and carried unanimously, the Board approved for the above mentioned bill to be paid.

contracts and agreements

Commr. Hoskinson presented to the Board for its consideration the agreement between Lake County and the City of Wildwood regarding the use of our Animal Shelter for a period of time.  Discussion was held.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Hoskinson and carried, the Board approved the above agreement as amended and authorized for the Chairman and Clerk to sign same.  Commr. Deems and Commr. Burhans voted “no”.

suits affecting the county

Mr. Ford stated that the Board had just been served with an amendment to a complaint of the United States of America vs. Lake County.  He stated that he would look into the matter.

county employees

Mr. Ford discussed with the Board the upcoming union election.  He stated that according to the seminars which he, Commr. Hoskinson and Van Porter have attended; it would be legal and proper for the County to make known to the employees its feelings on union representation.  He stated that Mr. Porter has composed a letter and would like the Board to review it.

At this time, Commr. Hoskinson stated that there may be a need for Mr. Porter to seek professional assistance and information regarding unions after the 28th of May and suggested that Mr. Porter be able to retain the firm of Cody and Associates on their standard fee basis if necessary.  On a motion by Commr. Hoskinson, seconded by Commr. Carson and carried unanimously, the Board approved for Mr. Porter to retain the firm of Cody and Associates at their regular fee basis if he feels it is necessary to obtain professional advice after the union election is held on May 28, 1976 in Lake County.

The Board reviewed the letter which the Chairman will sign expressing the views of the County regarding union representation.  On a motion by Commr. Carson, seconded by Commr. Deems and carried unanimously, the Board approved for a letter to be sent from the Board expressing its views on union presentation subject to the letter meeting the approval of the Chairman, County Attorney and Mr. Evan Porter.  The Chairman stated that he would like to sign each letter personally.

There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 5:10 P.M.

_____________________________

Thomas j. windram, chairman

 

­­­­­________________________

James C. Watkins, Clerk