A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

APRIL 27, 2004

            The Lake County Board of County Commissioners met in a regular session on Tuesday, April 27, 2004, at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting Room, on the second floor of the Lake County Administration Building, Tavares, Florida. Commissioners present at the meeting were: Debbie Stivender, Chairman; Jennifer Hill, Vice Chairman; Catherine C. Hanson; Welton G. Cadwell; and Robert A. Pool. Others present were: Sanford A. “Sandy” Minkoff, County Attorney; William “Bill” Neron, County Manager; Wendy Taylor, Executive Office Manager, Board of County Commissioner’s Office; and Toni M. Riggs, Deputy Clerk.

            INVOCATION AND PLEDGE

            Mr. Sandy Minkoff, County Attorney, gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance.

            AGENDA UPDATE

            Mr. Bill Neron, County Manager, noted that the Board has been presented with Addendum No. 1, and Addendum No. 2, as part of its agenda today, because the consent items were time sensitive.

            Commr. Stivender stated that, on zoning days, the Board does not hold a public question and comment period but, because there have been a couple of people requesting to be heard today, she has agreed to allow them to speak after the zoning cases.

            COUNTY MANAGER’S CONSENT AGENDA

            RECYCLING/RESOLUTIONS

            Commr. Hanson felt that there needed to be a little bit more attention given to Tab 1 regarding the Reduce, Reuse and Recycle Resolution.

            Commr. Stivender asked that the Board hear each consent item before voting.

            Commr. Hanson stated that a couple of years ago, the County had initiated the program encouraging the County to buy, when financially feasible, recycled products, and she did not know if there had been any changes to that program, or whether this was just to reconfirm action.

            Mr. Bill Neron, County Manager, explained that the request today is reaffirming the current policy that recognizes buying recycled products and products that can be recycled, which the County is doing wherever possible.

            On a motion by Commr. Hanson, seconded by Commr. Pool and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved the request from Purchasing for approval of Reduce, Reuse and Recycle Resolution 2004-63 affirming the Lake County Board of County Commissioners commitment to the proactive procurement of reusable, recyclable and recycled products and encouraging the County’s citizens, businesses, suppliers, and contractors to adopt and implement similar practices.

            ADDENDUM NO. 1

            COUNTY MANAGER’S CONSENT AGENDA

            CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION/BYRNE DRUG GRANT

            Mr. Bill Neron, County Manager, explained that the Community Services item designates Ms. Robbie Hollenbeck, Special Projects Coordinator, to be the County signatory on the Byrne Grant application and processing of those funds.

            On a motion by Commr. Hanson, seconded by Commr. Pool and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved the request from Community Services, for approval for the Board of County Commissioners to serve as the coordinator for local governments in Lake County in the Bryne Drug grant application process, signature on the “Certification of Participation” document (contingent on County Attorney approval), and designation of Ms. Robbie Hollenbeck to coordinate the preparation of the application.

            ADDENDUM NO. 2

            COUNTY MANAGER’S CONSENT AGENDA

            PURCHASE AGREEMENT/GATCH/GETFORD ROAD

            Mr. Bill Neron, County Manager, explained that Public Works is requesting approval to accept and sign a Purchase Agreement to acquire a 23 acre parcel for $281,920.00 and approval of a Capital Substitution in the Stormwater Land Acquisition (610) account. He noted that this was a time sensitive item, because the contract had to be signed at the end of this month.

            On a motion by Commr. Hanson, seconded by Commr. Cadwell and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved the request from Public Works for approval to accept and sign a Purchase Agreement to acquire a 23 +/- acre parcel of land from Carrol E. And Renelda M. Gatch, located on the north side of Getford Road, the requested purchase price is $281,920.00 ($12,000.00 per acre); and approval of a Capital Substitution in the Stormwater Land Acquisition (610) account to substitute this project for other projects where easements have been or are anticipated to be donated.

            Mr. Jim Stivender, Director of Public Works, stated that this is a joint project with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD), and the Lake County Water Authority.


            PUBLIC HEARINGS

            ROAD VACATIONS

            PETITION NO. 1021 - JEAN E. RYDER - LEESBURG AREA - DISTRICT 1

 

            Mr. Jim Stivender, Director of Public Works, addressed the Board to discuss Petition Number 1021 by Jean E. Ryder to vacate a portion of a drainage easement in the Plat of Pennbrooke Phase K, Units I and II, in the Leesburg area, Commission District 1. Mr. Stivender explained that the applicant is represented by Mr. Steve Richey, Attorney. The request is being made to clear title, and staff has no objections to the road vacation.

            Commr. Stivender opened the public hearing portion of the meeting and called for public comment. There being none, the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

            On a motion by Commr. Hill, seconded by Commr. Cadwell and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved Petition Number 1021 by Jean E. Ryder to vacate a portion of a drainage easement in the Plat of Pennbrooke Phase 1K, Units I and II located in Section 19, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, in the Leesburg area - Commission District 1 - Resolution 2004-64.

            ROAD VACATIONS

            PETITION NO. 1022 - HARVEY L. MASSEY - LEESBURG AREA - DISTRICT 3

 

            Mr. Jim Stivender, Director of Public Works, addressed the Board to discuss Petition Number 1022, Representative Robert R. Cyrus, to vacate and cease maintenance on a portion of a County maintained roadway known as Windmill Road (Number 2917), in the Leesburg area, Commission District 3. Mr. Stivender explained the request noting that this was used as a turnaround for citrus vehicles.

            Commr. Stivender opened the public hearing portion of the meeting and called for public comment. She noted that Mr. Robert R. Cyrus, Representative, was present and had no comments unless there were questions, and no one present wished to speak in opposition to the request. There being no public comment, the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed. She noted that the request is in her district, and she had no objections.

            On a motion by Commr. Hill, seconded by Commr. Pool and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved Petition Number 1022 by Harvey L. Massey, Representative Robert R. Cyrus, to vacate and cease maintenance on a portion of a County maintained roadway known as Windmill Road (Number 2917) located in Section 31, Township 20 South, Range 25 East, in the Leesburg area - Commission District 3 - Resolution 2004-65.


            ROAD VACATIONS

            PETITION NO. 1023 - BOBBY L. & LORENE LEININGER, WILLIAM G. AND

            JULIE R. LAW - MASCOTTE AREA - DISTRICT 3

 

            Mr. Jim Stivender, Director of Public Works, addressed the Board to discuss Petition Number 1023 by Bobby L. and Lorene Leininger, William G. And Julia R. Law, Representative Robert R. Cyrus, to vacate a reservation for road purposes to clear title on property in the Mascotte area, Commission District 3. Mr. Stivender explained that it is located along the edges of rural property, and staff did not show it on their map, so they had to draw it on there.

            Commr. Stivender opened the public hearing portion of the meeting and called for public comment. It was noted that Mr. Robert R. Cyrus, Representative, was present. There being no public comment, the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

            On a motion by Commr. Cadwell, seconded by Commr. Pool and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved Petition Number 1023 by Bobby L. and Lorene Leininger, William G. And Julia R. Law, Representative Robert R. Cyrus to vacate a reservation for road purposes to clear title on property located in Section 22, Township 22 South, Range 24 East, in the Mascotte area - Commission District 3 - Resolution 2004-66.

            PUBLIC HEARINGS - REZONINGS

            PETITION PH#25-04-4 - KEITH SHAMROCK - LESLIE CAMPIONE, ATTORNEY

            R-1 TO R-4 - TRACKING #17-04-Z

 

            Mr. Jeff Richardson, Planning Manager, Planning and Development Services, addressed the Board and stated that staff has received a request from Ms. Leslie Campione, Attorney, for a 30 day postponement for Petition PH#25-04-4, Keith Shamrock, Leslie Campione, Attorney, Tracking #17-04-Z, until the Lake County School Board and the Board have the opportunity to meet and discuss issues, school funding and school impact fees, as noted in her letter.

            Commr. Hanson disclosed for the record that she had discussed this application with both the applicant and the opposition, and Commr. Stivender, Commr. Pool, Commr. Hill, and Commr. Cadwell, disclosed the same.

            Commr. Stivender opened the public hearing and called for public comment on the request for postponement. There being none, the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

            Commr. Hanson made a motion, which was seconded by Commr. Cadwell, to approve the request for postponement, for 30 days, Petition PH#25-04-4, Keith Shamrock, Leslie Campione, Attorney, Tracking #17-04-Z.

            Under discussion, Commr. Cadwell explained that the applicant and their representative cannot do anything about what happens between the Board and the School Board, but he hopes that they utilize their time to try and solve the problems brought forth by some of the neighbors.

            Commr. Stivender called for a vote on the motion, which was carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote.

            PETITION PH#20-04-2 - MITRA & NISHA MATHURA - A TO AR

            TRACKING #18-04-Z

 

            Mr. John Kruse, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Services, presented Rezoning Case PH#20-04-2, Mitra and Nisha Mathura, Tracking #18-04-Z, a request to rezone from A (Agriculture District) to AR (Agricultural Residential), on a parcel that is approximately five acres in size, which is located in the Clermont area on Hancock Road. The City of Clermont had no objections to this rezoning request. The property will be served by central water and individual septic tank. In their review of the request, staff found that it does not conflict with the Land Development Regulations (LDRs), and it is consistent with LDR Section 3.00.03. The applicants wish to build a single-family residence on half of the five acres for their use, and to build a second home on the remaining two and a half acres and offer it for sale. It has gone through the minor lot split process, and a variance was granted contingent upon getting this rezoning request. Mr. Kruse reviewed pictures of the site (in backup) and stated that staff is recommending approval of the request. The Zoning Board approved the request 7-0.

            Commr. Stivender opened the public hearing and called for public comment. There being none, the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

            Commr. Pool made a motion, which was seconded by Commr. Hanson, to uphold the recommendation of the Zoning Board and approve Rezoning Case PH#20-04-2, Mitra and Nisha Mathura, from A (Agriculture District) to AR (Agricultural Residential), Tracking #18-04-Z, to build a single-family residence on half of the five acres for their use, and to build a second home on the remaining two and a half acres and offer it for sale, and Ordinance 2004-28.

            Under discussion, Commr. Hanson stated that it is obvious that it is urban expansion all the way around this property, and it is very appropriate to go to this zoning,.

            Commr. Stivender called for a vote on the motion, which was carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote.

            PETITION PH#22-04-1 - EAGLES NEST BAPTIST CHURCH, INC.

            STEVEN J. RICHEY, P.A. - R-1 AND AMENDMENT TO CFD TO CFD/AMD

            TRACKING #20-04-CFD

 

            Mr. John Kruse, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Services, presented Rezoning Case PH#22-04-1, Eagles Nest Baptist Church, Steven J. Richey, P.A., Tracking #20-04-CFD/AMD, a request to rezone from R-1 (Rural Residential) to CFD (Community Facility District) and amend CFD Ordinance #86-85 that permits the existing church. The request involves 11 +/- acres for a church and associated uses. The applicant is proposing an expansion to the existing church building and will include a Fellowship and Education Facility, Family Life Center, Worship Center capable of seating up to 700 people, two residential housing units for temporary use by ministers, softball area, pavilion, and amphitheater. The proposed additions are to occur within the next 25 years as their needs grow. Mr. Kruse stated that he talked to a representative from their church, and they are in a long range planning process. It is located in the Fruitland Park area, and the future land use is urban expansion. They currently have an individual well and individual septic tank. Staff has reviewed the request and found that it is not in conflict with the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Section 3.00.03, and it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Policy 1-12.1. Mr. Kruse reviewed pictures of the site (in backup) and a conceptual site plan, which was submitted and marked as Exhibit LC-1. He explained that the ordinance addresses specific conditions including external loudspeakers, which are prohibited, and lighting. Staff is recommending approval of the request. The Zoning Board approved the request 7-0.

            Commr. Stivender opened the public hearing portion of the meeting and called for public comment.

            Mr. Steve Richey, Attorney representing the applicant, stated that he had nothing to add to the staff report other than that this church has been in this location since the 1980s, and they have acquired more land for their future expansion over the next 25 years.

            Commr. Cadwell pointed out language in the ordinance that requires the applicant to connect to central sewer when it becomes available in the area, which Mr. Richey acknowledged.

            It was noted that no one present wished to speak in opposition to the request. There being no further public comment, the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

            In response to a question about the amphitheater, Mr. Richey clarified that it would be an open theater, with internalized loudspeakers, as outlined in the conditions of the ordinance.

            On a motion by Commr. Hill, seconded by Commr. Hanson and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board upheld the recommendation of the Zoning Board and approved Rezoning Case PH#22-04-1, Eagles Nest Baptist Church, Inc., R-1 (Rural Residential) and Amending Current CFD (Community Facility District), Ordinance #86-85, to CFD/AMD, Tracking #20-04-CFD/AMD, to allow expansions to the church building, as outlined in Ordinance 2004-29.


            PETITION PH#19-04-2 - SOUTH ENGLISH CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH’S

            WITNESSES - DICK SANDERS, AGENT - R-6 TO CFD - TRACKING #21-04-CFD

 

            Mr. John Kruse, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Services, presented Rezoning Case PH#19-04-2, South English Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, Dick Sanders, Agent, Tracking #21-04-CFD, a request to rezone from R-6 (Urban Residential District) to CFD (Community Facility District), approximately 4.04 acres for a church and associated uses. The applicant is proposing a 5,136 square foot building consisting of a 200 seat auditorium, two meeting rooms, office, restroom facilities, and a covered drop off. The parcel in located in the Green Swamp Area of Critical State Concern, in the South Clermont area, on the southwest corner of CR 561 and Florida Boys Ranch Road. The site will be served by an individual well and individual septic tank. The application has gone through preliminary Development Review Staff (DRS), and the Health Department has submitted comments indicating that it would be good if they have the capability of connecting to an advanced central well and septic tank system. Staff has reviewed the proposed rezoning and found that it is not in conflict with the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Section 3.00.03, and it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Policy 1-12.1. Staff is recommending approval of the request. The Zoning Board approved the request 7-0. Mr. Kruse reviewed pictures of the site (in backup) and a conceptual site plan (a second revision), which was submitted and marked as Exhibit LC-1. He noted that they are also proposing paved parking.

            Commr. Hanson stated that she would prefer to see pervious parking, as opposed to paved parking, which would reduce the footprint of the paved area.

            Commr. Stivender opened the public hearing and called for public comment. It was noted that no one present wished to speak in opposition to the request.

            Commr. Stivender noted that she received an e-mail last night, and Commr. Pool noted that he received two e-mails with concerns about the rezoning.

            Mr. Dick Sanders stated that he is representing the South English Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses and, in regard to the parking issue, many of their current facilities do not have paved parking but have grass, or others means of parking with bumpers, so it would not be a problem to reduce the paving, as requested. Mr. Sanders stated that they are in great need of the building, and it is in a location that is accessible to many members of the congregation.

            Commr. Hanson stated that she does not have a problem with the application, but she would like to have the reduction in the pavement. It was noted that this would be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood, and the Green Swamp. She would like to see the applicant work with staff recognizing that they would have the need for some paved parking, but to minimize the paved parking.

            Commr. Pool stated that he is also glad that the applicant is coming off of Boys Ranch Road instead of CR 561, which makes a safer intersection, and he feels it will blend nicely with the grass parking.

            Commr. Stivender stated that, not knowing the exact concern that was expressed in the e-mail she received, she asked if there was going to be buffering between this parcel.

            Mr. Kruse explained that the applicant will be required to have a type “B” buffer, 15 feet wide, with four canopy trees per 100 feet, and a single row of shrubs.

            Commr. Pool stated that everyone wants to be a good neighbor and, while there may not be many that are in opposition, there are some people that are concerned with change in their neighborhood, and both the landscape buffering and grass parking would minimize those concerns, and the imprint on that area. He did not feel asphalt would be beneficial to the area.

            Mr. Kruse provided the Board with a correction on the buffering requirements. He stated that the buffer would be 10 feet wide instead of 15 feet, with three trees per 100 feet. He noted that, since this is a CFD, the Board can put specifics in the ordinance.

            Mr. Sandy Minkoff, County Attorney, stated that there would have to be facts that would substantiate that requirement.

            Mr. Sanders stated that the applicant would have no problem with a change in the buffering requirement.

            Commr. Pool made a motion, which was seconded by Commr. Hanson, to uphold the recommendation of the Zoning Board and approve Rezoning Case PH#19-04-2 - South English Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses/Dick Sanders, a request to rezone from R-6 (Urban Residential District) to CFD (Community Facility District), Tracking #21-04-CFD/AMD, Ordinance 2004-30, with amendments to include a Class B buffer, and grass parking being permitted, not the asphalt, in that location.

            Under discussion, Commr. Hanson asked for clarification of the location of the buffer, with staff clarifying that it will be around the perimeter of the property.

            Commr. Stivender called for a vote on the motion, which was carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote.


            PETITION PH#28-04-2 - HOLLY HILL FRUIT PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC.

            CHARLES W. GREGG, GREATER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

            HOLLY HILL FRUIT PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC.

            AMEND PUD ORDINANCE #2002-53 - TRACKING #29-04-PUD/AMD

 

            Ms. Tiffany Kapner, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Services, presented Rezoning Case PH#28-04-2, Holly Hill Fruit Products Company, Inc. (Owner); Charles W. Gregg, Greater Construction Corporation and Holly Hill Fruit Products Company, Inc. (Applicant), a request to amend PUD Ordinance #2002-53 to eliminate 180 town homes and replace with 46 single-family homes, change buffers and more accurately reflect phasing acreage. The most recent amendment to the ordinance was done in May, 2002, and allowed for 160 town homes in Phase 5; 125,000 square feet of commercial; and a total of 490 dwelling units. The property is approximately 190 acres and is located within urban expansion. Ms. Kapner reviewed the following Amendment Summary, as found in the backup:

1.         Amend the number of dwelling units from 160 town homes to 46 single-family homes. This would equate to 2 dwelling units per gross acre; Policy 1-1.6 of the Comprehensive Plan allows up to 4 dwelling units per acres in Urban Expansion.

 

2.         Amend density from 8 dwelling units per acre to 2.5 dwelling units per acre for Phase 5. The overall approved density of the PUD is currently 2.5 dwelling units per gross acre. This reduction in density for Phase 5 would not conflict with all applicable provisions of the Lake County Land Development Regulations or Comprehensive Plan and would reduce the overall density of the development to 2.0 dwelling units per gross acre.

 

3.         Amend the total number of units from 490 to 382. A reduction in the number of dwelling units would result in a reduction of the overall density of the PUD and would not conflict with the applicable provisions of the Lake County Land Development Regulations or Comprehensive Plan.

 

4.         Amend the buffer along the northern boundary of the property that separates Orange Tree and The Savannas from 50 feet to 25 feet and eliminate the 6-foot masonry wall. Table 9.01.04.B of the Lake County Land Development Regulations requires a Type B landscape buffer between the two PUD’s. A Type B buffer is 15 feet wide, with 4 canopy trees per 100 feet and a single row of shrubs. A 25-foot width exceeds the Type B width requirements.

 

5.         Amend the buffer on the west boundary between proposed single-family residences and commercial to include a 6-foot high masonry wall that is located on the commercial property. (The commercial property is located in Phase 6 and will contain 125,000 square feet of commercial uses. This would be the buffer in between the Orange Tree single-family residence and the Orange Tree commercial, not in between the Orange Tree commercial and The Savannas.) Table 9.01.04.B of the Lake County Land Development Regulations requires a Type B landscape buffer separating a PUD from any other zoning district. The wall can be used in conjunction with a Type B landscape buffer.

 

6.         Change phasing acreage to more accurately reflect what has been built. The plans should be changed to reflect accurate buildout.

 

            Ms. Kapner stated that the proposed rezoning does not conflict with the LDRs as seen in Section 3.00.03, and it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as seen in Policy 1-1.6. Staff is recommending approval of the request. The Zoning Board approved the request 7-0. It was noted that the Zoning Board minutes reflected that the School Board member voted for this request.

            Commr. Stivender opened the public hearing portion of the meeting and called for public comment.

            Mr. Steve Richey, Attorney representing the applicant, addressed the Board and stated that he agrees with all of the requirements, as presented by Ms. Kapner.

            Commr. Hill stated that, since this request was approved in 1999, this is an overall reduction of almost 130 homes, and this may be the reason that the School Board member voted in favor of it, because of the improvement over the years. It was amended in 2002, which reduced the number, and the Board is reducing the number again.

            On a motion by Commr. Pool, seconded by Commr. Hill and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board upheld the recommendation of the Zoning Board and approved Rezoning Case PH#28-04-2, Holly Hill Fruit Products Company, Inc., Owner; Charles W. Gregg, Greater Construction Corporation and Holly Hill Fruit Products Company, Inc., a request to amend PUD Ordinance #2002-53, to eliminate 180 townhouses and replace them with 46 single-family houses, change buffers and more accurately reflect phasing acreage, Ordinance 2004-31, and with those provisions that are outlined in the ordinance.

            PETITION CUP #04/4/1-2 - HANK & ELIZABETH OTLOWSKI

            CUP IN A - TRACKING #28-04-CUP

 

            Mr. Rick Hartenstein, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Services, presented Rezoning Case CUP #04/4/1-2, Hank and Elizabeth Otlowski, CUP (Conditional Use Permit) in A (Agriculture), Tracking #28-04-CUP, to allow a horse farm including a boarding, breeding, training, and riding facility on approximately 25 acres south of Mascotte off of Bay Lake Road. The site will also have a single family residence, and they will use an individual well and septic tank. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the general purposes, goals, objectives, and standards of the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) and LDR Section 3.00.02.C. The applicants submitted a boundary survey, as shown, which was marked and entered as Exhibit LC-1. They will have no problem meeting the 200 foot setbacks from all property lines, as required. Staff recommends approval with conditions to allow for a horse farm including a boarding, breeding, training, and riding facility that would contain up to 10 stalls; there shall be no public events on the property; and the owner shall adhere to the setback and lighting conditions as set forth in the ordinance. The Zoning Board approved the request 7-0, with conditions.

            Commr. Stivender opened the public hearing portion of the meeting and called for public comment. She noted that the applicant was present to answer questions of the Board. There being no public comment, the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

            Commr. Pool made a motion, which was seconded by Commr. Hanson, to uphold the recommendation of the Zoning Board and approve Rezoning Case CUP#04/4/1-2, Hank and Elizabeth Otlowski, CUP in A (Agriculture), Tracking #28-04-CUP, to allow for a horse farm including a boarding, breeding, training, and riding facility that would contain up to 10 stalls; there shall be no public events on the property; and the owner shall adhere to the setback and lighting conditions, as set forth in Ordinance 2004-32.

            Under discussion, Commr. Cadwell asked for clarification on the outdoor lighting for night training, and staff confirmed that this condition is prohibited, as outlined in the ordinance.

            Commr. Stivender called for a vote on the motion, which was carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote.

            PETITION PH#23-04-1 - LARRY PHILLIPS (PHILLIPS FAMILY

            PARTNERSHIP LTD)/CECIL CLARK, TRUSTEE - C-2 AND R-1 TO CP

            TRACKING #23-04-CP

 

            Mr. Rick Hartenstein, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Services, presented Rezoning Case PH#23-04-1, Larry Phillips (Phillips Family Partnership LTD)/Cecil Clark, Trustee, a request to rezone from C-2 (Community Commercial District) and R-1 (Rural Residential) to CP (Planned Commercial District) noting that it is located in the Leesburg Joint Planning Area (JPA). The applicant is also asking to include some existing C-2 uses that would have been permitted with the original C-2 zoning, in case the car dealership should ever leave the site, and it would allow them some options to further develop the property. It is a 6.36 total acre parcel; it is in the urban expansion and commercial corridor overlay district; it is in the Leesburg utility area; central water and sewer would be provided; it meets Land Development Regulations (LDRs), Table 3.00.03; it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Policy 1-1.6. The subject parcel is located within the US 441 commercial corridor, and staff finds the proposed rezoning to be consistent with commercial location criteria. This is an existing auto dealership that wishes to expand by adding additional land to construct an auto body repair facility, to be included with the dealership, and it would be consistent with the existing uses in the area. Staff is recommending approval of the request, subject to the provisions contained in the ordinance. The Zoning Board approved the request 7-0 to CP. In regards to loud speakers, Mr. Hartenstein noted that there was no language in the ordinance pertaining to this issue, but the Board can include it, if they so desire.

            To avoid any sort of a conflict, Commr. Stivender noted that buys her vehicles from Cecil Clark. She opened the public hearing and called for public comment.

            Mr. Steve Richey, Attorney representing the applicant, addressed the Board and explained the location of the property, as shown on the boundary survey, which was submitted and marked as Exhibit A-1. He explained that the idea is to move water retention and parking of cars to a different location and put the body shop in the same area that the Toyota dealership operates today. There is a call system on the existing dealership, and they have not received any complaints. He felt that they could add a provision to the 1.85 acres that says the speakers will face towards the dealership, or internally, not towards the residential in the back of the property. They get water from the City of Leesburg, but they do not get sewer from them. He clarified that Cecil Clark Chevrolet is owned by Greg Clark, this property is owned by Cecil Clark Trust, so Commr. Stivender buying a car from Greg Clark is not in any way a conflict with the Cecil Clark Trust.

            No one present wished to speak in opposition to the request. There being no further public comment, the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

            On a motion by Commr. Hill, seconded by Commr. Cadwell and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board upheld the recommendation of the Zoning Board and approved Rezoning Case PH#23-04-1, Larry Phillips (Phillips Family Partnership LTD)/Cecil Clark, Trustee, Tracking #23-04-CP, to rezone from C-2 (Community Commercial District) and R-1 (Rural Residential) to CP (Planned Commercial District), to be restricted to automobile retail sales, service, and repair, and shall include an auto body repair and paint facility, with additional C-2 uses as defined in Ordinance 2004-33, and including language to address concerns on noise.

            PETITION PH#27-04-2 - GLOBAL ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

            CHARLES HWANG - A TO PUD - TRACKING #30-04-PUD/AMD

 

            Mr. Rick Hartenstein, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Services, presented Rezoning Case PH#27-04-2, Global Associates International Group, Inc./Charles Hwang, Tracking #30-04-PUD/AMD, a request to rezone from A (Agriculture) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) to rezone a ten (10) acre parcel adjacent to the Sunrise Lakes PUD form A (Agriculture) to PUD (Planned Unit Development), thus amending Ordinance 1999-88 through the addition of the ten (10) acres to the PUD for short term rental town homes. The total acreage will be 123.3 acres; it is located in the Four Corners area in the urban land use category; it is located in the South Lake Utilities area; and central water and sewer is provided to the site. It meets the Land Development Regulations (LDRs), Table 3.00.03, and LDR Section 4.03.03(E) that states a preliminary traffic analysis shall be provided to evaluate the impacts of the proposed PUD on area roadways. The traffic analysis was updated for the Sunrise Lakes PUD and submitted by the applicant, as outlined in the Findings by staff. Staff recommends approval of the request with conditions as an amendment to the PUD Ordinance 1999-88 to allow for short term rental town homes to be developed on the described ten (10) acres. The Zoning Board approved the request 7-0 with an amendment to PUD Ordinance 1999-88 to allow short term rental townhouses to be developed on the described ten (10) acres, and a condition that a disclosure of short term rentals in this PUD to the lot buyers be required in PH#27-04-2. Mr. Hartenstein stated that the applicant has already been utilizing the short term rental throughout the whole PUD, and he was supplied with a copy of their Rental Disclosure, which was submitted and marked as Exhibit LC-1.

            Discussion occurred regarding short term rentals not having any impact on the schools, with Mr. Hartenstein explaining that the Ordinance reflects, with these additional ten (10) acres, that the 132 units shall be short term rentals, so there will be no conflict and no impacts on the schools. He also noted that, through site plan review, the applicant will have to do some tree replacement on site.

            Commr. Cadwell pointed out, as just a point of interest, on Page 5 of Ordinance 1999-88, X. School Impact Fee, that it states the applicant shall be required to pay a fee of $150.00 for the provisions of school impact fees.

            Commr. Pool pointed out that any short term rentals pay a bed tax, so they have benefitted from that concept.

            Mr. Hartenstein stated that the applicant will be required to submit a landscape plan and site plan for the multi-family. He noted that the map comes from the 2000 aerial.

            Mr. John Adams, R. J. Whidden & Associates, stated that they are planners for the project. Mr. Adams stated that these will be two story townhouses and, in response to Commr. Hanson’s concerns about the sensitive lands, there are no jurisdictional lands on this particular ten (10) acre tract, even though they are backed up to areas that are sensitive.

            Ms. Robin Tucker stated that she lives in the Woodridge Subdivision directly adjoining and to the south of this proposed rezoning of property. Ms. Tucker explained that there are a lot of mature trees on this property, and it is fairly thick, and there are a lot of wildlife that live in this area. During the rainy season, it gets very wet, and this is a concern, because the residents want to know where this water is going to go. The residents in Woodridge Subdivision already have short term rentals on three sides of them, and this would add to the traffic in the area. Also those staying in the short term rentals have no concern with the trash they leave behind and they have no sense of community. Ms. Tucker stated that there is excess noise from the pool areas, and there is a general disregard for their common areas. She stated that there are quite a few developments in this area. She submitted a letter and a list of acceptable conditions, which was marked as Exhibit O-1, if the request is approved by the Board. She discussed the following:

            A)       Approval only the minimum units allowed for development on this property to minimize the impact on surrounding residential community.

 

            B)        Extensive survey of wetlands and water run-off impact, also taking into account the future development of the adjoining eastern parcel (Pinewoods Resort).

 

            C)        Maintain maximum wetlands area to conserve wildlife habitat.

 

            D)       Additional buffer footage of a minimum of 25 feet (for a total of 50+ feet).

 

            E)        Accessible by roadway from existing Sunrise Lakes Estates property only.

 

            F)        Maximum two-story limit.

 

            G)       Limited height of streetlight posts (10-15ft.) And direct lighting only.

 

            Commr. Pool clarified that, in looking at the map, there is no ingress or egress from the additional ten (10) acres into the Woodridge Subdivision; it is from their existing PUD. He wanted to know whether it was designed to be interconnected from the beginning.

            Commr. Cadwell explained that it was the Board that encouraged the interconnection between the subdivisions, to keep the traffic from US 27 from cutting through there.

            Mr. Adams explained that the original PUD, and the one to the south, were originally approved in the early 1990s, noting that R. J. Whidden & Associates worked on both of them, and it was the Board that required that interconnection. He pointed out that they are proposing no additional connection from the ten (10) acres to the south. They are asking to add ten (10) acres to the existing PUD, to build 126 townhouse units, even though the total density allowed for the entire PUD is 132. They are only allowed up to seven dwelling units per acre (70) on the ten (10) acres but, because it is part of the entire PUD, the density is calculated and based on the entire PUD.

            Mr. Adams stated that he would like to address some of the other concerns brought forth by Ms. Tucker. In regard to stormwater, they will be required to permit this project through engineering plans and meet all requirements of the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). They have proposed a stormwater management pond on the additional ten (10) acres and, if there is any flooding on the property to the south, the development of this property will make flooding better, because any runoff will be retained on site for treatment purposes. In regard to traffic, staff indicated that the Department of Transportation (DOT) will be six-laning US 27, which will provide them some relief. To address the issue of noise, they have designed a small recreation area with a community pool, which will be located in the center of the project, and the buildings will actually buffer the noise.

            Because Mr. Adams was unaware of any opposition to the request and had not met with Ms. Tucker, the Board felt that it would be advantageous to all parties if they took a short recess, to allow the applicant’s representative time to meet with Ms. Tucker to discuss her concerns.

            RECESS & REASSEMBLY

            At 10:15 a.m., Commr. Stivender noted that the Board would take a 15 minute recess.

            CITIZEN QUESTION AND COMMENT PERIOD

            Commr. Stivender stated that, because she has had several individuals approach her about speaking before the Board today, she is going to change the schedule around a little bit and take public comment at this time.

            City of Minneola/Fire Fees

            Mr. Ed Earl, a resident of Minneola, thanked the Board for allowing him to speak today, even though the Board does not take public comment on zoning days. Mr. Earl stated that he is concerned about an article he read in the newspapers that said the Board is not going to raise taxes and fire fees, which are the assessments and impact fees. He questioned how the County’s fire services can take such a big hit, $500,000 to $600,000, if Minneola decides to provide its own services.

            Mr. Bill Neron, County Manager, explained that the actual hit to the County, in terms of costs, will be about $395,000. The County will absorb that amount through the reserves and take the money that they were going to use to build a new fire station in the City of Minneola and use it to better serve the people in the unincorporated area.

            Mr. Earl disagreed with the numbers presented by Mr. Neron and stated that there are 3,242 homes in the City of Minneola and this does not include multi-family, trailers, or businesses and, with that number, it would be $444,000 and the County has already collected $34,000 this year in impact fees. He stated that this is well over the $465,000 the County is saying that it costs to run Station 92.

            Mr. Neron clarified that the $465,000 figure the County had in its proposal was a rough figure, and they do not budget by stations; they budget for the system as a whole. They had wanted an estimate of the costs, and those were an estimate of the direct expenses. He stated that this station does not serve just Minneola, but a widespread area around it including unincorporated areas.

            Mr. Earl stated that, in a “Daily Commercial” article, it says that the County is planning on hiring 12 new positions, which will cost about $450,000.

            Mr. Neron explained that the County has not filled some of those new positions that they have budgeted this year, because they are waiting to see whether or not Minneola is going to stay in the system. They are not going to be hiring people and not have a place for them to be. The Board authorized 14 new positions this year, and staff has only filled seven of them, so they have been saving this money throughout this fiscal year by not filling those positions, until they know what is happening with Minneola. They will be saving some of those costs, if they move that station.

            Mr. Earl wanted to know if Commr. Pool, the District Commissioner for that area, felt that it was fair for Minneola to be paying well over $600,000 next year for fire service when, by estimates, it is going to cost $465,000.

            Commr. Pool explained that the County cannot mandate or require the City of Minneola to reach an agreement with them and, if they choose to provide their own services, the Board cannot stop them, and this is what is known as home rule.

            Mr. Earl wanted to know if Commr. Pool felt it was fair for Minneola to supplement the Lake County service, because they are paying more than what it costs to service Minneola.

            Mr. Neron explained that fire protection for the unincorporated area residents are provided through a non ad valorem assessment. Several years ago, the City of Minneola chose on its own to become part of that assessment area and pay the same fees as the unincorporated residents. They do not budget by specific areas of the revenues generated; they budget for the entire unincorporated area, so it will be the City’s decision. He will be at their meeting tonight and, if they want to continue to be a part of the system, that is fine and, if they choose to go on their own, the County is starting to make other plans to move people out and relocate the station. It is purely a local decision of the Minneola Town Council this evening.

            Noise Ordinance/Dead River Vic’s

            Mr. Don Harrison, Tropical Shores, addressed the Board and stated that the residents in Tropical Shores, Venetian Gardens, and Imperial Terrace are still complaining about the noise at Dead River Vic’s. Mr. Harrison stated that there have been 100 calls this year to the Sheriff’s Department. He explained that the City of Tavares passed an ordinance, which allows them to issue $50 tickets. They had $7,500 worth of fines placed on them. Then the City increased the fines to $100, and then $500 but, since that time, the City has never written a ticket. He stated that the Sheriff’s Department always comes out to their neighborhood and verifies that the noise is too loud and they call the City, but the City will not come out to their territory anymore, since they increased the fines. He went to the Sheriff’s Department and met with Sheriff Fred A. M. Cobb who said he was going to try and help him, and he also went to the State Attorney’s Office, but they said they could not help him, because it is not criminal matter. He explained that Dead River Vic’s has gotten three tickets in three months, each in the amount of $50, but they could not find the information in the records, because they have been putting them under the manager’s name. Mr. Harrison stated that the residents need help from the Board, and they need the noise ordinance. He thought that, after all of the meetings with the residents, everything was going to work out for them and, if something is not done, he is going to make this a full time job, until he gets something done.

            In response to Commr. Stivender’s inquiry about the status of the noise ordinance, Mr. Gregg Welstead, Deputy County Manager/Director of Growth Management, stated that he will be addressing the same issue with someone who lives by Rinker Concrete. He stated that he will bring the noise ordinance back to the Board for review. It was noted that the ordinance is only applicable in the unincorporated area.

            Mr. Sandy Minkoff, County Attorney, explained that the ordinance was written that it would be a violation to send noise from the city out into the County, and the cities are aware of what the County was doing.

            Commr. Stivender stated that she would like to get the cities’ comments to review.

            REPORTS - COUNTY ATTORNEY

            SPECIAL MASTER/CODE/LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

            Mr. Sandy Minkoff, County Attorney, explained that staff advertised for a special master for Code Enforcement, and there were two applicants, both quoting the same hourly rate. Staff is recommending Mr. Bruce Duncan who has been doing this work for the City of Groveland and, because of an Attorney General’s opinion, he will have to quit Groveland and do only the work for the County. Staff is recommending approval.

            On a motion by Commr. Hill, seconded by Commr. Hanson and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved the request from the County Attorney for approval to retain Bruce G. Duncan as Special Master for Code and Land Development Regulations.


            REPORTS - COMMISSIONER HILL - DISTRICT #1

            MARCH OF DIMES CAMPAIGN

            Commr. Hill informed the Board that they went over their expected goal for the March of Dimes, and she extended her thanks to County staff, their families, and everyone who participated in the campaign.

            TROUT LAKE

            Commr. Hill informed the Board that they went to Trout Lake, where there is a new mural, and she suggested that everyone go and see it.

            REPORTS - COMMISSIONER POOL - DISTRICT #2

            PINE ISLAND/LAKE APOPKA

            Commr. Pool reported that the first phase of Pine Island was potentially approved for up to 2,200 units on this tract of land, but the Board stuck with not more than 500 units on about 1,500 acres, and the first phase sold out in four hours for $170 million - land price only - on 377 lots on Lake Apopka. He stated that Lake County raised the bar for prices on Lake Apopka, and everyone will be proud of this first class, top notch project.

            REZONING (CONTINUED)

            PETITION PH#27-04-2 - GLOBAL ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

            CHARLES HWANG - A TO PUD - TRACKING #30-04-PUD/AMD (CONTINUED)

 

            Mr. John Adams, R. J. Whidden & Associates, thanked the Board for giving him the opportunity to meet with Ms. Robin Tucker. Mr. Adams stated that he has addressed all of her concerns, but she still has one legitimate concern with the buffering requirements along the southern property line. With the cooperation of staff, he has drafted a proposed condition of approval agreed upon by Ms. Tucker that he would like to read into the record and have that be adopted as part of the ordinance, as follows:

“The developer shall preserve the existing native canopy trees within a 20 foot minimum buffer along the southern boundary of the additional 10 acre parcel, as indicated on the conceptual plan as Phase V to the greatest extent practicable; in the event that permitting requirements cause removal of existing trees within this buffer, the developer shall install plant materials meeting the requirements of a C type buffer.”

 

            Commr. Stivender questioned whether the applicant had agreed to Ms. Tucker’s conditions A - G, as noted, or the requirements of staff, with it being noted that A, B, and C are permitting requirements. She was concerned about the access issue.

            Mr. Adams explained that the access is under construction, in the existing PUD, and they are not going to access any additional properties. He pointed out that, if he accessed externally, it would have to be to the east or north and, in fact, that would create some wetland impacts.

            Discussion occurred regarding whether signs could be made to direct traffic from the ten (10) acres to the north rather than going south through the noted subdivision. It was pointed out that it is a local subdivision street for the applicant as well, and the applicant would not have any problem putting signage in there, as long as he meets traffic safety, and the Engineering Department’s requirements.

            Commr. Pool stated that they are trying to minimize the potential of cut through traffic but, as he pointed out, he did not want to impact the applicant’s development either with traffic from surrounding subdivisions, so it goes both ways. He wanted to know why staff is recommending this cut through.

            Mr. Adams explained that the original purpose for the inter-connectivity was to provide adequate roads for emergency services, and there is also commercial on the frontage of US 27 and, the more internal connections they can provide to the commercial parcels, the less traffic they put onto US 27.

            Commr. Pool discussed the possibility of providing as much buffer to the south as possible by decreasing the buffer on the north side to the woods, since it will not impact anyone on the north at this time.

            Mr. Hartenstein explained that, unless the Board chose to adopt a different type buffer, the applicant is required to have a minimum 15 foot buffer along the north boundary, which actually requires 15 feet all of the way around but, with the proposed buffering being offered as settlement between parties, this is actually increasing the buffer to 20 feet on the southern boundary. He noted that a minimum buffer, which is an “A” buffer, is ten feet wide, and he could have ten feet on the north, and a greater buffer on the south side.

            After further consideration, Mr. Adams agreed to 25 feet on the southern boundary and ten feet on the northern boundary, as part of the agreement that he proposed earlier and read into the record.

            It was noted that the actual density on the overall acreage is 5.86 for the PUD, but the density on the ten (10) acres is higher, 12.6 units to the acre, because of the transfer of density, 73 dwelling units.

            Ms. Tucker explained that the access ties into the only access in and out of the whole residential complex of Woodridge Subdivision, and she noted that, when there was a fire in this area, there was so much confusion off US 27 that cars could not get in and out of there. She feels that, with the addition of these units, it is going to be worse.

            Commr. Pool stated that, if there is a commercial corridor out there, they could always have a reverse frontage road to ensure that, along that corridor, they allow access without being on US 27.

            Mr. Fred Schneider, Engineering Director, explained the location of the signals and all access points.

            In response to the question regarding whether the Engineering Director would have a problem with the Board closing that off and making it a cul-de-sac, Commr. Cadwell explained that this was a policy decision of the Board where they thought the connectivity of those neighborhoods were important, not only for social reasons, but purely to get from one place to another, and for emergency vehicles. When the Board originally looked at this proposed area, they did not want 37 gated enclosed communities there and spreading out the traffic by having the option to go either way is one of the ways that they helped to do that.

            Commr. Pool stated that, with reverse frontage roads, they have ensured that they do not have to go out to the US 27 corridor to access commercial spots. He felt that it might protect the integrity of the neighborhoods by minimizing the cut through either way, and both subdivisions have access to a traffic light, and there is a reverse frontage road planned on the commercial corridor.

            Commr. Cadwell stated that, if they start talking about closing that access, they may have some folks that are not going to like that because their house will be on a dead end street.

            Mr. Schneider stated that the applicant could possibly provide some signage, or even some type of traffic islands, or things that will direct people to go another direction.

            Commr. Cadwell stated that he understands about the short term rentals, but he feels that it is bad policy not to have those communities connect and there are a lot of reasons besides emergency medical. He felt that they could design it so that the people that come out of the short term rental will only have an option to turn right; they can go down and turn around and come back, but the natural flow of traffic would take them to the right.

            Mr. Minkoff clarified that staff could add a provision that would say that they could only go right out of the ten acres, and only go left into the ten acres to require the traffic to come from the north.

            Mr. Adams stated that staff, through the construction review process, could put in something as simple as a concrete island, which forces a right turn out of the ten acres.

            Commr. Cadwell suggested simple language so that the design would encourage flow of traffic to the north, and then let staff design what will be necessary to accomplish this direction.

            Mr. Adams stated that he would like to clarify his suggested motion, that they will agree to 25 feet on the south, but that they will get a minimum ten feet on the north, not the required 15 feet.

            Commr. Pool made a motion, which was seconded by Commr. Cadwell, to uphold the recommendation of the Zoning Board and approve PH#27-04-2 - Charles Hwang/Global Assoc. International Group, Inc., Sunrise Lake Estates, a request to rezone from A (Agriculture) to PUD (Planned Unit Development), Tracking #30-04-PUD/AMD, as amended, with the understanding that they are going to move the project, with a 25 foot buffer to the south, and a ten foot buffer to the north; the traffic would be encouraged to turn right turn out of the neighborhoods through some traffic calming or directional from the staff, and the Board would encourage the saving of all of the larger trees to the south border where possible; street lighting will be consistent with surrounding development; and there will be one pool in the interior of the ten acres, Ordinance 2004-34.

            Under discussion, Commr. Hanson stated that her concern is still the density, and the transfer of those units from the main PUD. She understands the rational that staff went through to justify and approve this request, but she thinks that 12.6 is pretty high in an area that is pretty sensitive and, although it may not have jurisdictional wetlands, it is certainly a sensitive area. She will not be supporting the motion.

            Commr. Cadwell stated that the language is clear that the additional units are for the short term rentals, so there is no impact to schools.

            Commr. Stivender called for a vote on the motion, which was carried by a 4-1 vote.

            Commr. Hanson vote “no”.

            REPORTS - COMMISSIONER HANSON - DISTRICT #4

            ST. JOHNS ALLIANCE GROUP

            Commr. Hanson reported that she attended a meeting last week with the St. Johns Alliance group, and Ms. Blanche Hardy, Director of Environmental Services, was there. They are looking at providing the water atlas for Lake County, and many of the surrounding counties have participated in that computer GIS program, and they are looking at doing one overall for St. Johns. A letter was sent to them, which she signed, because they needed it quickly, with no commitment of money, but only to support the entire district being on the water atlas. She will see that the Board members get a copy of that letter.


            TROUT LAKE

            Commr. Cadwell stated that he had some discussions with the folks at Trout Lake, and he would like to set up a time in May when they can come forward and make a presentation on what they are doing and update the Board on the services they provide and where they are with their fund raising efforts.

            It was noted that Mr. Bill Neron, County Manager, will contact Ms. Nadine Foley and see if staff can schedule them to appear before the Board on May 11, 2004.

            COVANTA

            Commr. Cadwell questioned whether there anything that the Board could do to expedite the court proceedings in New York in regards to Covanta, and Mr. Sandy Minkoff, County Attorney, noted that there really is nothing they can do without taking a large risk. He has been in contact with Covanta about the proceedings, but he does not believe there is anything else they can do at this time.

            BIRTHDAYS

            Commr. Stivender announced that today is Commr. Cadwell’s 50th birthday. He was honored with balloons from the Florida Association of Counties (FAC).

            REPORTS - COMMISSIONER STIVENDER - CHAIRMAN AND DISTRICT #3

            MAYOR PRO TEM/HOWEY

            Commr. Stivender informed the Board that Mr. Ken Allen, Mayor pro tem, Howey, passed away unexpectedly of a heart attack. His funeral is today at 2 p.m.

            CHILDRENS’ ADVOCACY CENTER

            Commr. Stivender, liaison to the Childrens’ Advocacy Center, reported that they had their fund raiser at the Polo Club in Lady Lake, and they estimated that they profited $75,000 Saturday night.

            REPORTS - COMMISSIONER CADWELL - DISTRICT #5

            GREATER ALTOONA SOCIETY

            Commr. Cadwell noted that the Greater Altoona Society had a fish fry on Saturday at McTureous Park.

            FINANCIAL RETREAT/MID-YEAR AMENDMENT

            Commr. Cadwell stated that, when the Board met for their Financial Retreat on April 23, 2004, there was a consensus of the positions, but they did not actually go back and say that there was a consensus of those positions, even though it was implied by the Board members.

            Commr. Stivender stated that there was Board consensus on the employees to be hired, but she did not believe there was a consensus on the issue of raises/merit increases and how they were going to be handled and she did have some concern with this item.

            Mr. Bill Neron, County Manager, stated that staff can address the issue of raises/merit increases at budget time, but they were going to make the positions part of the mid-year amendment, to be brought to the Board on May 11, 2004.

            Commr. Hill stated that the only other consensus was the Clerk’s Office recommendation on the software.

            REPORTS - COMMISSIONER HANSON - DISTRICT #4

            SENTINEL PROPERTY

            Commr. Hanson asked the County Manager for a report on the Sentinel property, and Mr. Bill Neron, County Manager, noted that staff wrote a letter, and they are trying to set up a meeting where he and Commr. Stivender will visit them.

            WEKIVA

            Mr. Keith Schue, Central Florida Sierra Club, addressed the Board and stated that, after two years in the making, they finally had good Wekiva legislation that was passed on Friday. On behalf of the Sierra Club, and the entire environmental community, he thanked each of the Board members for the leadership they have shown in seeing to it that they could get that bill passed. He knows that Commr. Hanson was personally involved in making that a success, and that Commr. Cadwell was actually in Tallahassee talking to Representative Carey Baker and others to make sure they had the support to make that legislation a positive piece of work and that was achieved. It was noted that the working group also played a big part in this success.

            Commr. Hill stated that quite a few representatives called the Board while Commr. Cadwell was in Tallahassee, and they were very supportive, even though they may not have been directly involved.

            Commr. Hanson stated that they should not leave out staff, because staff was involved from the very beginning, Mr. Jim Stivender, Director of Public Works, Mr. Gregg Welstead, Deputy County Manager/Director of Growth Management, Ms. Blanche (Girardin) Hardy, and Mr. Sandy Minkoff, County Attorney.

            Mr. Neron stated that he talked to Mr. Minkoff and Mr. Welstead yesterday and, if there is no objection from the Board, at the workshop session on May 11, 2004, staff is going to try and give the Board an overview of the legislation. He felt it would be a good opportunity to give a good overview and what they need to be planning and working on in the future.

            ADJOURNMENT

            There being no further business to be brought to the attention of the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 11:15 a.m.

 

 

 

                                                                                    _________________________________

                                                                                    DEBBIE STIVENDER, CHAIRMAN

 

 

ATTEST:

 

 

________________________________

JAMES C. WATKINS, CLERK