A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD
OF
MAY 27, 2008
The Lake County Board of
INVOCATION
Mr. Sandy Minkoff,
AGENDA UPDATE
Mr. Minkoff stated that he would
like to add to the Agenda the License Agreement between
On a motion by Commr. Stivender,
seconded by Commr. Hill and carried unanimously, by a 5-0 vote, the Board
approved placing the License Agreement between
On a motion by Commr. Stivender,
seconded by Commr. Hill and carried unanimously, by a 5-0 vote, the Board
approved the
Community Services
Request for approval and
authorization of the Chairman to sign the First Amendment to the FY 2007-08
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Partnership Agreement between the
Ponceannah Cemetery Association, Inc. and the County. Commission District
5.
Request for approval an Interlocal
Agreement with the MPO for partial funding for the Fixed Route Coordinator
position.
Request
for approval for the Board of County Commissioners to serve as the coordinator
for local governments in Lake County in the Byrne memorial Justice Assistance
Grant application process, signature on the “Certification of Participation”
document and designation of Brenda Quattlebaum to identify and convene on
behalf of the BCC any required advisory board members and meetings, the
preparation of the application and/or other required documents or grant
process.
Procurement
FOR
INFORMATION ONLY-NO ACTION REQUIRED. The Procurement Policy revisions enacted
by the BCC on September 27, 2007 delegated authority to the
On a motion by Commr. Stivender,
seconded by Commr. Hill and carried unanimously, by a 5-0 vote, the Board
approved the
Request for approval of
Amendment to Lease Agreement with Wilson Investments for Code Enforcement
Division office space. Commission District 3.
PRESENTATION
Mr. Tony Lopresto, Vice
President of The Miracle League, thanked the Board for the opportunity to make
this presentation to the Board and staff.
Mr. Lopresto stated that he had been with The Miracle League for only
eight months and found it to be one of the greatest things he had ever been
involved with. He mentioned that some of
the children from the League were in the audience today, the Red Soxs and the
Yankees. He stated that The Miracle
League was composed of children with a variety of disabilities who come out on
Saturdays to play ball and unlike most kids, this means a great deal. He
explained that their games have no winners or losers, everyone gets to play, no
one strikes out and the game results in a tie.
He then presented an excellent video selection from the Today Show on
The Miracle League. He stated that
leadership should be commended on the work they have done at
Mr. Jack Wallace with the
Kiwanis Club in
Lieutenant Governor Bud Brown of
the Kiwanis Club of Lake and
Mr. Eddie Lee, commented that
the video speaks directly to the essence of The Miracle League. He shared his experience as an incoming
President of Kiwanis in
A full discussion ensued among
Commr. Hill, Commr. Stivender and Mr. Lee regarding what it takes to build a
field from raising money to obtaining the land.
Mr. Lee stated that he worked
very closely with the permitting department in
Commr. Stivender commented that
the Boundless Playground already has a retention pond, a field covering similar
to that mentioned by Mr. Lee, and new bathrooms, but that they would need to
add an additional handicap accessible bathroom. She commented that the master
plan for the Boundless Playground area was for a softball or baseball
field. She mentioned that they are
raising funds similar to the manner used by the Children’s Foundation by
donating the land. She commented that
raising money to build the field was time consuming, but actually building the
field was not. She explained that they
had matched funds raised by organizations to get the Boundless Playground
completed. She remarked that Mr. Bonilla
could work with them on the Miracle League field.
Mr. Lee stated he appreciated
the opportunity to present information on The Miracle League.
Mr. Kelly Puckett, Executive
Director of Central Florida Miracle League from
Commr. Stivender noted that there
were many generous people in
Mr. Puckett stated he started in
2001 with the idea that he wanted to make a baseball league for children with
disabilities. He then went to
Commr. Stivender stated that the
next step, if everyone agreed, was to direct the
Commr. Cadwell stated that he
had no problem working with them, but rather than having them lease the
property, the County could give them the field.
Ms. Cindy Hall,
Commr. Stivender stated that the
sooner a decision was made by the Board, the sooner they would know what
direction to take.
Commr. Cadwell asked how many
participants there were in the Clermont Chapter.
Mr. Wallace stated that there
were about 45 in
Commr. Stivender noted that it
would be a countywide facility and would imagine that all the Kiwanis Clubs
would be joining in to assist. She
explained that the reason they were not building one in Clermont and she stated
it was because the park was already in Tavares and had the availability now.
Commr. Cadwell requested that
Ms. Hall bring a plan back to the Board regarding the field for The Miracle
League.
PRESENTATION OF AWARD
Commr. Stivender presented an
award to Mr. Robert (Bobby) Bonilla, Parks Director, for the Department’s hard
work on the Boundless Playground. She
commented that Governor Jeb Bush and other prominent figures attended the
Ground Breaking two years ago. She
acknowledged that
Mr. Bonilla accepted the award
stating that it was a cooperative effort and belonged to the Board,
Community Services
Mr. David Hope, Fixed Route
Coordinator, referred to Tab 7, Resolution No. 2008-79, which was a Service
Development Grant application to the Department of Transportation (DOT) to
provide new transit service from
A motion was made by Commr.
Stivender, and seconded by Commr. Hill for approval.
Under discussion, Commr. Renick
requested clarification of Item “J” of the application under Progress Reports
where it states that a “complete review of the project will be accomplished to
determine whether it should be modified or terminated. If the decision is to terminate the project .
. ..” She commented that the language
did not make it clear who would be making that decision.
Mr. Hope explained that the
decision would be made by the Board.
Commr. Renick questioned the
cost of fuel which was shown as $3.20 per gallon.
Commr. Stivender interjected
stating that was the amount the County pays, because they pay no tax on fuel.
The Chairman stated that there
had been a motion and a second to the motion, and called for a vote. The motion carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote,
whereby the Board approved the Service Development Grant to the Florida
Department of Transportation to start a new LakeXpress route from Umatilla to
connect to Lynx service in Zellwood and approved the execution of Resolution
No. 2008-79 in support of the proposed fixed Route 4 service from
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
VACATION PETITION NO. 1128 –
JAMES J. JONES/FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF
Mr. Jim Stivender, Public Works
Director, stated that Tab 8 was for Petition No. 1128 James J. Jones/First
Baptist Church of Sorrento, to vacate a portion of
The Chairman opened the public
hearing.
There being no one who wished to
comment, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
On a motion by Commr. Stewart,
seconded by Commr. Stivender and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board
approved Vacation Petition No. 1128, James J. Jones/First Baptist Church of
Sorrento, to vacate rights of way known as Craig Avenue and a portion of Third
Street, in the Sorrento area, and approved the execution of Resolution No.
2008-80 supporting same.
VACATION PETITION NO. 1124 -
Mr. Jim Stivender stated that
Tab 9, Vacation Petition No. 1124, Lake 64 LLC, was to vacate lots, tracts, and
unnamed Rights of Way in the Plat of Groveland Farms in Commissioner’s District
2, south of Groveland. He stated that
the Petition was to vacate a subdivision that had been developed. He explained that the old platted rights of
way of Groveland Farms into ten acre tracts were being eliminated and that a
road was to remain along one edge to the particular piece of property in
question concerning the uplands associated with it, and the legal access to the
uplands. He stated that he would allow
both parties who were present at this meeting to debate the issue. Mr. Stivender displayed the site on the
monitor. He explained that during
certain times and certain years when the water is down, most of the property is
high and dry, but at other times it would be very wet with water at knee-high
level. He recommended the Board approve
the vacation of rights of way.
The Chairman opened the public
hearing.
Commr. Stewart asked Mr.
Stivender if there was a lot within that particular property where a home could
be built.
Mr. Stivender responded that he
was not aware of one.
Mr. Gary Cooney from the law
firm of Richey and Cooney in Leesburg, who represented Lake 64 LLC (Lake 64), addressed the Board
with a request to vacate the unused road rights of way (indicated in red on the
handout) mentioning that they were undeveloped, without pavement. He stated that they were currently building
subdivisions on this property and mentioned that Resolution No. 2008-81 to
vacate would not take effect until such time as the subdivision was
platted. He commented that the first
time the Board was made aware of this case was when opposing counsel stated
that if the rights of way were vacated it would greatly increase the amount of
distance his clients, Mr. Kris Ector and Mrs. Nancy Ector, had to travel in
order to have an easement to a public road, but he had argued that once the
subdivision was in place, their road would actually be closer, not further
away. He also assured the Board that
they were not opposed to the Ectors having an easement from the property, if
one was due them under Florida Statute, by showing that the property can either
be used for a dwelling, to grow timber, run cattle, or for an agriculture
business. He commented that they had
already begun construction and that the rights of way ran through lots which
would be platted and had preliminary approval, so they would actually have a
paved road they could access at a very close distance. He explained that the test outlined in the
Resolution was whether the public has any necessary use for these rights of way
and stated that he believed once the new plat was approved, the public
definitely would not have any use for the rights of way shown. He stated further that at the present time
the idea was that the designed lot line goes to the corner so that if an
easement was required, it would run along that lot line to get to the road.
Mr. Timothy P. Hoban, attorney
for the Ectors, addressed the Board with a summary of the facts. He stated that in 1950 Ms. Ector’s father bought
Lot No. 11 and in 1968 he passed away and the property was devised to her in
his Will. He explained that in 1988 when
the Pretty Lake PUD was first proposed, Ms. Ector repeatedly contacted
Mr. Cooney pointed out that Lake
64 LLC is a small, one-man operation. He
further stated that the offer was slightly mischaracterized in that the offer
stated they were willing to grant the easement and that they think the Ectors
have a slightly unrealistic view of how this property can be used. Rather than encumber this property with an
easement that may not be necessary, they suggested that they to go through the
County process and demonstrate prior to giving the easement that a building
permit could actually be pulled for this property. He explained that the only way they could get
an easement today was to have a hearing in Circuit Court and convince a Judge
under Chapter 704 that they are entitled to a Way of Necessity to get to either
one of those roads or out to SR 33. He
remarked that the worst case scenario would be to vacate the roads, let
Commr. Stewart asked if
approving the vacation would deny Ms. Ector’s access to visit land she has
great sentimental attachment to and has visited her entire life.
Mr. Cooney replied that it would
not be denying her access, however, he stated that he thought she might have
been trespassing on the property during the years she was visiting it.
Commr. Stewart remarked that
somewhere along the line Ms. Ector was promised an easement to that property
and that she should not be punished for a mistake that was made.
Mr. Cooney stated that his
client,
Mr. Minkoff stated that the
previous developer’s plan was a totally different plan, but there was a
commitment made to grant access, and he did not think the issue should be
brought up when they were doing the road vacation, but rather when the final
plat came before the Board for the project.
He felt that if
Commr. Stewart asked if that could
be done whether or not they are able to get a building permit in the future.
Mr. Minkoff stated that he
thought the Board could do that.
Mr. Hoban interjected stating
that they were doing a plat for the top half of the property, but that it would
not help them get all the way down there.
He requested that they work out the Agreement first, then vacate the
easements second. He stated that the
easement could be drafted in such a way that it goes right down the middle and
would not in any way slow down or stop their process.
Mr. Minkoff stated that if the
vacation is conditioned upon access being provided to them from SR 33, they
would be required to do that or the Resolution would not be effective. He related that if the Board desired to do
so, they would amend that Resolution today to include that and to say that the
Resolution shall not be effective until access is provided to the property
owner from SR 33, with a width of at least 20 feet.
The Chairman closed the public
hearing.
Mr. Minkoff asked the Board if
they would like to defer this matter so that they could review the language
that should be added to the Resolution.
The members of the Board agreed
to defer the matter and have Mr. Minkoff present language to be added to the
Resolution.
RECESS AND REASSEMBLY
At 10:20 a.m., the Chairman
announced that the Board would recess until 10:40 a.m.
INTRODUCTION
Commr. Renick introduced Mr.
Jack Jackson, Director of Operations for the
VACATION PETITION NO. 1124 -
Mr. Minkoff stated that during
the recess he and Mr. Stivender discussed language for the Resolution with the
inclusion of utilities. He remarked, however,
that the proposed language would require that Mr. Fred Schneider, Engineering
Director/PE, verify that legal access had been provided to the Ectors prior to
the effective date of the vacation Resolution.
Mr. Hoban stated that at the
present time there was no utility easement and that the proposal from
Mr. Cooney stated that he had an
opportunity to speak with his client, and Mr. Minkoff had shown him the
proposed language. He stated that they
do not have an issue with the proposed language with the exception being that
20 feet was a little wide for vehicular ingress and egress and they would like
to reduce that by proposing a 15’ easement.
He explained that if a house were built on the property, then they would
certainly be willing to have utilities, otherwise, it would seem that the
easement should be ingress and egress only, as water; sewer and electric were
not needed to have the ability to walk on the property.
Commr. Cadwell stated that Mr.
Minkoff was presenting language to seek a solution.
Mr. Minkoff reviewed the
proposed additional language with the members of the Board.
On a motion by Commr. Renick,
seconded by Commr. Stewart and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board
approved Vacation Petition No. 1124. Lake 64 LLC, to vacate lots, Tract and
unnamed Right of Way in the Plat of Groveland Farms and execution of Resolution
No. 2008-81 with the addition of the following language: “This Resolution shall be effective upon
proof being provided to the Lake County Engineer that an ingress, egress and
utility easement of at least fifteen feet (15’) has been granted to the Ectors
which provides access to a publicly maintained road. Upon approval of such ingress, egress and
utility easement by the Lake County Engineer, he shall record an affidavit in
the Public Records of Lake County, Florida, which shall evidence that this
requirement has been fulfilled.”
PUBLIC
HEARINGS
Mr.
Brian Sheahan, Planning and Community Design Director, Growth Management
Department, addressed the Board stating that this hearing was properly noticed,
that there had been no changes to the Agenda from staff, and requested approval
of the Consent Agenda from the Board.
REZONING
CONSENT AGENDA
The
Chairman opened the public hearing regarding the Consent Agenda.
There
being no one who wished to address the Board regarding the Consent Agenda, the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
On
a motion by Commr. Stivender, seconded by Commr. Hill and carried unanimously
by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved the Rezoning Consent Agenda, Tabs 3, 4, 5, 7
and 8, as follows:
Ordinance
No. 2008-30
Shepherd
of the Hills
Lake
Rezoning
Case No. PH#24-08-2
Request
approval to amend Ordinance #2008-11 to establish building setbacks for the cellular communication tower compound within
this Community Facility District (CFD).
Ordinance
No. 2008-31
BCC Public Lands Manager David
Hansen
Rezoning Case No.PH#18-08-4
Request
approval to change the zoning of the property from Agriculture (A) to Community
Facilities District (CFD) for conservation and public passive recreation.
Ordinance
No. 2008-32
Lake
BCC Public Lands Manager David
Hansen
Rezoning Case No. PH#19-08-4
Request
approval to change the zoning of the property from Agriculture (A) to Community
Facilities District (CFD) for conservation and public passive recreation.
Ordinance No. 2008-33
Rezoning Case No.PH#27-08-1
Request approval to rezone 4.81
acre property from Agriculture (A) to Community Facilities District (CFD) and
revoke CUP Ordinance #888-2.
Staff Initiated Revocations of
Conditional Use Permits – Ordinance No. 2008-34
Sammy & Shirley Hart
CUP# 00/12/1-4
Revocation
of the terms and conditions of the CUP, which was for the placement of a mobile
home for the care of the infirm. The
mobile home was removed and no longer needed.(5+ acres)
Richard Reinertsen
CUP# 98/12/4-3
Revocation of the terms and uses
of the CUP, which permitted a dental lab as a home occupational use. The business is closed. (.5+/acres)
Kenneth Gill
CUP# 00/6/1-4
Revocation
of CUP issued to Sandy Hill Nursery (Donald Smith & Bonnie Oliver) for a
caretaker’s residence for a greenhouse/nursery operation. The CUP is no longer needed. (4 +/acres)
John Scharnhorst, et al
CUP# 02/10/1-5
Revocation
of CUP in Agriculture issued to Billy Scheller for an active commercial
recreation facility consisting of mud bogging.
Mud hole is closed and no longer needed.
(20 +/acres)
Luther Butts
CUP# 95/11/3-2
Revocation
of CUP issued to William & Betty Corman, for placement of a second mobile
home on site for the care of the infirm.
The mobile home was removed off the site. (5 +/acres)
Douglas Walker
CUP# 713-2
Revocation
of CUP in Agriculture which was issued to Liz Allan’s Ski School Ltd., since
new owners acquired the property the ski school ceased operation and is closed.
Eduardo Trejo
CUP# 99/9/2-3
Revocation
of the terms and uses of a CUP in Agriculture for a mobile home as a
caretaker’s / office with a grove operation.
The mobile home has been removed from the property. (8.25 +/acres)
Alice Midwood
CUP# 87/5/2-4
Revocation of CUP in Agriculture
for an Antique Shop. The owner no longer
desires the need for the home occupation use.
(5 +/acres)
Kurt & Cheryl Hoag
CUP# 999-3
Revocation
of the terms and uses of a CUP in M-1 (Heavy Industrial), issued to John
Reising, for the placement of a mobile home for a caretaker’s residence. Since acquiring the property by the new
owner, the mobile home has been removed and the CUP is not desired. (2.4 +/acres)
REZONING CASE NO. PH#42-07-3 –
SOUTH LAKE ANIMAL LEAGUE, INC.
Ms.
Stacy Allen, Senior Planner, Division of Planning and Community Design,
presented Ordinance No. 2008-35, Rezoning Case No. PH#42-07-3, Tab 1, stating
that the Applicant requested approval to rezone 14.2 acres of the 22.3-acre
site from the Community Facility District (CFD) to the Agriculture Zoning
District in order to request a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for an animal
shelter (kennel). She commented that
staff recommended approval of this rezoning request.
The
Chairman opened the public hearing.
There
being no one who wished to comment, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
On
a motion by Commr. Stivender, seconded by Commr. Hill and carried unanimously
by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved Rezoning Case PH#42-07-3, Tab 1, Ordinance
No. 2008-35, to rezone 14.2 acres of the 22.3-acre site from the Community Facility
District (CFD) to the Agriculture Zoning District in order to request a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for an animal shelter (kennel).
REZONING
CASE NO. CUP#17-08-3 – SOUTH LAKE ANIMAL LEAGUE, INC.
PATRICIA
PARKER, SOUTH LAKE ANIMAL LEAGUE, INC.
Ms.
Stacy Allen, Senior Planner, Division of Planning and Community Design,
presented Ordinance No. 2008-36, Rezoning Case No. CUP#17-8-03, Tab 2, stating
that the Applicant requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for caretakers
residence and to allow for an animal shelter for kennels for medical care,
rehabilitation, shelter, and adoption of cats and dogs. She commented that the subject parcel is 22.3
acres in size and located in the Mascotte area.
She stated that kennels are permitted in the Agriculture Zoning District
provided the conditions of the Land Development Regulations (LDR) are met. She remarked that in the LDR, the CUP shall
address the maximum number of animals to be permitted in the kennel, the required
setbacks, the impact which animal noise and odor may have on adjacent property
owners, and the provision for the removal of animal waste and sewage. She reported that based on the information
provided by the Applicant, the maximum number of animals on the site would be
50 cats and 75 dogs over the age of six months and 30 kittens and 30 puppies
under the age of six months. She
explained that the Applicant was proposing an 8900 square foot kennel facility
and has demonstrated that the kennel and all related structures shall meet the
200’ setback, as well as meeting the setbacks from all rights of way and
adjacent property boundaries. She
explained that animal noise upon adjacent properties is very difficult to
define, however, with the incorporation of building materials, fencing and
landscaping it may not be an issue.
Further, she commented that domestic and commercial waste must be
disposed of into a Department of Health or Lake County Health Department
approved system, and these items would be addressed in detail during the site
plan process. She stated that based on
these findings, staff recommends approval of this CUP request.
Commr.
Renick stated that she was happy they had a site located in a proper area, but stated
that 30 kittens make up five litters and suggested being more generous of the
request.
The
Chairman opened the public hearing.
Ms.
Patricia Parker, Administrator and Animal Care Coordinator, addressed the Board
stating that she would be delighted to take more kittens and puppies. She commented that they would be utilizing
foster homes in addition to the kennel to accommodate those very small kittens
or puppies that need to be bottle-fed.
Commr.
Stivender suggested having a maximum of 50 kittens and 50 puppies instead of 30
of each.
Mr.
Raymond Brooks, Vice President of The Animal League, addressed the Board and
questioned whether they agreed on language indicating an average.
Commr.
Renick stated that they had increased it to from 30 to 50 kittens and 50
puppies.
There
being no one present who wished to address the Board, the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
On
a motion by Commr. Stivender, seconded by Commr. Renick and carried unanimously
by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved Tab 2, Ordinance No. 2008-36, Rezoning Case
No. CUP#17-08-3, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the Agriculture Zoning
District to allow for an animal shelter for the shelter, medical care,
rehabilitation and adoption of cats and dogs (kennel), with an amendment to
Section 2 (a) and (b) increasing the maximum number of both kittens and puppies
under the age of six months from 30 to 50.
REZONING
CASE NO. PH#25-08-5 – LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE, INC. – DEWEY WILKEY,
Mr.
Steve K. Greene Chief Planner, Planning and Community Design, presented
Ordinance No. 2008-37, Rezoning Case No. PH#25-08-5, Tab 6, Loyal Order of
Moose, Inc., - Dewey Wilkey, Lake County P &CD, stating that during the
site plan consideration and review by staff it was determined that there was a
Scrivener’s error in the original CFD Ordinance 2001-80 and that the Applicant
requested approval to rescind said Ordinance 2001-80 with a new Ordinance to
correctly rezone the property from Agriculture (A) to Community Facility
District (CFD) in its entirety. He
reported that staff recommended approval of the Ordinance.
The
Chairman opened the public hearing.
There
being no one who wished to comment, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
On
a motion by Commr. Stewart, seconded by Commr. Stivender and carried
unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved Ordinance No. 2008-37, Tab 6,
rescinding Ordinance 2001-80 with a new Ordinance to correctly rezone the
property from Agriculture (A) to Community Facility District (CFD) in its
entirety.
REPORTS
–
LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
Mr. Sandy Minkoff,
On
a motion by Commr. Stivender, seconded by Commr. Stewart and carried
unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved the License Agreement between
Lake County and Mr. Frank Lee Porter, III, for the use of the lot across from
the Umatilla Health Clinic for parking at the Grand Opening of the Clinic on
June 5, 2008, without charge other than mowing the lot for safety purposes and
providing insurance coverage and indemnity within the limits of sovereign
immunity.
REPORTS
– COMMISSIONER RENICK – DISTRICT 2
DOMESTIC
SELF SUPPLY STUDY
Commr.
Renick distributed a handout reporting results from the meeting with St. John’s
River Water Management District (SJRWMD).
She stated that at the April 1, 2008, BCC Meeting there was a discussion
regarding the Domestic Self Supply Study and the Board had agreed to direct
staff to come back to discuss merits of changing the methodology presently used
in the Comprehensive Plan process versus an alternate methodology.
Ms.
Amye King, Growth Management Director, reported that Mr. Gregg Welstead,
Conservation and Compliance Director and his department have being working with
the other departments on the methodology behind the report, mentioning that the
Planning Directors throughout the cities and the county met to discuss it. She stated that she knew it was an ongoing
work-in-progress and that she would work with Ms. Hall to obtain a date for
completion of the work. She questioned
Commr. Renick with regard to reviewing the lower population numbers.
Commr.
Renick stated that they were possibly going to consider the other numbers.
Commr.
Cadwell stated that the numbers were a foundation to the Comprehensive Plan and
some type of analysis should be done regarding the effect those numbers would
have in all facets of planning.
Ms.
King mentioned that when those numbers were first derived they were comprised
of a partnership between all the County Departments, some Constitutional
Offices, and the cities. She commented
that those numbers came before the Board and the Department of Community
Affairs who then accepted them. She
stated that they now had new information and had found that the population
projections of the Bureau of Economic Business Research (BEBR) had increased
exponentially over what they were in 2004.
She suggested that they reconcile these numbers by taking what they were
in 2004, what BEBR currently projects, and report the differences to the Board. She commented that Commr. Cadwell mentioned
that many capital projects had been using the 2004 projections for the last
four years on the Comprehensive Plan.
Commr.
Renick stated that this was a discussion she would like to have and realized
that the Local Planning Agency (LPA) had been working on other ordinances and
thought they would be coming back to the
Future Land Use Map soon and that it needed to be resolved for that process.
Ms.
King stated that she completely understood, but that if the numbers the
Department of Community Affairs (DCA) had already accepted were not used they
would have to go back into negotiations with the DCA whether or not the numbers
were reduced or increased. She explained
that the DCA would have to accept the new numbers which generally takes a good
deal of time. She commented, however,
that she would reconcile the numbers.
REPORTS
– COMMISSIONER HILL – DISTRICT 1
IMPACT FEE CATEGORIES
Commissioner Hill stated that they have many requests for specific designation within the Impact Fee Categories. She commented that she realized the Strategic Plan had been completed and Ms. King was working with the LPA and the EDC to review them. She mentioned that no specific category existed for historic places within Districts, Cities, or the County. She stated that numerous people attempting to establish businesses by utilizing vacated areas, such as strip malls, had no specific category or the category itself was too vast. She explained that she would like attention called to this issue while going through the LPA process and working with the EDC in order to make the Impact Fee Committee aware of the need for specific business categories. She remarked, for example, that not all dining establishments fall under one of the three restaurant-designated categories and would like to request more specificity for designations of all businesses.
Commr. Cadwell stated that he currently sent a former beauty salon business for review which was now a barbeque establishment with ten chairs and no drive-through capabilities, and it was placed in the same category as McDonald’s.
Commr. Renick stated it was not just an historical issue, but rather a redevelopment issue and if they were going to be improving development, obstacles should not be thrown in its path.
Ms. King explained that staff would
consider this a Comprehensive Plan issue as much as a Land Development
Regulations (LDR) issue. She stated that
because redevelopment was an integral part of the Strategic Plan for Economic
Development, they would be partnering within their cluster toward economic
development and reviewing issues which were fairly new to
Ms.
Hall stated that she would contact Ms. Dottie Keedy, Economic Growth and
Redevelopment Director, to find out what could be done to assist redevelopment
occurring at this time.
Commr.
Hill commented that part of that was Strategic Plan but lacked detail as to
when and where to incorporate it and thought it should be addressed now.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to be brought to the attention of the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 11:10 a.m.
____________________________________
WELTON
G. CADWELL, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
__________________________
NEIL KELLY, CLERK