A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

october 4, 2011

The Lake County Board of County Commissioners met in regular session on Tuesday, October 4, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of County Commissioners’ Meeting Room, Lake County Administration Building, Tavares, Florida.  Commissioners present at the meeting were:  Jennifer Hill, Chairman; Leslie Campione, Vice Chairman; Sean Parks; Jimmy Conner; and Welton G. Cadwell.  Others present were:  Darren Gray, County Manager; Sanford A. “Sandy” Minkoff, County Attorney; Wendy Taylor, Executive Office Manager, County Manager’s Office; Barbara F. Lehman, Chief Deputy Clerk, County Finance; and Susan Boyajan, Deputy Clerk.

INVOCATION and pledge

Pastor David Miller from the Southpointe Baptist Church in Leesburg gave the Invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance.

Agenda update

Commr. Parks introduced a group of students with them that morning in the audience who wanted to learn about their local government.

Commr. Hill stated that she wanted to put under her business an item regarding discussion of appointees for the Central Florida Workforce.

Commr. Conner noted that he had a conflict of interest regarding an Addendum item.

Commr. Campione requested to place on the agenda under her reports a discussion about options they were considering for the sex offender ordinance.

On a motion by Commr. Conner, seconded by Commr. Parks and carried unanimously by a vote of 5-0, the Board voted to add that to the Agenda.

approval of sales surtax oversight advisory report

Mr. Keith Mullins, Chairman of the Sales Surtax Oversight Advisory Committee for Lake County, explained that the citizens of Lake County passed a 1 cent sales tax in 2001 to be split three ways among the County Commission, the 14 municipalities, and the School Board, and along with that tax a citizens oversight committee was appointed to be sure that those entities were spending the tax the way it was intended to be spent by the electorate.  He related that the committee meets every six months to look at how the government agencies spent their tax money in the previous year and how the sales tax would be spent in the upcoming fiscal year, giving their suggestions to make sure it was meeting the spirit of what the citizens wanted.  He reported that they had a quorum as a properly-advertised meeting; however, there was no public input that was offered.

On a motion by Commr. Cadwell, seconded by Commr. Parks and carried unanimously by a vote of 5-0, the Board approved the Sales Surtax Oversight Advisory report.

Acknowledgement of distinguished service award

Mr. Gregg Welstead, Conservation and Compliance Director, recapped that last month at this time he had recognized Ms. Stephanie Glass, Teen Court Coordinator, for receiving both the State and local Distinguished Service Award in Juvenile Justice from the Florida Council on Crime and Delinquency, and he reported that Ms. Glass has now been awarded the Don Davis Public Service Award from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention with the Department of Justice, which was a prestigious award.  He noted that this was a peer nomination only, and anyone that was directly affiliated with her was not eligible to nominate her for this award.  He added that this was the first year of the award, and she would be going to the Washington DC area to receive it later this month.  He elaborated that Ms. Glass was responsible for diverting teens who otherwise would go to the court system into a juvenile justice program which allows them to be judged by their peers and still be held responsible for their actions but without developing a criminal record, and the teens who go through this program generally do not repeat their offenses.

Ms. Glass thanked everyone for their support and encouragement and commented that it was such an honor for Lake County to receive this award because all of the achievements are a result of the teamwork, cooperation and collaboration between the Commissioners, the School Board, the Clerk, the Sheriff’s Department, State Attorney’s Office, and Public Defender’s Office.

Employee awards

Ms. Mary Makovec, Employee Services Manager, presented the following employee awards:

Five years

Katie Keele, Animal Euthanasia Technician

Conservation & Compliance/Animal Services

 

Dolly Malburg, Landfill Attendant

Public Works/Solid Waste Division

             

Wendell Nichols, Equipment Operator II

Public Works/Road Operations/Maintenance Area II (Minneola)

 

Shelia Sinclair, Landfill Attendant (not present)

Public Works/Solid Waste Division

Information Technology/Telecommunications Division

 

TEN YEARS

Shannon Bush, Fire Lieutenant/EMT

Public Safety/Fire Rescue

 

Robert Isom, Firefighter/EMT (not present)

Public Safety/Fire Rescue

 

Anna Lawver, Office Associate V (not present)

Facilities Development & Management

 

Kara Miller, Fire Lieutenant/Paramedic

Public Safety/Fire Rescue

 

Mark Ricci, Fire Lieutenant/EMT

Public Safety/Fire Rescue

 

 

Jennifer Roland, Firefighter/EMT

Public Safety/Fire Rescue

 

Thomas Rose, Fairgrounds Aide (not present)

Public Resources/Fairgrounds

 

Edward Simon, Firefighter/EMT

Public Safety/Fire Rescue

 

TWENTY YEARS

Mr. Jim Stivender, Public Works Director, presented the following employee award, commenting briefly about the employee’s service to the County:

Russell Cheatham, Biological Technician

Public Works/Funding & Production Division Mosquito Management

 

RETIREMENT 

Ms. Wendy Breeden, Public Resources Director, presented the following employee award, commenting briefly about his service to the County:

Jack Todd, Fairgrounds Aide

Public Resources/Fairgrounds

MINUTE APPROVAL

On a motion by Commr. Parks, seconded by Commr. Campione, and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved the Minutes of August 23, 2011 (Regular Meeting) and August 30, 2011 (Special Joint Meeting) as presented.

CITIZEN QUESTION AND COMMENT PERIOD

Mr. Vance Jochim, a resident of Tavares who writes a blog on fiscal issues, addressed the Board to express concern regarding the approval of the subsidy mentioned in Tab 4 of two LYNX routes going from South Lake to the Orlando area with a fiscal impact of $225,000 and no requirement for measurement of performance of those routes by staff, including whether they are doing better or worse concerning cost per rider, how much they were subsidizing per rider, or growth and decline in ridership.  He suggested that the Board seriously consider asking staff to start preparing metrics like that when asked to subsidize something for an indefinite amount of time, as well as consider sunset provisions for those types of expenditures.

Ms. Nancy Fullerton, a resident of Clermont and representative for Alliance to Protect Water Resources, related that their organization has been involved in getting a stormwater utility in the county similar to what some of the cities have, and she expressed concern regarding the small percentage of the MSTU money being spent for stormwater projects, while the majority of those funds are being used for parks  She mentioned that the stormwater tax was initiated in 1999 and was initially solely used for stormwater and that she had asked the Board in 2008 to evaluate their stormwater program, since she believed that the stormwater money was being used in other areas even though this tax was specifically designated to control the pollution of their lakes from various stormwater problems.  She also indicated that there were many projects that this tax could be used for now, and she reported that the current 2011 distribution is 12 percent for stormwater and 88 percent for the parks program.  She requested that the Board put the money back into the stormwater funding and spend all of the tax money on protecting and cleaning their lakes.

Ms. Christine Harris, a resident of Mount Dora, discussed their Community Development Block Grant regarding homes and utility infrastructure, and she reviewed the City of Mount Dora’s redevelopment plan and noted that they have spent $898,000 received from FEMA.

CLERK OF COURTS’ CONSENT AGENDA

On a motion by Commr. Conner, seconded by Commr. Parks and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved the Clerk of Courts’ Consent Agenda, Items 1 through 5, as follows:

List of Warrants

Request to acknowledge receipt of list of warrants paid prior to this meeting, pursuant to Chapter 136.06 (1) of the Florida Statutes, which shall be incorporated into the Minutes as attached Exhibit A and filed in the Board Support Division of the Clerk’s Office.

Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement

Request to acknowledge receipt of copy of an Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement, together with an Affidavit regarding authenticity, executed by several different governmental agencies throughout the State of Florida for the purpose of providing insurance through Public Risk Management of Florida (PRM).  These are submitted in compliance with Florida Statute Section 163.01.

Budget for Village Center Community Development District for FY 2011/12

Request to acknowledge receipt of copy of the adopted budget for the Village Center Community Development District for the Fiscal Year 2011/2012 submitted in accordance with Chapter 190.008(2)(b)(c), Florida Statutes.

Southwest Florida Water Management District Calendar for FY 2012

Request to acknowledge receipt of Southwest Florida Water Management District’s Fiscal Year 2012 Board Meeting Calendar and map depicting the District’s boundaries submitted as required by Chapter 189.417, Florida Statutes.

Audit Charter from Internal Audit Department

Request for approval of Audit Charter from the Internal Audit Department of the Lake County Clerk of the Circuit Court.

COUNTY MANAGER’S CONSENT AGENDA

Commr. Campione clarified that there were no funds involved in Addendum 1-IA and that they were just showing their support for the members of the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council (ECFRPC).

Commr. Conner pointed out that Tab 12 showed a partnership with the City of Mascotte and commented that he would have recommended not approving that agreement if the landfill had been approved last night by the city council, but is in favor of it since it was not approved.

On a motion by Commr. Cadwell, seconded by Commr. Campione and carried unanimously by a vote of 5-0, the Board approved the County Manager’s Consent Agenda, Tabs 4 through 15 and Addendum 1-IA, as follows:

Community Services

Request for approval and signature on the Agreement between the Lake County Board of County Commissioners and LYNX to continue the transportation operations of Links 204 and 55 in South Lake County from October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012. The fiscal impact is $225,426.00 (County).

Request for approval and signature on Resolution No. 2011-148 adopting the Lake County Health Department Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2011/2012.

Request for approval and authorization for the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to sign the contract between Lake County and the State of Florida Department of Health for operation of the Lake County Health Department. The contract is effective 10/1/11 through 9/30/12. The fiscal impact is $359,813.00.

County Manager

Request for approval of employment of Mr. Gary K. England, Extension Agent III, Fruit Crops.

Request for authorization to fill one Program Associate position in the Conservation & Compliance Department/Probation Division. The fiscal impact is $44,533.

Employee Services

Request for approval to observe December 24, 2012 and December 31, 2012 as holidays during the calendar year 2012 holiday schedule.

Public Resources

Request for approval and signature of Proclamation No. 2011-149 to show observance of 4-H week in Lake County October 2 – 8, 2011. No fiscal impact.

Public Safety

Request for approval starting in Fiscal Year 2011/2012 of the updated Interlocal Agreement with the City of Groveland for First Responder Fire Rescue Services in which the County shall reimburse the City a total of $91,382.00 per annum for the fire rescue services provided to the County.

Request for approval starting in FY 2011/12 of the updated Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mascotte for First Responder Fire Rescue Services in which the County shall reimburse the City a total of $78,388.00 per annum for the fire rescue services provided to the County.

Request for approval and execution of: (1) Resolution No. 2011-150 to accept Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) grant funding in the amount of $130,173, by the Lake County Board of County Commissioners; and (2) Authorization for the County Manager to sign future amendments/modifications that do not involve financial impact. No local match is required.

Public Works

Request for approval and execution of an amendment to the purchase agreement with CSX Real Property, Inc. for several pieces of abandoned railroad property, in conjunction with the South Lake Trail-Phase 3 project in the Groveland area. The changes include updating offer acceptance and contingency completion dates and adding language to reserve an easement in area of Florida Power Crossing Agreement. No fiscal impact. Commission District 3.

Request for approval and execution of an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Umatilla for reimbursement for funds spent for a portion of the overall right of way property purchase with CSX for the CR450/Hatfield Drive Improvement Project. Fiscal impact not to exceed $79,000.00.

Addendum No. 1-IA

Request for approval of agreement establishing a Consortium for the Application for a HUD Sustainable Communities Planning Grant.

Ms. Wendy Breeden, Community Resources Director, thanked the Board for approving the Proclamation in Tab 10 supporting the 4-H week in Lake County of October 2 through 8, introduced some 4-H agents, and recognized the 4-H members in attendance.  She commented that 4-H week is a wonderful opportunity for 4-H youth in Lake County to get the word out about the program, and she specified that more than 5900 4-H members and 253 volunteers were involved in the program in Lake County.  She stated that the fundamental 4-H ideal of learning by doing and the experiences encourage youth to experiment and think independently.

COUNTY ATTORNEY’S CONSENT AGENDA

On a motion by Commr. Cadwell, seconded by Commr. Conner, and carried unanimously by a vote of 5-0, the Board approved the County Attorney’s Consent Agenda, Tabs 16 and 17 as follows:

Request for authorization to fill one (1) vacant Office Associate V position in the County Attorney's Office.  Fiscal Impact: $40,265.59.

Request for approval of District Office Lease to provide office space for Congressman Daniel Webster at the Clerk's Public Records Center located at 122 E. Main Street, Tavares.

Presentations

proclamation for fire prevention week

Mr. John Jolliff, Director of Public Safety and Fire Chief, requested approval for a proclamation recognizing October 9 through October 15 as the 91^st annual National Fire Prevention Week.  He reported that homes are the locations where people are at the greatest risk, and home fires at the national level are responded to every 87 seconds.  He mentioned that this year the Fire Prevention Week theme is “Protect Your Family From Fire.”

On a motion by Commr. Conner, seconded by Commr. Parks and carried unanimously by a vote of 5-0, the Board approved Proclamation No. 2011-143 for Fire Prevention Week 2011 from October 9 through October 15, 2011.  No Fiscal Impact.

Public hearings

adoption of resolution regarding redistricting

Mr. Gray informed the Board that the actual resolution and the legal description for the new district map were attached in their agenda for discussion and approval.

The Chairman opened the public hearing.

Ms. Bonnie Neville, the Mayor Pro Temp of Howey in the Hills, opined that being changed to District 1 would put their town at a great disadvantage, and she related that the Town, including the mayor and the town council, was very unhappy about that change.

There being no one else who wished to address the Board, the Chairman closed the public hearing.

Mr. Gray explained that the first map they looked at separated the districts by census tracks, but when the Public Works Office was putting the legal together, they used roads as the boundaries, since some of the census tracks went right through neighborhoods, as well as making a few modifications that did not alter the map significantly.

Mr. Jim Stivender, Public Works Director, noted that they went across rather than around Lake Gertrude, and he wanted to make the legal description as simple as possible.  He indicated on the overhead monitor that the pink mark was the census track and the yellow mark was the legal description that they wrote.

Commr. Campione pointed out that they were required by state law to draw these districts so that there were essentially an equal number of people within each district, and although their district determined where a Commissioner must live within that district, they were all elected county-wide and responsible for all of Lake County and did not divvy out services.

Commr. Hill commented that that was a point well taken and that they were a representative board who looked at the good of the entire county while looking at any issue.

Commr. Cadwell expressed concern about District 1 on the map.

Commr. Campione responded that there was no way to divide the map to be geographically consolidated, because they have areas with extremely low densities that needed to be included within a district.

Commr. Conner objected to the map and the way they reconsidered the vote regarding the map during the budget meeting after the public hearing was over.  He opined that there were major changes in map 2b, and he believed that Howey in the Hills was part of central Lake County rather than South Lake County.  He pointed out that the map did not honor what that Town’s wishes were.  He related that many people that were at the public hearing that day have expressed to him that they feel they were blindsided and circumvented, and he indicated that he would not be supporting this map.

Commr. Parks commented that nothing was up for reconsideration at the budget hearing that evening, but he mentioned at that time he did not think there was a reason to make staff do hours worth of work for a legal description on a map that they were not supporting.  He stated that he was supportive of map 2b, and he believed the process was done according to law, that they have tried to be as open about this as possible, and that they had public input that was provided on several occasions.

Commr. Campione commented that she understood that there were already three votes in support of map 2b, but Commr. Conner also wanted a legal description for map 2 as well to keep that option alive, although she believed at the time that it would be a lot of work to do that.  She opined that she believed Commr. Parks was trying to be practical and save staff time when he mentioned at the budget meeting that he would not favor writing a separate legal description for map 2.  She also mentioned that map 2 had Groveland in what he had called a central district and that she believed that Commr. Conner had asked people to send the Board e-mails asking for him to remain their district Commissioner.  She pointed out that the School Board specifically stated that they would not take into account where sitting commissioners lived when they drew their district boundaries, which she commented was an honorable thing to do, and she recommended that future County Commissions do that.  She concluded that this was their attempt to try to meet as much as they could halfway to come up with a solution to all of the different requests that they have received.

On a motion by Commr. Campione, seconded by Commr. Parks and carried by a vote of 3-2, the Board approved Map 2b and Resolution No. 2011-151 regarding redistricting, changing the boundaries of the five County Commission Districts, and which includes that a certified copy of the minutes incorporating the County Commission District boundaries be published once each week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper published in Lake County, Florida. 

Commr. Conner and Commr. Cadwell voted “no.”

Accurate descriptions of the five County Commission Districts are as follows:

EXHIBIT A

Lake County Commission District No. 1 – Legal Description

BEGIN at the intersection of State Road 44 and the West line of Section 19, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, said Section line being the dividing line between Sumter County and Lake County, and the Range line dividing Range 24 East and Range 23 East; thence run Southerly along said Range line to the Southwest corner of Section 31, Township 24 South, Range 24 East, thence run Easterly along Township line dividing Townships 24 South and 25 South, said line also being the dividing line between Polk County and Lake County, to the Southeast corner of Section 36, Township 24 South, Range 24 East, thence run Northerly to the Southwest corner of Section 30, Township 24 South, Range 25 East, thence run Easterly to the Southeast corner of Section 27, Township 24 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southerly to the Southwest corner of Section 35, Township 24 South, Range 25 East, said point being the aforesaid dividing Township line, thence run Easterly along said dividing Township line to the Southeast corner of Section 36, Township 24 South, Range 26 East, thence run North along the Range line dividing Range 26 East and Range 27 East , being the dividing line between Orange County and Lake County, to the Northeast corner of Section 12, Township 24 South, Range 26 East, thence run Westerly along the North line of Sections 10, 11, and 12 of Township 24 South, Range 26 East to the intersection with US Hwy 27, thence run Northerly along the centerline of US Hwy 27 to the intersection with the South line of the North 1/2 of the Northwest ¼ of Section 21, Township 23 South, Range 26 East, thence run Westerly along said South line to the Southeast corner of the Northeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of Section 20, Township 23 South, Range 26 East, thence run Westerly along the South line of the North ¼ of Sections 20 and 19 of Township 23 South, Range 26 East and Sections 24 and 23 of Township 23 South , Range 25 East to the Southwest corner of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of Section 23, Township 23 South, Range 25 East, thence run Northerly along the West line of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ to a point on the North line of said Section 23, thence run Northerly along the East line of the West ½ of Section 14, Township 23 South, Range 25 East to the intersection with County Road #1040 (Lakeshore Drive), thence run Northeasterly along the centerline of Lakeshore Drive to the center of the bridge at County Road #1040 (Lakeshore Drive) between Lake Minnehaha and Lake Susan, lying in the Northwest ¼ of the Northwest ¼ of Section 6, Township 23 South, Range 26 East, thence run Northwesterly along the thread of the channel leading to the South shore of Lake Minnehaha, thence run Northwesterly across the open waters of Lake Minnehaha to the center of the Bridge at County Road 561 between Lake Minnehaha and Lake Palatlakaha, lying in the Southeast ¼ of the Northwest ¼ of Section 26, Township 22 South, Range 25 East, thence run Northerly across the waters of Lake Palatlakaha to the Palatlakaha River, thence run Northerly along the thread of the Palatlakaha River to the center of the Bridge at State Road 50, lying in the Northeast ¼ of the Southwest ¼ of Section 23, Township 22 South, Range 25 East, thence continue Northerly along the thread of the Palatlakaha River to the intersection with the East line of the West 1/2 of said Section 23, thence run Northerly along said East line to a point on the North line of said Section 23, thence run Westerly along said North line to the Southwest corner of Section 14, Township 22 South, Range 25 East, thence run Northerly along the West line of said Section 14 to the intersection with County Road 565A, thence run Easterly along the centerline of CR 565A to the intersection with County Road 561, also known as County Road # 1733 (Lake Minneola Shores), thence run Northerly and Easterly along the centerline of CR561 to the intersection with County Road #1838 (Jalarmy Road), thence run Northerly along the centerline of Jalarmy Road to the intersection with County Road #1829 (Cherry Lake Road), thence run Easterly along the centerline of Cherry Lake Road to the intersection with County Road #2038 (East Apshawa Road), thence run Northerly and Easterly along the centerline of East Apshawa Road to the Easterly extension of said Road in a straight line to US Hwy 27, said Easterly extension being close to a point on the North line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast ¼ of Section 36, Township 21 South, Range 25 East, thence run Northerly along the centerline of US Hwy 27 to the intersection with County Road 561, thence run Northeasterly along the centerline of CR 561 to the intersection with the State Road 91 (Florida Turnpike), thence run Southeasterly along the centerline of the Florida Turnpike to the intersection with the West line of Section 32, Township 21 South, Range 26 East, thence run Northerly along said West line to the Northwest corner of said Section 32, thence run Easterly to the Northeast corner of the Northwest ¼ of said Section 32, thence run Northerly along the East line of the West ½ of Sections 29 and 20 of Township 21 South, Range 26 East to a point on the North line of said Section 20, thence run Easterly along said North line to the intersection with County Road 455, thence run Northwesterly and Westerly along the centerline of CR 455 to the intersection with County Road # 561, being a point on the North line of Section 17, Township 21 South, Range 26 East, thence run Northerly along the centerline of CR561 to the North line of Section 8, Township 21 South, Range 26 East, thence run Westerly along the North line of said Section 8 and Section 7, Township 21 South, Range 26 East to the Southwest corner of Section 6, Township 21 South, Range 26 East, thence run Northerly along the West lines of said Section 6, and Sections 31, 30, and 19 of Township 20 South, Range 26 East to the Northeast corner of Section 24, Township 20 South, Range 25 East, thence run Westerly along the North line of said Section 24 and Section 23, Township 20 South, Range 25 East across the waters of Lake Harris to a point 2,000 feet, more or less, East of the Northwest corner of said Section 23, thence run Southwesterly to the Northwest corner of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 23, thence run Southerly along the West line of said Section 23 and Section 26,Township 20 South, Range 25 East to the intersection with County Road #3024 (Number Two Road), thence run Westerly and Northerly along the centerline of Number Two Road to the intersection with the East line of Section 28,Township 20 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southerly along the East line of said Section 28 and the East line of Section 33, Township 20 South, Range 25 East to the Southeast corner of said Section 33, thence run Westerly along said North line to the Northeast corner of Section 4,Township 21 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southerly to the Southeast corner of said Section 4 and the intersection with County Road #2729 (East Dewey Robbins Road), thence run Westerly along the centerline of East Dewey Robbins Road to the intersection with County Road #2625 (South Dewey Robbins Road), thence run Northerly along the centerline of South Dewey Robbins Road to the intersection with County Road #2824 (Dewey Robbins Road), thence run Westerly along the centerline of Dewey Robbins Road to the intersection with US Hwy 27, thence run Southerly along the centerline of US Hwy 27 to a point on the North line of the Southwest ¼ of Section 18, Township 21 South, Range 25 East, thence run Westerly along said North line to the intersection with the East boundary line of the Plat of Royal Highlands Phase 1-C-A recorded in Plat Book 40 Pages 34-38, thence run Southerly, Westerly, and Northerly along the Southern boundary lines of said plat in Section 18, Township 21 South, Range 25 East to the intersection with the South boundary line of the Plat of Royal Highlands, Phase 1, recorded in Plat Book 37 Pages 3-8, thence run Westerly along the Southern boundary lines of said plat to the intersection with the East boundary line of the Plat of Royal Highlands, Phase 1-B as recorded in Plat Book 39, Pages 32-36, thence run Southerly along the East line of said plat to the intersection of the Plat of Royal Highlands Phase 1-C-A recorded in Plat Book 40 Pages 34-38 ,said point also being the intersection with the North line of Section 24, Township 21 South, Range 24 East, thence run Westerly along the South boundary line of said plat to the intersection with the Plat of Royal Highlands Phase 2-B as recorded in Plat Book 50, Pages 30-34, thence run Southerly, Westerly, and Northerly along Southern boundary lines of said plat to the intersection with the Plat of Royal Highlands Phase 1-E as recorded in Plat Book 43 Pages 66-69 , thence run Northeasterly along the Southern boundary line of said plat to the intersection with the Plat of Royal Highlands Phase 2-A as recorded in Plat Book 46, Pages 59-63, thence run Southerly and Westerly along the Southern boundary lines of said Plat to a point on the North line of Section 23, Township 21 South, Range 24 East, thence Run Westerly along said North line to the Northwest corner of said Section 23, thence run Westerly along the North line of Section 22, Township 21 South, Range 24 East to the intersection with County Road 33, thence run Northerly along the centerline of CR 33 to the intersection with County Road 48,located in Section 15, Township 20 South, Range 24 East, thence run Easterly along the centerline of CR 48 to the intersection with US Hwy 27, thence run Northerly along the centerline of US Hwy 27 to the Southwest corner of Section 14, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, thence run Northerly along the West line of said Section 14 to the Northwest corner of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 14, thence run Easterly along the North line of said mid Section to the West shore of Lake Griffin, thence run Northerly along the shore line of Lake Griffin to the North line of Section 14, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, thence run Westerly to the Northeast corner of Section 15, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, thence run Westerly along the North line of said Section 15 to the intersection with County Road #5710 (Picciola Road), thence run Southerly along the centerline of Picciola Road to the intersection with County Road #5309 (Indian Trail), thence run Westerly and Southwesterly along the centerline of Indian Trail to the intersection with US Hwy 27, thence run Northwesterly along the centerline of US Hwy 27 to the intersection with County Road #5507 (Dixie Avenue), also known as CR25A, thence run Northwesterly along the centerline of Dixie Avenue to the intersection with County Road #5407 (Urick Street), thence run Westerly and Northerly along the centerline of Urick Street to the intersection with County Road 468, thence run Southerly along the centerline of CR 468 to the intersection with County Road #5105 (Lewis Road), thence run Westerly and Southerly along the centerline of Lewis Road to the intersection with County Road #4603 (Whitney Road) located on the North line of Section 20, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, thence run Westerly and Southerly along Whitney Road, also described as running Westerly along the North line and Southerly along the West line of said Section 20 to the intersection with State Road 44, thence run Northeasterly along the centerline of State Road 44 to the West line of said Section 19 to the Point of Beginning, and the Terminus of this description.

EXHIBIT B

Lake County Commission District No. 2 – Legal Description

BEGIN at the Northeast corner of Section 12, Township 24 South, Range 26 East, said Range line dividing Ranges 26 East and Range 27 East, said line also being the dividing line between Orange County and Lake County, thence run North to the south shore of Lake Apopka, thence run North across the waters of Lake Apopka, taking in all islands and peninsulas along the west shore of said lake to the north shore of Lake Apopka where it is intersected by aforesaid Range line, thence run Southwesterly along the shoreline of Lake Apopka to a point on the North line of Section 14, Township 21 South, Range 26 East, thence run Westerly along the North line of Sections 14, 15, 16, and 17, Township 21 South, Range 26 East to the intersection with County Road 455, thence run Southerly to the centerline of CR 455, thence run Southeasterly along said centerline to the North line of Section 20 Township 21 South, Range 26 East, thence run Westerly along the North line of said Section 20 to a point on the East line of the West ½ of said Section 20, thence run Southerly along the East line of the West ½ of Sections 20 and 29 of Township 21 South, Range 26 East to a point on the North line of Section 32, Township 21 South, Range 26 East, thence run Westerly along said North line to the Northwest corner of said Section 32, thence run Southerly along the West line of said Section 32 to the intersection with the Florida Turnpike, thence run Northwesterly along the centerline of the State Road 91 (Florida Turnpike) to the intersection with County Road 561, thence run Southwesterly along the centerline of CR 561 to the intersection with US Hwy 27, thence run Southerly along the centerline of US Hwy 27 to a point on the North line of the Southeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of Section 36, Township 21 South, Range 25 East , said line also being a point on the Easterly extension in a straight line of County Road #2038 (East Apshawa Road), thence run Westerly along said extension to the centerline of East Apshawa Road, thence run Westerly and Southerly along the centerline of East Apshawa Road to the intersection with County Road #1829 (Cherry Lake Road), thence run Westerly along the centerline of Cherry Lake Road to the intersection with County Road # 1838 (Jalarmy Road), thence run Southerly along the centerline of Jalarmy Road to the intersection with County Road 561, also known as County Road # 1733 (Lake Minneola Shores), thence run Westerly and Southerly along the centerline of CR 561 to the intersection with County Road 565A, thence run Westerly along the centerline of CR 565A to the West line of Section 14, Township 22 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southerly along said West line to the Southwest Corner of said Section 14, thence run Easterly along the South line of said Section 14 to a point on the East line of the West 1/2 of Section 23, Township 22 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southerly along said East line to the intersection with the Palatlakaha River, thence run Southerly along the thread of the Palatlakaha River to the center of the Bridge at State Road 50, lying in the Northeast ¼ of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 23, thence continue Southerly along the thread of the Palatlakaha River to the waters of Lake Palatlakaha, thence run Southerly across the waters of Lake Palatlakaha to the center of the Bridge at County Road 561 between Lake Palatlakaha and Lake Minnehaha, thence run Southeasterly across the open waters of Lake Minnehaha to the center of the bridge at County Road #1040 (Lakeshore Drive) between Lake Minnehaha and Lake Susan, thence run Southwesterly along the centerline of Lakeshore Drive to the intersection with the East line of the West ½ of Section 14, Township 23 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southerly along said East line to a point on the North line of Section 23, Township 23 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southerly along the East line of the West ½ of said Section 23 to the Southwest corner of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of said Section 23, thence run Easterly along the South line of the North ¼ of Sections 23 and 24, of Township 23 South, Range 25 East, and Sections 19, 20, and 21 of Township 23 South, Range 26 East to the intersection with US Hwy 27, thence run Southerly along the centerline of US Hwy 27 to the intersection with the North line of Section 10, Township 24 South, Range 26 East, thence run Easterly along the North line of Sections 10, 11, and 12 of Township 24 South, Range 26 East to the Northeast Corner of said Section 12 to the Point of Beginning, and the Terminus of this description.

EXHIBIT C

Lake County Commission District No. 3 – Legal Description

COMMENCE at the Southeast corner of Section 1, Township 21 South, Range 26 East, said Range line dividing Range 26 East and Range 27 East, also being the dividing line between Orange County and Lake County, thence run North along the East line of said Section 1 to the intersection with the north shore of Lake Apopka in said Section 1 and the POINT OF BEGINNING, thence run Northerly along said Range line to the North shore of Lake Beauclaire, lying on the West line of the Northwest ¼ of Section 6, Township 20 South, Range 27 East, thence run Easterly and Northerly along the North shoreline of Lake Beauclaire to the intersection with the North line of said Section 6, thence run Easterly along the North line of said Section 6 to the intersection with the East shore of Lake Beauclaire, thence run Northwesterly and Southwesterly along the arc of a curve concave to the South running through the center of the open waters of Lake Dora to a point on the East line of Section 35, Township 19 South, Range 26 East, said point lying 300 feet, more or less, North of the Southeast corner of said Section 35, said point also being the point of reverse curvature, said curve concave to the North, thence run through the center of the open waters of Lake Dora Southwesterly and Northwesterly along the arc of said curve to the Northeast corner of the Southwest ¼ of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 35, thence run Northerly along the East line of the West ½ of the West ½ of said Section 35 to the North line of said Section 35, also being a point on County Road #4260 (Bay Road), thence run North along the centerline of Bay Road to the intersection with County Road #0500A (Old 441), thence run Westerly along the centerline of Old 441 to the West line of Section 26, Township 19 South, Range 26 East, thence run Northerly along the West line of said Section 26 and the West line of Section 23, Township 19 South, Range 26 East to the intersection with the North shore of Lake Saunders, thence run Westerly along the shoreline of Lake Saunders to a point due South of the West line of the Plat of Lake Saunders Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 4 Page 30, thence run North to the Southwest corner of said plat, thence run North along the West line of said plat to the intersection with County Road 19A (Dora Avenue) and County Road #4858 (Dillard Road), thence run North along the centerline of Dillard Road to the intersection with US Hwy 441, thence run Westerly along US Hwy 441 to the centerline of the CSX Railroad , formerly known as the Seaboard Coastline Railroad, said railroad lying parallel to County Road # 4956 (Mt Homer Road) and County Road #4756 (David Walker Road) in Section 22 and Section 15 of Township 19 South, Range 26 East, run thence Northerly along the centerline of the CSX Railroad to the intersection with Clay Blvd, lying in said Section 15, thence run Westerly along the centerline of Clay Blvd to the intersection with County Road #5154 (Lakeshore Drive), thence run Southwesterly along the centerline of Lakeshore Drive to the West line of the plat of Hermosa Shores as recorded in Plat Book 21 Page 49, thence run Northwesterly along said West line to the Northwest corner of said plat, thence run Southwesterly along the Northwesterly boundary of the plat of Webb & Riddle as recorded in Plat Book 3 Page 18 to the Northwest corner of said plat, thence run Northwesterly across the open waters of Lake Eustis to intersect with Haynes Creek on the East line of Section 12, Township 19 South, Range 25 East, thence run Northerly and Westerly along the thread of Haynes Creek to the intersection of the bridge at County Road 44 and the most Southwesterly leg of Haynes Creek in the Northwest ¼ of the Northwest ¼ of Section 2, Township 19 South, Range 25 East, thence continue Northerly along the thread of Haynes Creek to the intersection with East shore of Lake Griffin, located in the Southeast ¼ of Section 29, Township 18 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southwesterly across the open waters of Lake Griffin to the most Western point of the plat of Treasure Island as recorded in Plat Book 27 Page 90 lying in Section 6, Township 19 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southwesterly across the open waters of Lake Griffin to the most Southerly point of Block J (now vacated) of the plat of Picciola Island Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 14 Page 19, lying in Section 13, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, thence run Southwesterly across the open waters of Lake Griffin to the intersection with the South line of Section 14, Township 19 South, Range 24 East and the Western shore of Lake Griffin, thence run Northerly and Westerly along the shoreline of Lake Griffin to a point on the North line of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 14, lying 1,800 feet, more or less, from the Northwest corner of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 14, thence run Westerly along the North line of said Southwest ¼ of Section 14 to the Northwest corner of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 14, thence run South along the West line of said Section 14 to the Southwest corner of said Section 14, also being the intersection of County Road 44A (Griffin Road) and US Hwy 27, thence run Southerly  along the centerline of US Hwy 27 to the intersection with County Road 48, lying in Section 14, Township 20 South, Range 24 East, thence run Westerly along the centerline of CR 48 to the intersection with County Road 33, thence run Southerly along the centerline of CR 33 to the intersection with the North line of Section 22, Township 21 South, Range 24 East, then run Easterly along said North line to the Northwest corner of Section 23, Township 21 South, Range 24 East, thence run Easterly along the North line of said Section 23 to the intersection with the Plat of Royal Highlands Phase 2-A as recorded in Plat Book 46, Pages 59-63, thence run Southerly and Easterly along the Southern boundary lines of said plat to the intersection with in the Plat of Royal Highlands Phase 1-E as recorded in Plat Book 43 Pages 66-69, thence run Southeasterly along the Southern boundary line of said plat to the intersection with the Plat of Royal Highlands Phase 2-B as recorded in Plat Book 50, Pages 30-34, thence run Southerly, Easterly, and Northerly along the Southern boundary lines of said plat to the intersection with the Plat of Royal Highlands Phase 1-C-A as recorded in Plat Book 40 Pages 34-38 , lying in Section 13, Township 21 South, Range 24 East, thence run Easterly along the South boundary line of said plat to the intersection with the East boundary line of the Plat of Royal Highlands, Phase 1-B as recorded in Plat Book 39, Pages 32-36, thence run Northerly along the East line of said plat to the intersection with the South boundary line of the Plat of Royal Highlands, Phase 1, recorded in Plat Book 37 Pages 3-8, thence run Easterly along the Southern boundary lines of said plat to the intersection with Plat of Royal Highlands Phase 1-C-A as recorded in Plat Book 40 Pages 34-38, lying in Section 18, Township 21 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southerly, Easterly, and Northerly along the Southern boundary lines of said plat in to the intersection with the North line of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 18, thence run Easterly along said North line to the intersection with US Hwy 27, thence run Northerly along the centerline of US Hwy 27 to the intersection with County Road #2824 (Dewey Robbins Road), thence run Easterly along the centerline of Dewey Robbins Road to the intersection with County Road #2625 (South Dewey Robbins Road), thence run Southerly along the centerline of South Dewey Robbins Road to the intersection with County Road #2729 (East Dewey Robbins Road), thence run Easterly along the centerline of East Dewey Robbins Road to the Southeast corner of Section 4, Township 21 South, Range 25 East, thence run Northerly along the East line of said Section 4 to the Northeast corner of said Section 4, thence run Easterly to the Southwest corner of Section 34, Township 20 South, Range 25 East , thence run Northerly along the West line of said Section 34 and Section 27, Township 20 South, Range 25 East to the intersection with County Road #3024 (Number Two Road), thence run Easterly and Southerly along the centerline of Number Two Road to the West line of Section 26, Township 20 South, Range 25 East, thence run Northerly along the West line of said Section 26 and the West line of Section 23, Township 20 South, Range 25 East to the Northwest corner of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 23, thence run Northeasterly to a point on the North line of said Section 23, said point lying 2,000 feet, more or less East of the Northwest corner of said Section 23, thence run Easterly along the North line of said Section 23 and the North line of Section 24, Township 20 South, Range 25 East across the open waters of Little Lake Harris to the Northwest corner of Section 19, Township 20 South, Range 26 East, thence run Southerly along the West line of said Section 19, and the West lines of Sections 30 and 31 of Township 20 South, Range 26 East and Section 6, Township 21 South, Range 26 East to the Southwest corner of said Section 6, thence run Easterly along the South line of said Section 6 and the South line of Section 5, Township 21 South, Range 26 East to the intersection with County Road 561, thence run Southerly along the centerline of CR 561 to the North line of Section 17, Township 21 South, Range 26 East, and the intersection with County Road 455, thence run Easterly along the North line of said Section 17, and the North lines of Sections 16, 15, and 14 of Township 21 South, Range 26 East to the West shore of Lake Apopka, thence run Northeasterly along the shoreline of Lake Apopka to the East line of Section 1, Township 21 South, Range 26 East, being the Point of Beginning, and Terminus of this description.

EXHIBIT D

Lake County Commission District No. 4 – Legal Description

BEGIN at a point of the intersection of the eastern shore of Lake Beauclaire with the South line of Section 31, Township 19 South, Range 27 East , said Township line dividing Township 19 South and Township 20 South, also the dividing line between Orange County and Lake County, said point lying 1,465 feet, more or less West of the Southeast corner of said Section 31, thence run Easterly along said dividing Township line to the Wekiva River, located at the Southeast corner of Section 33, Township 19 South, Range 29 East, in the Moses E. Levy Grant, thence run Northerly along the thread of the Wekiva River to the intersection with Blackwater Creek on the East line of Section 37, Township 19 South, Range 29 East, then run Westerly along the thread of Blackwater Creek to the most Western point of Blackwater Creek that intersects the South line of Section 5, Township 19 South, Range 29 North, thence from said point run along the South line of said Section 5 to the Southwest corner of said Section 5, thence run Northerly along the West line of said Section 5 to the Northeast corner of Section 6, Township 19 South, Range 29 East, thence run Westerly along the North line of said Section 6 and along the North line of Sections 1 and 2 of Township 19 South, Range 28 East to the intersection with State Road 44, thence run Northeasterly along the centerline of State Road 44 to the intersection with Cody Lane and County Road 44A, lying on a point on the East line of the West ½ of Section 35, Township 18 South, Range 28 East, thence run Westerly along the centerline of County Road 44A to the Southwest corner of Section 34, Township 18 South, Range 27 East, thence run Northerly along the West line of said Section 34 to the Northeast corner of Section 33, Township 18 South, Range 27 East, thence run Westerly along the North line of said Section 33 and the North line of Sections 32 and 31 of Township 18 South, Range 27 East to the Southeast corner of Section 25, Township 18 South, Range 26 East, thence run Northerly along the East line of said Section 25 to the Northeast corner of the Southeast ¼ of said Section 25, thence run Westerly along the North line of the South ½ of said Section 25 to the Northeast corner of the Southeast ¼ of Section 26, Township 18 South, Range 26 East, thence run Westerly along the North line of the South ½ of said Section 26 to the intersection with the plat of Silver Lake Park as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 16, thence run Northerly and Westerly around the Northern boundary of said plat to the intersection with the North line of the South 1/2 of said Section 26, thence run Westerly along said North line to the intersection with the East boundary of the plat of Donna Vista Park as recorded in Plat Book 9 Page 43 at the Northeast corner of the Northeast ¼ of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 26, thence run Northerly, Westerly and Southerly around the Northern boundary of said plat to the intersection with the North line of the South ½ of said Section 26, thence run Westerly along said North line to the Northwest corner of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 26, thence run Westerly along the North line of the South ½ of Sections 27, 28, and 29 of Township 18 South, Range 26 East to the Northwest corner of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 29, said point also being on County Road #6745 (Apiary Road), thence run Southerly along the West line of said Section 29 and the West line of Section 32, Township 18 South, Range 26 East, also along Apiary Road, to the intersection with County Road 44, thence run Southwesterly and Westerly along the centerline of County Road 44 to the intersection with the thread of the Southwesterly leg of Haynes Creek and the bridge, lying in the Northwest ¼ of the Northwest ¼ of Section 2, Township 19 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southeasterly along the thread of Haynes Creek to the intersection with the west shore of Lake Eustis and the West line of Section 7, Township 19 South, Range 26 East, thence run Southeasterly across the open waters of Lake Eustis to the Northwest corner of the plat of Webb & Riddle as recorded in Plat Book 3 Page 18, lying in Section 15, Township 19 South, Range 26 East, thence run Northeasterly along the Northwest boundary of said plat to the Northwest corner of the plat of Hermosa Shores as recorded in Plat Book 21 Page 49, thence run Southeasterly along the Western Boundary of said plat to the intersection with County Road #5154 (Lakeshore Drive), thence run Northeasterly along the centerline of Lakeshore Drive to the intersection with Clay Blvd, thence run Easterly along the centerline of Clay Blvd to the intersection with centerline of the CSX Railroad, formerly known as the Seaboard Coastline Railroad, said railroad lying parallel to County Road #4756 (David Walker Road) and County Road # 4956 (Mt Homer Road) in Section 15 and Section 22 of Township 19 South, Range 26 East, thence run Southerly along the centerline of the CSX Railroad to the intersection with US Hwy 441, thence run Easterly along the centerline of US Hwy 441 to the intersection with County Road #4858 (Dillard Road), thence run Southerly along the centerline of Dillard Road to the intersection with County Road 19A (Dora Avenue) and the Northwest corner of the Plat of Lake Saunders Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 4 Page 30, thence run Southerly along the West line of said plat to the Southwest corner of said plat, thence run due South to a point on the north shore of Lake Saunders, thence run Northeasterly along the shoreline of Lake Saunders to the West line of Section 23, Township 19 South, Range 26 East, thence run Southerly along the West line of said Section 23 and Section 26, Township 19 South, Range 26 East across the open waters of Lake Saunders to the intersection with County Road #0500A (Old 441), thence run Easterly along the centerline of Old 441 to the intersection with County Road #4260 (Bay Road), thence run Southerly along the centerline of Bay Road to a point on the North line of Section 35, Township 19 South, Range 26 East, also being a point on the East line of the West ½ of the West ½ of said Section 35, thence run Southerly along the East line of the West ½ of the West ½ of said Section 35 to the Northeast corner of the Southwest ¼ of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 35, thence run Southeasterly and Northeasterly along the arc of a curve concave to the North running through the center of the open waters of Lake Dora to a point on the East line of said Section 35, said point lying 300 feet, more or less, North of the Southeast corner of said Section 35, said point also being the point of reverse curvature, said curve concave to the South, thence run through the center of the open waters of Lake Dora Northeasterly and Southeasterly along the arc of said curve to the intersection with the South line of Section 31, Township 19 South, Range 27 East and the East shore of Lake Beauclaire being the POINT OF BEGINNING, and Terminus of this description.

EXHIBIT E

Lake County Commission District No. 5 – Legal Description

BEGIN at a point at the Northeast corner of Section 1, Township 18 South, Range 26 East, said point being on the Township line dividing Townships 17 and 18 South, said line also being the dividing line between Marion County and Lake County, thence run Westerly along said Township line to the center of the Ocklawaha River lying in Section 6, Township 18 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southerly along the thread of the Ocklawaha River to a point lying East of the Easterly extension of the North line of Government Lot 1, thence run Westerly along said extension and along the North line of said Section 6 to the Northwest corner of said Section 6, thence run Westerly along the aforementioned dividing Township line to the Northwest corner of Section 6, Township 18 South, Range 24 East, said Range line dividing Ranges 23 and 24 East, said Range line also being the dividing line between Sumter County and Lake County, thence run South along said Range line to the intersection with State Road 44 and the West line of Section 19, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, thence run Southeasterly along the centerline of State Road 44 to the intersection with County Road #4603 (Whitney Road), lying on the West line of Section 20, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, thence run Northerly and Easterly along Whitney Road following the West and North lines of said Section 20 to the intersection with County Road #5105 (Lewis Road), thence run Northerly and Easterly along the centerline of Lewis Road to the intersection with County Road 468, thence run Northerly along the centerline of CR 468 to the intersection with County Road #5407 (Urick Street), thence run Easterly and Southerly along the centerline of Urick Street to the intersection with County Road #5507 (Dixie Avenue), also known as CR25A, thence run Southeasterly along the centerline of CR 25A to the intersection with US Hwy 27/441, thence run Southeasterly along the centerline of US Hwy 27 /441 to the intersection with County Road #5309 (Indian Trail), thence run Northeasterly and Easterly along the centerline of Indian Trail to the intersection with County Road #5710 (Picciola Road), thence run Northerly along the centerline of Picciola Road to the North line of Section 15, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, thence run Easterly along the North line of said Section 15 and Section 14, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, to the West shore of Lake Griffin, thence run Southerly along the shoreline of Lake Griffin to the North line of Section 23, Township 19 South, Range 24 East, thence run Northeasterly across the open waters of Lake Griffin to the most Southerly point of Block J (now vacated) of the plat of Picciola Island Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 14, Page 19, lying in Section 13,Township 19 South, Range 24 East, thence run Northeasterly across the open waters of Lake Griffin to the most Western point of the plat of Treasure Island as recorded in Plat Book 27 Page 90, lying in Section 6, Township 19 South, Range 25 East, thence run Northeasterly across the open waters of Lake Griffin to the intersection with the East shore of Lake Griffin and the entrance to Haynes Creek, lying in the Southeast ¼ of Section 29,Township 18 South, Range 25 East, thence run Southeasterly along the thread of Haynes Creek to the intersection of the most Southwesterly leg of Haynes Creek with the bridge at County Road 44 in the Northwest ¼ of the Northwest ¼ of Section 2, Township 19 South, Range 25 East, thence run Easterly and Northeasterly along the centerline of CR 44 to a point on the West line Section 32, Township 18 South, Range 26 East, also being a point on County Road #6745 (Apiary Road), thence run Northerly along the West line of said Section 32 and Section 29, Township 18 South, Range 26 East to the West ¼ corner of said Section 29, thence run Easterly along the Mid Section line of said Section 29 and Sections 28, 27 and 26 of Township 18 South, Range 26 East to the intersection with the West boundary of the plat of Donna Vista Park as recorded in Plat Book 9 Page 43, thence run Northerly, Easterly, and Southerly along the Northern boundary of said plat to the Northeast corner of the Northeast ¼ of the Southwest ¼ of said Section 26, thence run Easterly along the Mid Section line of said Section 26 to the West boundary of the plat of Silver Lake Park as recorded in Plat Book 6 Page 16, thence run Easterly along the North boundary of said plat to the Mid Section line of said Section 26, thence run Easterly along said Mid Section line to the West ¼ corner of Section 25, Township 18 South, Range 26 East, thence run Easterly along the Mid Section line of said Section 25 to the East ¼ corner of said Section 25, thence run Southerly along the East line of said Section 25 to the Northwest corner of Section 31, Township 18 South, Range 27 East, thence run Easterly along the North line of said Section 31 and the North line of Sections 32 and 33 of Township 18 South, Range 27 East to the Northeast corner of said Section 33, thence run Southerly along the East line of said Section 33 to the Southeast corner of said Section 33 and the intersection with County Road 44A, thence run Easterly along the centerline of CR 44A to the intersection with Cody Lane and State Road 44, lying on the East line of the West ½ of Section 35, Township 18 South, Range 28 East, thence run Southwesterly along the centerline of State Road 44 to the intersection with the North line of Section 2, Township 19 South, Range 28 East, thence run Easterly along the North line of said Section 2 and the North line of Section 1, Township 19 South, Range 28 East and the North line of Section 6, Township 19 South, Range 29 East to the Northeast corner of said Section 6, thence run Southerly along the East line of said Section 6 to the Southwest corner of Section 5, Township 19 South, Range 29 East, thence run Easterly along the South line of said Section 5, to the intersection with Black Water Creek, thence run Easterly along the thread of Black Water Creek to the Wekiva River, thence run Northerly along the thread of the Wekiva River to the St. Johns River, near the Northerly line of the Moses E. Levy Grant, lying in Section 37, Range 18 South, Range 29 East, thence run in a Northerly and Westerly direction along the thread of the St. Johns River to intersect with Lake George, lying in Section 39, Township 15 South, Range 27 East, thence run Westerly to the Southwest shore of Lake George, thence run Westerly and Northerly along the shoreline of Lake George to the West line of Section 18,Township 14 South, Range 27 East, said Range line dividing Ranges 26 and 27 East, thence run Southerly along said Range line to a point on the South line of Government Lot 3 in Section 5, Township 17 South, Range 27 East, said line also being on the North line of the plat of Forest Campsites as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 23,  thence run Westerly along the North line of said plat and along the North line of Section 6, Township 17 South, Range 27 East to a point on the Northwest corner of said Section 6, said point also being located on the dividing line between Ranges 27 and 26 East, thence run Southerly along said Range line to the Northeast corner of Section 1, Township 18 South, Range 26 East, being the Point of Beginning, and the Terminus of this description.

recess and reassembly

The Chairman announced at 10:00 a.m. that there would be a 15-minute recess.

COUNTY MANAGER’S DEPARTMENTAL BUSINESS

county manager

local vendor preference

Mr. Gray recapped that the Board had asked to have a discussion on the local vendor preference, and they were doing more with local businesses to make sure that they have every opportunity to bid on any of the County’s term and supply contracts.  He related that they would outline and give the Board some information about the local business preference policy, as well as information learned from when he had surveyed other counties in the area.

Mr. David Heath, Deputy County Manager, explained that local vendor preference was a process which gave a preference by geography, which would be by county in this case, and he went over the mission of the procurement function, mentioning that the goal is to ensure that the County receives goods and services in a timely and cost-effective manner.  He noted that the performance indicators show that the number of term and supply contracts have stayed constant or increased slightly since FY 2007, while the purchase orders and formal solicitations have decreased during that time.  He reported that the Board procures through the purchasing department about $117 million a year, with the largest percentages going to 16 percent for construction projects, 24 percent for professional services such as engineers and IT services, and 38 percent for both larger and smaller wholesale items such as office supplies, fire trucks, or computers.  He gave the value of those purchase orders by location, which were 21 percent to local vendors, 31 percent to Central Florida vendors, 34 percent to those that are in-state, and 14 percent to vendors who were located out of state; as well as the value of the $36 million worth of purchase orders for Central Florida, which he described as trading partners, including 40 percent or $14.3 million to Orange, who was the largest partner; 35 percent or $12.5 million to Sumter County, which includes power and garbage services; and 20 percent or $7.2 million to Seminole County.

Mr. Sandy Minkoff, County Attorney, went over the legal parameters and commented that the legal analysis was very simple, since there was no reason why the County could not have local preferences from a legal perspective, especially since state statutes include a preference for Florida companies when the state is awarding business over out-of-state companies.  However, the only caveats are policies that would conflict with Florida Statute or federal statute or funding sources which would preclude application of that type of policy, such as a lot of the gas tax money or CDBG projects, which requires bidding to the lowest bidder.

Mr. Heath explained what the County could consider under the Consultant’s Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA) under Section 287.055 Florida Statute when evaluating the award of a contract, which includes location as well as factors such as ability, minority status, time and budget constraints, and past performance, and he discussed what they currently do under their existing policies and procedures.  He pointed out that the current board policy relating to purchasing does not address economic development or job growth and considers only factors of quality, cost, and availability.

Commr. Cadwell opined that they would have to fix the County policy.

Mr. Heath commented that the County Manager Procedure contains innovative factors such as business friendly practices, use of geographic limitations based on operational need, and consideration of vendor location in regards to service support, which he believed was put in there to address situations when there needs to be an immediate turn-around time, such as when a septic tank overflows.  He noted that a policy was also recently enacted of re-competition rather than renewal of term and supply contracts when beneficial for the County.  He then related that 34 of the 67 counties in Florida had some sort of a local preference, and he showed on a map the surrounding counties which have adopted local preference ordinances, which were Marion, Sumter, Polk, and Osceola, noting that Volusia County has a decision regarding a regional preference pending.   He specified that Osceola County provides for award to a local vendor who has a bona-fide operational business location within the county for at least one year prior to bid opening or at least 30 percent of employees who reside within the county if they are within 2 to 5 percent of a lowest priced non-local vendor, depending on the bid price.  He described Polk County’s policy as similar to Osceola County, with the difference being in the definition of a local business and an ability to match the price offered by a lowest-priced non-local vendor when it is within .5 to 5 percent of that price.  He related that Sumter County provides award to a local vendor that is within 2 percent up to a maximum of $2,000 of the lowest-priced non-local vendor.

Commr. Campione noted that Sumter County’s definition of local business is more restrictive, since an individual or partners of a business would need to be residents of the county or a business would have to have the principal place of business within the county.

Commr. Cadwell expressed concern about companies who list some of their local companies as subcontractors but do not end up giving them any of the business after they earn the bid, and he stated that they need to find a way to stop that practice.

Mr. Heath continued to explain that if the in-county bid in Marion County is within five percent of the low bid, the local company goes into a bidding process with the lowest out-of-county bidder, but Marion County is currently in the process of amending their code to go to ten percent.  He mentioned that Volusia County does not currently have a local preference, but they are looking next week at doing a local preference of three percent with a regional approach similar to what Seminole County has, which is based on myregion philosophy of thinking that they would be stronger cooperating as a region as opposed to competing against each other.  He pointed out that although Orange County claims to not have a local vendor preference, they have a provision for a reciprocal agreement that would use the lowest bidder’s county’s preference if that bidder is from out of Orange County.  He showed a chart in the Powerpoint presentation which gave a summary of the type of preferences each county has and the amount of money in contracts that they receive from Lake County.

Mr. Heath explained that if the Board chooses to go with some sort of local preference, they need to choose the geographic area, the type of local preference, and the definition of a local business.  He elaborated that the geographic area could be for Lake County only, a region that would include the Central Florida area, or a Metro Orlando EDC region, which would include Orange, Seminole, Lake, and Osceola Counties as well as the City of Orlando.  He described the types of local preference that they could have including a preference or subsidy, where they would pay additional dollars to support the award to a local vendor; a match, which would offer a local vendor the opportunity to match the lowest out-of-county vendor; a best and final policy which entails that the best out-of-county and the best local vendor compete with each other with an additional bid; and the reciprocal which would use the preference from the external vendor’s county as described above regarding Orange County’s policy.  He commented that the definition of a local business would be a real issue, which could be defined any number of ways, such as location of the corporate headquarters, residency of the business workforce or owners, the quantity of economic contribution to the County, or whether a firm is licensed to do business in and has a physical address within the County.  He added that there were going to be some challenges and issues in instituting this type of policy, including cost, impact on competition, and impact of local vendors who bid in other counties.

Commr. Cadwell commented that the presentation brought up every question that the Board needs to think about when making this decision and deciding what policy to implement.

Commr. Campione suggested that they do a work session on this issue and invite the public, as well as vendors and contractors so that they could learn some information from them that could be helpful in determining their concerns and the effect this kind of policy would have.

Commr. Conner commented that he had heard that Leesburg and Clermont have good preference policies, and he suggested that they get some input from the business community at some point in this process.

Mr. Gray pointed out that one of the suggestions they were going to make at the end of this presentation was to hold a public hearing and a workshop on this issue.

Commr. Cadwell recommended that the Board be supplied with ordinances from other areas to look at about a week or two before that workshop is held.

Commr. Parks commented that he believed they should give local businesses every opportunity to demonstrate that they could handle the work compared to someone else from out of the area, and he opined that the right people were now on the committee that would review the bids and make those types of decisions.

Commr. Cadwell commented that if they adopted a policy similar to Orange County, their local vendors would not get a break against any Orange County company; however, they would not be penalized if they made a bid in Orange County.

Mr. Heath clarified that he believed that the Board felt that the next step would be a workshop, public forum, or a survey with businesses that are on their vendor list who have bid on work in the last few years and then having a public hearing in front of the Board.

addendum 1-IIA

on-site location for south lake health clinic

Commr. Conner declared a conflict of interest on this issue, because he has had a business relationship with the contractor who might be involved in this, although he had taken steps to dissolve that relationship.

Mr. Gray recapped that Ms. Donna Gregory from the Health Department made a presentation on the Low Income Pool (LIP) grant she received from the state’s Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) for the health clinic in the south part of the county in order to expand the primary care infrastructure for health services.  He emphasized that they were in a tight timeframe for this, and he explained that the purpose of the presentation is to approve the site selected and the acquisition process.  He pointed out a list of the clinics in the county that was in the backup from Ms. Gregory’s previous presentation and noted that there was currently no site in the south for the mandated clinical services such as vaccines for children, STD testing and treatment, rabies, and family planning. He commented that they have also identified dental care as a major need in the south and indicated that there are transportation concerns because those residents currently have to be transported up to the north part of the county for those mandated services.  He indicated that the grant they were awarded in the amount of $689,000 for a 5,000-plus square foot building to be used in the south part of the county has to be spent by the end of this calendar year, but the money they have received as well from the state in the amount of $686,000 to be used for purchasing, alterations, furniture, equipment, and operating costs does not have to be spent until next June.  He mentioned that even though the Health Department will be running and operating the facility, the County would be maintaining the building.  He recapped that after the Board directed the County Attorney’s Office on September 6 to search for possible sites in that part of the County, Mr. Minkoff’s office sent out to about 47 realtors the Health Department’s criteria which included the size of at least 5,000 square feet, the location, access of the facility, adequate parking, and age and condition of the building.  He reported that they received multiple offers of sites, which were narrowed down to 4 properties, and he briefly went over the sites in Clermont that were considered, which were a furniture store on Hwy 27 and Hartwood Marsh Road, Unit 9 in the Lost Lake Professional Village on Citrus Tower Boulevard located south of the Walmart store, the former Cooper Library building located on West Minneola Avenue, and the South Lake Medical Arts Center, which was adjacent to the hospital and located on Oakley Seaver.  He noted that they had selected Building N in the South Lake Medical Arts Center site because of several factors, including the proximity to the hospital, the location on the transportation corridor of Highway 50, the existence of a parking garage, the existence of all infrastructure needs including stormwater, and that it meets all Health Department needs.

Dr. Claude Jones from the Health Department recapped that the mandatory services Mr. Gray mentioned were very needed in the South Lake County area, and he gave some of the positive aspects for the particular clinic that was chosen, such as the close proximity to the hospital, which could provide services such as skilled nursing facilities, imaging services, rehab centers, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and home health.  He related that another reason they chose this area is the proximity to medical specialties within the commerce park such as a dermatologist, cardiologist, GI specialist, and an imaging center, which would help them in their mission to provide services to that community.  He commented that the Health Department believed in collaboration and building partnerships, so they wanted to partner with the hospital for long-term goals to provide services such as ER diversion, decrease of readmissions, and forming a disease management program which includes case management after the mandated services were in place.  He concluded that he supports the recommendations of the staff.

Mr. Gray pointed out that Dr. Jones was instrumental in looking at all of the sites and came to the conclusion that this was the site that he preferred for the Health Department.

Mr. Minkoff stated that ordinarily if they were acquiring a vacant parcel of land as in this case, they would go through a process to solicit people to submit sites they would consider, and once they chose a site they would move forward with a full appraisal to use during the negotiation process.  He explained that because of the time constraints, however, the time frame would not allow them to do that, but part of the deal would be that the owner would construct a shell of a building for them before the end of the year on that site.  He related that the acquisition would be a small piece of property just under 7,000 square feet, which would still be adequate to house the 5,000 square-foot building, and he noted that all of the parking, stormwater, and open spaces would not be on the parcel, but offsite in the development.  He stated that he contemplated a contract to purchase from the owner a land condominium with a building shell on it that would be built to the County’s specifications before the end of the year for $689,000, and if the Board approved this recommendation, he would be bringing back with the contract a good estimate for the construction of the shell by an estimating firm and an estimate of some land values from an on-call review appraiser before they make the final decision to approve the contract.  He added that the contemplated contract would also provide the option to the County to get the building built out, and the total cost was expected to be less than $1 million, which was about a $200 per square foot cost for building, land, and all of the amenities.  He mentioned that he believed they would reserve the right to complete the building either by bidding it or using one of their on-call contractors.  It was pointed out that renovation costs were something that would need to be considered if they were to decide on some of the other sites.

Commr. Campione asked what the condominium fees would be and commented that they would need to look at that and factor that in.

Mr. Minkoff responded that it looked like those fees consisted of just normal-type expenses such as garage, stormwater, parking lot, and general landscaping maintenance, but they have not really gone into tremendous detail in terms of the cost; however, he would bring that back to the Board with the contract.  He noted that the Health Department would probably pay those operating costs.

Commr. Parks stated that it would be important to him to be provided with a regular update on the relationship that they were building with the hospital as well as metrics and a gauge of success to make sure they were keeping patients out of the emergency room by going to this center and to ensure that the money they spend on this important issue is well spent.

Mr. Gray responded that he could work with the Health Department to make sure they include that in their regular reports that they make to the Board.

Commr. Campione asked whether they were going to have a backup plan in case they do not get it built in time so that they do not lose the grant money.

Mr. Minkoff responded that they have already engaged an architect and seem confident that they could meet the deadline.

Mr. Gray added that this site was already permitted by the City of Clermont.

On a motion by Commr. Parks, seconded by Commr. Cadwell and carried unanimously by those voting by a vote of 4-0, the Board approved the staff recommendation to move forward with the acquisition of the South Lake Medical Arts Center at Oakley Seaver in Clermont, with staff to bring back a final contract on October 18.

Commr. Conner abstained from the vote.

recess and reassembly

The Chairman announced at 11:40 a.m. that there would be a fifteen-minute break.

public works

annual stormwater presentation

Mr. Jim Stivender, Public Works Director, explained that forty years ago stormwater projects started in Lake County on a county level, but it did not have its own funding source until the last ten years since they have been using the MSTU for the unincorporated areas.

Ms. Mary Hamilton, Stormwater Project Manager, stated that this presentation would highlight some of the projects over the past year, as well as discuss what they would be doing this year and some of their challenges. She specified that she would go through their regulatory requirements, go through some of their inspection services, and finish with some capital projects.  She gave some history about the Floodplain Program and noted that they were currently operating off of the FIRM (Flood Insurance Rate Map) Panel from July 2002.  She related that they were going through their map update process that happens about every ten years and should have the new maps by fall of next year; also, they had the initial staff review earlier this year and a well-attended public meeting in August where FEMA was there with their contractors, and local jurisdictions talked to the residents about how they would be affected.   She mentioned that there was an article in last Sunday’s newspaper about the progress of the program, and she reported that they have to update their floodplain ordinance between now and 2012 to reflect the changes and expect to bring that back to the Board in spring of 2012.  She noted that flood insurance premiums have continued to rise and have gone up approximately 10 percent in the past three years, with rates between $4,800 and $5,100 annually, and are expected to increase 20 percent next year. She commented that they have had a huge amount of people since the initiation of the 2012 map change to check whether they qualify for a Letter Of Map Change (LOMC) by bringing in an elevation certificate from a surveyor which would reduce their insurance rates significantly.  She went over the benefits of having flood insurance in Lake County, including a 15 percent discount for currently having a Class 7 rating from the Community Rating System (CRS) program.  She stated that the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program (NPDES) was a permit that the County holds, and they were in their second five-year period, had an annual report due in November, and were due for an audit from DEP next year.  She also pointed out that the Total Maximum Daily Load Program (TMDL) has been driving a lot of their capital improvement projects in local ponds, which was put into place to comply with the Clean Water Act (CWA) which requires states to submit lists of surface waters that are used primarily for fishing and swimming that do not meet water quality standards.  She reported that the Numeric Nutrient Criteria (NNC) was part of a settlement agreement between EPA and Earth Justice, who filed a lawsuit against the state for not doing enough to take care of their water quality issues, and she reported that the criteria is to go into effect March 2012, which could result in a TMDL classification revision for the County.  She explained that the Department of Public Works had an illicit discharge ordinance under their MPDS and a lot grading ordinance that came to fruition and that they now have a much more streamlined process to take care of those drainage and flooding needs.  One of their other projects she mentioned under the Flood Study is Blue Lake, which is a landlocked lake in Eustis that was completely built out, and they were coordinating meetings with the City of Eustis.  She added that they were monitoring that lake for well over a year now, and it continues to be over the FEMA-established 100-year flood elevation and would be sending out letters to the affected property owners and sending to FEMA for adoption.

Ms. Hamilton related that the stormwater department recently acquired the lab and highlighted some of the things the lab is responsible for.  She commented that the lab was NELAP certified, and the data that they submit is recognized and highly-regarded by DEP as well as some of the federal agencies.  She explained that the lab is used for surface water and springs monitoring, which helps their TMDL program, as well as for the landfill sampling, assisting the Water Authority with phosphorous sampling, and water sampling for citizens.  She then discussed the stormwater funding, stating that the MSTU was established in 1999, with collection starting in 2000, and noted that stormwater salaries were added in 2002.  She recapped that the funding was split three ways between stormwater, parks and roads in 2007 and that they were receiving about $500,000 for stormwater, with the balance going to parks this year.  She showed a graph illustrating that this year they will have their new revenue as well as their carry-forward revenue expended.  She pointed out that there were five projects since 2002 from the stormwater grant funding, including the Eustis downtown stormwater pond and the Hooks Street drainage improvements, and mentioned the partners for those projects, commenting that they have been able to leverage much more by working cooperatively.  She also went over their Capital Improvement Program (CIP) which included projects such as the Dead River, Getford Road, and Hollendale Stormwater Ponds, and pointed out that the CIP projects removed over 255 pounds of total phosphorous per year.   She then showed slides which illustrated both a non-maintained and a maintained pond to demonstrate how they could quickly become overgrown and commented that some of the stormwater ponds require a high level of maintenance which costs about $30,000 annually.ained from the vote.ospital and source , explained that four years ago stormwater started in Lake County on a county level, and

Mr. Stivender reported that they have completed 8 of the 252 basins, and he specified that the Washington Avenue Phase II Improvements at a cost of $1.2 million and the Royal Trails Improvements at a cost of $4 million have been projects that have existed for a while but that they are just now getting around to addressing because of funding and other issues.  He elaborated that they have a healthy reserve of $8 million for these large stormwater projects, and he pointed out that they have been able to save money by partnering with other entities and getting a discounted price on the dirt due to the economy.  He specified that their operating costs are between $500,000 and $600,000 a year, but they need to consider what they wanted to do in the future and how much funding the Board wanted to put into the program in the future.  He also projected that they would be out of program dollars in 2012-13.

Mr. Gray added that their plan was to do these agreements to bring to the Board in December when they start the budget process earlier and to look at the future funding of stormwater.  He noted that the MSTU was heavily parks funded in order to operate and maintain the park system in the County, since there was very little money coming out of the general fund for parks.  He related that he believed that they should complete the stormwater plan they have in place since they have a healthy reserve in the MSTU, with the Board making some funding decisions in the future when that funding runs out, and he assured the Board that he would be looking five years out.

Commr. Hill asked why a high percentage of the funding went towards parks.

Mr. Stivender commented that was not their recommendation, but they did look at the reserve they had of $8 million in 2005-06, and he explained that they would have a more sustainable match between their staff and consultants in bidding projects if they increased the percentage for stormwater.

Mr. Gray noted they have to find a way to operate and maintain all of their existing parks.

Mr. Stivender pointed out that they have several months to work through that issue, and this presentation was not meant to address that, but they could make a recommendation of an amount in the future.

Commr. Parks mentioned that the Capital Facilities Advisory Committee addressed this issue last Thursday, September 29, and would make a recommendation to the Board in November for the configuration of that MSTU.

Mr. Stivender responded that that committee actually chose not to include the unincorporated MSTU in their recommendation and took it off the list for roads.

Commr. Cadwell pointed out that it was a conscious decision by the Board at that time to use the funds the way they did, and they needed to have a discussion about what percentage of stormwater, parks, and roads would come out of the general fund or the MSTU in the future.

Commr. Hill asked if there was a way to notify residents about flood insurance and the program the County has regarding that.

Ms. Hamilton responded that they have information about that on their web site, and they have been sending out press releases through this process.  She reminded the Board that even if people go through the Letter of Map Change process, although most were successful, the rate was still up to the lender, and they have tried to educate people as much as possible to try to help them.

other business

ratification of women’s hall of fame inductees

On a motion by Commr. Cadwell, seconded by Commr. Parks and carried unanimously by a vote of 5-0, the Board approved the ratification of Ms. Betty Brennand and Ms. Evelyn Smith as the 2011 Women’s Hall of Fame inductees as selected by the Women’s Hall of Fame Committee.

REPORTS – COUNTY MANAGER

online permitting process

Mr. Gray related that he and staff members were going to present the County’s online permitting module to groups of local contractors and builders at a breakfast and lunch next Wednesday, October 12, and he commented that the Home Builders Association was very excited about the online permitting process and was very complimentary about the Board moving forward with that.

REPORTS – COMMISSIONER HILL – CHAIRMAN AND DISTRICT 1

workforce central florida appointees

Commr. Hill related that she would have to make three appointments at a meeting tomorrow morning, October 5, at 9:00 a.m. regarding Workforce Central Florida, and she wanted one appointee from each economic development sector or micro-region.  She asked the Commissioners to let her know today if they had someone they believed would be a good appointee for this committee.

Mr. Minkoff elaborated that the appointees need to be high-ranking individuals in the private business sector, such as a chief official of a company.

Commr. Hill added that the current bylaws also indicate that it could not be a retiree from the business world and could not be anyone that was on the previous Workforce board.

REPORTS – COMMISSIONER campione – vice chairman and DISTRICT 4

town meeting in sorrento regarding sex offender village

Commr. Campione mentioned that there was a town meeting on Thursday, October 6, at 6:00 p.m. at Sorrento Elementary School to give an update to the community regarding the sex offender village situation.  She related that they were working on an ordinance that would give greater protection throughout Lake County from sexual predators, and she asked the County Attorney to address specifically how to prohibit sex offenders from being at public or private parks unless they had a family member present at that park, which although she realized would be difficult to enforce, would at least give law enforcement officials a tool to work with to address that.  She related that the ordinance that addresses the distances and the number that could live in a particular household would come to them on October 18, but this could be brought up in a separate second ordinance.

Mr. Minkoff stated that he would bring that back for approval to advertise.

reports – commissioner cadwell – district 5

polk county sports commission

Commr. Cadwell related that he traveled to Polk County with Mr. Scott Blankenship, Director of Economic Development and Tourism, to meet with the Central Florida Sports Commission, which was a county-operated independent organization with in-house Polk County staff.  He noted that the Lake Myrtle Sports Complex, which had more soccer, softball, and baseball fields than North Lake Park, was purely a tourist destination and not used by any local teams except for special tournaments brought there by the county, and they actually bonded for that facility using only the heads and beds tax money.  He commented that although Lake County could not do that right now, it was a good business plan and is another model out there for them to look at when they have enough infrastructure to sell.  He mentioned that Polk County has also donated money to the City of Lakeland for the Lakeland Civic Center and two other sports complexes.

babe ruth t-ball at north lake park

Commr. Cadwell stated that the Babe Ruth T-ball kicked off last night at North Lake Park, and adult softball, youth soccer, and Pop Warner football were also practicing at that time.  He pointed out that there were about 1,000 people in attendance.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to be brought to the attention of the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 1:00 p.m.

 

____________________________

jenNifer hill, chairman

ATTEST:

 

 

________________________________

NEIL KELLY, CLERK