A regular MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
September 14, 2021
The Lake County Board of County Commissioners met in regular session on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 9:00 a.m., in the County Commission Chambers, Lake County Administration Building, Tavares, Florida. Commissioners present at the meeting were: Sean Parks, Chairman; Kirby Smith, Vice Chairman; Douglas B. Shields; Leslie Campione; and Josh Blake. Others present were: Jennifer Barker, Interim County Manager; Melanie Marsh, County Attorney; Niki Booth, Executive Office Manager, County Manager’s Office; Gary J. Cooney, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller; Kristy Mullane, Chief Financial Officer; and Stephanie Cash, Deputy Clerk.
INVOCATION and pledge
Commr. Parks welcomed everyone to the Board of County
Commissioners (BCC) meeting and stated that the Pledge of Allegiance would be
led by Ms. Marissabelle Tighe, who joined the County in 2019 and was currently
the Director for the County’s Office of Veteran Services. He said that
Ms. Tighe served in the United States (U.S.) Navy from 2010 to 2014 as an
aviation structural mechanic for the Navy’s only forward deployed Mh-60S
helicopter expeditionary squadrons in Guam and Japan. He mentioned that during
detachments, Ms. Tighe maintained and inspected aircrafts to provide combat
logistics, search and rescue, medical evacuation, and humanitarian assistance
for the U.S. Seventh Fleet. He commented
that Ms. Tighe’s awards included the Meritorious Unit Command, the Good Conduct
Medal, the War on Terrorism Service medal, and the National Defense Service
Medal. He then
thanked Ms. Tighe for her service to this country and to Lake County.
Chaplain Rick Spence with Lake
County Fire Rescue then gave the invocation and Ms. Tighe led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
virtual meeting instructions
Mr. Erikk Ross, Director for the Information Technology (IT) Department, explained that this meeting was being livestreamed on the County website and was also being made available through Zoom Webinar for members of the public who wished to provide comments during the Citizen Question and Comment Period later in the agenda. He elaborated that anyone watching though the livestream who wished to participate could follow the directions currently being broadcast through the stream; furthermore, he relayed that during the Citizen Question and Comment Period, anyone who had joined the webinar via their phone could press *9 to virtually raise their hand, and anyone participating online could click the raise hand button to identify that they wished to speak. He said that when it was time for public comment, he would read the person’s name or phone number, unmute the appropriate line, and the speaker would be asked to provide comments. He added that everyone would have three minutes to speak, and after three minutes an alarm would sound to let them know that their time was up. He added that they previously notified the public that comments could be emailed through 5:00 p.m. on the previous day, and those comments were shared with the Board prior to the meeting. He stated that anyone wishing to provide written comments during the meeting could visit www.lakecountyfl.gov/commissionmeeting, noting that comments sent during this meeting would be shared with the Commission after the meeting was concluded.
Agenda update
Ms. Jennifer Barker, Interim County Manager, mentioned that Commissioner Campione was attending the BCC meeting virtually, and that she would be participating in conversations throughout the meeting, noting that she would not be voting. She commented that there was a revised asset disposal list added to Tab 8, a proposed agreement added to Tab 39, and that Tab 48 was added as an addendum since first publishing, noting that the previous Tab 48 was currently Tab 49. She commented that the proposed budget book was added to Tab 49 for the hearing at 5:05 p.m.
American Rescue Plan act Update
Mr. Sean Beaudet, Grants Coordinator for the Office of Management and Budget, presented an update on the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). He recalled that on August 24, 2021 the Board approved the allocations to seven categories and requested items to be added to the list. He noted that the revenue loss calculation through December 31, 2020, which was originally estimated at $10 million, totaled $12.4 million in lost revenue; however, that category had less restrictions on spending, which would open it up to more projects. He stated that the revenue loss portion would be calculated annually and could increase depending on economic recovery over the next three years. He said that the Lake County Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller remote desktop software was added to the list, and that the Lake Technical College (Lake Tech) Transportation Training and Innovation Center, Ferndale Preserve, and the Medical Examiner’s Office renovation share of cost were added as revenue replacement items. He mentioned that because of the allocation update to the lost revenue portion, the County had to pull $2.4 million from the infrastructure section. He displayed the allocation updates that were approved on August 24, 2021, the revisions with the items that were added, and the proposed amounts, showing the changes and the updated project list. He then requested to approve the revised allocations to the categories listed; additionally, he showed the new funding requests from the Lake County Sheriff’s Office, the City of Minneola, and the Town of Montverde, inviting the Board to discuss them.
Ms. Barker clarified that there was $9.5 million allocated for water and sewer projects, and that the City of Minneola’s proposed infrastructure projects and the Town of Montverde’s projects would fit into that allocated amount. She stated that if the Board chose to approve those projects, they were already covered in the plan, and the County would move forward with the Cities.
Commr. Parks commented that this was a standing BCC agenda item, and that items could move around.
Commr. Smith inquired how an athletic complex fit into the scope of ARPA.
Mr. Beaudet replied that it was in the revenue replacement category, and that it was a request they had received.
Ms. Barker mentioned that it had not been added into the plan yet, and that if the Board wanted to pursue any of these projects, staff would need to be advised on the current day, adding that they would be added to the list that would be brought before the Board at the September 28, 2021 BCC meeting. She commented that the Minneola Athletic Complex did not fit with ARPA spending categories, but that the County could use the lost revenue replacement to pay for it if it was approved.
Commr. Smith asked if any other municipality besides the City of Minneola or the Town of Montverde had come forward.
Ms. Barker said that the County had not received communication from any other City for water or sewer.
Commr. Parks mentioned that the County had an agreement with the City of Minneola for the improvement of the Minneola Athletic Complex, which received a significant amount of use. He inquired if that $4 million would be in addition to what the County was already doing, and Ms. Barker confirmed that this was correct. Commissioner Parks remarked that even though the City of Minneola was asking for more funding, the County did not have to do that, and that he would rather keep the water projects in place than improve the Minneola Athletic Complex. He noted that the County was already contributing to that, and he wondered what that extra revenue would be for.
Mr. Beaudet commented that it was for completing the installation of planned upgrades to basketball and tennis courts, tee-ball field, dog park, restrooms, playground, pavilions, additional walkways, lighting, and parking area improvements.
Ms. Barker remarked that the County had been using Infrastructure Sales Tax, and that it was a pay-as-you-go type structure.
Commr. Blake asked if the County knew how much ARPA funding the City of Minneola received directly, and Ms. Barker stated that she did not know, but that she could find out and send it to him.
Commr. Blake reminded the Board that the Cities had their own ARPA funding.
Commr. Parks opined that the water projects could be of benefit for the City and the County, and that the extension of sewer out to an unincorporated area could affect some bodies of water.
Commr. Smith commented that he agreed with the infrastructure items.
Commr. Parks reiterated that there was interest in the infrastructure items but not the Minneola Athletic Complex.
Commr. Shields asked if there was a list of the septic tank areas that were a problem in the County.
Commr. Parks opined that there was not, but that there was a way to prioritize that.
Commr. Campione mentioned that the City of Mount Dora had submitted a request for water and sewer extension costs in association with the Wolf Branch Innovation District area and the Mt. Plymouth-Sorrento Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) on State Road (SR) 46, noting that it was not listed with the other projects.
Commr. Parks commented that he knew about the request, adding that the County was already contributing $15 million to a trail and utility extensions for the City of Mount Dora. He opined that if the City of Mount Dora was going to develop a new area, the City should fund that, adding that the other Cities had existing residents in unincorporated areas that needed to get off of septic systems for water resource protection.
Commr. Campione pointed out that the area the request was for was the County’s CRA, and that there were residents on wells and septic tanks that could transition onto water and sewer systems in the Wekiva Protection Area.
Commr. Parks commented that the Board needed to know which areas were the highest priorities to get off of septic systems and onto sewer systems.
Commr. Campione stated that there was a list provided to the Board during a presentation a couple of months prior concerning the wastewater distribution system proposal, and that there was a map that showed some of the critical areas adjacent to water bodies and springs, adding that the Board could look at that.
Commr. Parks said that the Minneola Athletic Complex could come off of the list, and that the Board would continue with their interest in the infrastructure and public health items, adding that it could change every two weeks.
Ms. Barker mentioned that at the September 28, 2021 BCC meeting, the County could bring back the map indicated by Commissioner Campione, and that the Board could discuss the highest priority areas for removing the septic systems and transitioning over to sewer systems. She commented that the public health item for the Lake County Sheriff’s Office containing the body scanner and the visitation and registration center would qualify for ARPA funds, but that the dispatch system might not qualify. She asked if the Board would like to proceed with the two items that would qualify and place the dispatch system on a new request list, adding that the County could bring it back on the September 28, 2021 BCC meeting after doing more research; furthermore she pointed out that there was $7.25 million for the Southeast Regional Technical Advisory Committee.
Commr. Parks asked if there was a nontraditional water source project primarily for the City of Clermont in the Wellness Way area.
Mr. Beaudet said that it was region wide, and that there were quite a few Cities involved, such as the Cities of Clermont, Groveland, Mascotte, and Minneola, adding that Utilities, Inc. was also included.
Commr. Parks mentioned that it had been a part of the South Lake Regional Water Initiative, which included all those Cities and the County at that time, and that there were calculations done to estimate how much water could be allocated to growth. He said that there was a difference of six to seven million gallons a day for south Lake County, and that the water supply could not come from the Upper Floridan Aquifer because it affected the drinking water, lakes, rivers, and wetlands. He commented that this was a project that would go to the Lower Floridan Aquifer to use as a potential water resource for irrigation and to supplement reuse systems, and that it was a method to achieve a balance between growth and what could be taken out of the aquifer without negative effects. He opined that there were other ways to make that up through conservation, and that conservation had come a long way in the previous couple of years. He said that he would rather it be a placeholder for septic to sewer conversion in that area.
Commr. Smith commented that he would like more information on the deep water well system, and that, if it was replacing wastewater, the County would need to find out if the Cities were depleted on their reuse water.
Commr. Parks commented that the South Lake Regional Water Initiative was operating for a few years, and that the Cities eventually left and did their own programs. He mentioned that he had not been updated on this issue, and that he was only recently made aware of this request, adding that he would like more information.
Mr. Beaudet commented that the County could ask the South Lake Regional Water Initiative to come do a presentation, and Commissioner Parks opined that the County should do that.
Commr. Campione remarked that she would rather use the funds to develop alternatives to wells and septic systems instead of expanding residential growth as a result of opening up more avenues for water resources and potable water. She said that she did not know if this item was an issue of conservation and improvement of those systems, opining that it could be for the purpose of enabling additional development.
Commr. Parks opined that they were aiming at how to meet the difference, and that it could be done with conservation.
Commr. Campione opined that technology and conservation had come a long way, and that it could be enough to make up the difference.
Ms. Barker commented that the County could gather more information and provide it to the Board by email, and that the Southeast Regional Technical Advisory Committee could be invited to come give a presentation, adding that the County would take it off the list while they gathered more information.
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Shields and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved the proposed funding requests with Board modifications.
Minutes approval
On a motion by Commr. Blake, seconded by Commr. Smith and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved the minutes for the BCC meetings of May 25, 2021 (Regular Meeting) and May 26, 2021 (Special Meeting) as presented.
COMMISSIONER’S BOARDS AND COMMITTEES UPDATE
Commr. Shields reported that the Elder Affairs Coordinating Council meeting had been canceled.
Commr. Smith reported that he had an update from the Library Advisory Board, noting that the library system had been working with the school system for a couple of years on providing students with student virtual library cards. He said that this would give every student in Lake County Schools access to digital components of the library system along with access to all the computer systems within the 16 member libraries throughout Lake County, and that it totaled 43,530 new student cards. He commented that Tutor.com was a premier service which offered 365 days of live tutoring for over 200 academic subjects, and that it was a live tutor system from 3:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. He mentioned that TumbleMath provided over 1,000 math-related storybooks, and that TumbleBooks provided over 1,000 eBooks for Kindergarten through sixth grade, adding that they provided a learning tool for younger students in a fun way. He commented that through the work of the Lake County Library System and the relationships they had with other libraries, the Tampa Bay Library Association had donated the TumbleMath and TumbleBook for a savings of $12,000, and he expressed thanks to them. He stated that according to statistics, Lake County was nearing its pre-pandemic ratios, noting that the circulation rate was over a million items circulated through the system to date, and that there were 689,472 books. He relayed that the Lake County Library System was strong, and that people were using it.
Commr. Parks mentioned that he was a liaison to the Lake County Historical Society, and that he had some meetings with the leadership there and with the Town of Montverde about doing a display or a small museum in the Town of Montverde. He commented that they wanted to build a new building, and that they would have space there. He relayed his understanding that there was extensive Native American History in the Town of Montverde, which included the Seminole and Timucuan history. He opined that the local history was very interesting, and that he hoped to have more news on that later in the year.
Commr. Campione reported on the Transportation Disadvantaged Committee at the Lake-Sumter Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), which met on August 30, 2021. She commented that they had to take care of business required by State laws regarding the annual operating report and making appointments to committees, such as a grievance committee to oversee the evaluation of the Transportation Disadvantaged Coordinator. She mentioned that they were having a difficult time filling positions for drivers, opining that this was happening statewide. She said that they provided trips for basic needs, such as doctor visits and dialysis, and that the cost per trip increased because there were less trips during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. She stated that this cost was reflected in the budget and some of the funds that were having to be allocated to provide for this service. She mentioned that she had also attended a League of Cities luncheon on behalf of the Board, and that Lake County Sheriff Peyton Grinnell was the speaker, adding that he reviewed the budgetary needs and challenges of the Lake County Sheriff’s Office. She opined that it was a very good meeting, and that it was well received by the County’s municipal partners.
Commr. Blake commented that the Medical Examiner’s Office Oversight Committee item was on the BCC agenda, and that he had no other meetings to report.
citizen question and comment period
Mr. Vance Jochim, a City of Tavares resident, asked about Inspector General Audits, and opined that the County should have internal audits of operations. He mentioned that the proposed millage was $585 million, opining that there should be one auditor for every $100 million. He commented that the Lake County School Board did not do that, and that he had spoken to them about it. He relayed his understanding that the County was responsible for the budgets, policies, controls, and procedures over how it was done, opining that the County should start initiating audits of some of the major risk areas. He commented that the millage and budget documentation was deep in the agenda, and he opined that the County should create separate agendas for budget hearings. He remarked that the Town of Montverde was receiving $4 million for septic systems to sewer systems conversion, and opined that it should be spread out among all the Cities.
Commr. Parks stated that everything he did was checked with the County Attorney and the Florida Commission on Ethics, and that it had been addressed many times over the years.
Ms. Patricia Duncan, a resident of Lake County, commended the Board for working with the City of Eustis to encourage novel ideas for the area, and said that it was truly appreciated.
Ms. Cindy Newton, a resident of Lake County, commented that she encouraged joint sessions for all the Cities to help with development plans. She noted that the Friends of the Wekiva River had come up with new studies on the aquifer, and that the County could connect with them for information.
Ms. Susan Fetter, a resident of the City of Leesburg, and a member of the Keep Lake Beautiful advisory board, commented that one of the roles of government was to provide infrastructure and services that residents could not provide for themselves, and that the Board was to determine the best way to support these services to improve the quality of life for the citizens. She remarked that citizens were expressing concerns about overcrowding, traffic, shortage of fire and emergency medical service (EMS) support, rural protection areas being ignored, and the North Lake County Hospital District experiencing issues, adding that the Lake County Water Authority (LCWA) was being threatened. She explained that the LCWA was an environmental agency that funded water quality projects, provided support to law enforcement, and held environmentally sensitive land, adding that there was a central Florida regional effort to build The Great Florida Riverway that would provide opportunity for ecotourism if the lakes were preserved. She expressed concern that the LCWA’s budget would be subject to reallocation for developer’s projects or big businesses, and she asked if the lakes would be maintained and if tourists would still come to bass tournaments and triathlons. She opined that even with a dedicated staff of scientists and technicians thinking about these things every day, there were risks that were still difficult to mitigate. She noted that many programs and activities were dependent on the quality of the lakes, and hoped that the Board would support the LCWA as it was currently functioning, opining that the County needed this agency.
TAB 2:
PROCLAMATION 2021-111 HUNGER ACTION MONTH
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Blake and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved Proclamation 2021-111 honoring Second Harvest Food Bank, and declaring September 2021 as Hunger Action Month.
Commr. Parks read and presented Proclamation 2021-111 to Ms. Kelly Quintero, Director of Advocacy and Government Relations for Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida.
Ms. Quintero expressed gratitude to Lake County for proclaiming September 2021 as Hunger Action Month, noting that they had served about 80,000 residents who were food-insecure, which meant that they did not know where their next meal would come from. She mentioned that in 2020 there was enough food for six million meals distributed to Lake County residents, and that in 2021 they were going to exceed that. She thanked the County for helping them raise awareness about hunger issues, and she invited the Board to a tour of their facility.
CLERK OF the Circuit COURT and comptroller’s CONSENT AGENDA
On a motion by Commr. Blake, seconded by Commr. Smith and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved the Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller’s Consent Agenda, Item 1, as follows:
List of Warrants
Notice is hereby provided of warrants paid prior to this meeting, pursuant to Chapter 136.06 (1) of the Florida Statutes, which shall be incorporated into the Minutes and filed in the Board Support Division of the Clerk's Office.
County Manager’s CONSENT AGENDA
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Blake and carried unanimously by a vote of 4-0, the Board approved the Consent Agenda, Tabs 4 through 33, as follows:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
Request approval to extend
the 2021 tax roll until completion of the Value Adjustment Board hearings.
There is no fiscal impact.
Request approval and execution of the First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement between Citrus County, Hernando County, Lake County, Marion County, Seminole County and Sumter County for Cost Share of Medical Examiner Services and Related Matters. There is no fiscal impact.
Commissioner Blake is the County's representative on the Medical Examiner's Committee.
Request approval to advertise an Ordinance amending Section 2-90.44, Lake County Code, regarding the Sales Surtax Oversight Advisory Committee. There is no fiscal impact.
Administrative services
Management and Budget
Recommend approval of the Amendment to the Veteran's Court Services contract the Board of County Commissioners approved on May 25, 2021.
Procurement Services
Recommend approval to declare items as surplus and grant authorization to remove them from the County's official fixed asset inventory system records. The fiscal impact (revenue) cannot be determined at this time.
HUMAN RESOURCES AND RISK MANAGEMENT
Recommend approval of:
1. The County's annual loss control insurance policies with Princeton and other insurance companies.
2. Brown & Brown's annual fee for professional services.
3. Pre-funding of the Tenant Users Liability Insurance Program (TULIP). 4. The Office of Procurement Services to execute all supporting documentation.
The estimated fiscal impact for Fiscal Year 2022 is $2,249,919.
Recommend approval of the pay ranges for Fiscal Year 2022 for non-bargaining employees and associated compensation adjustments for compression. The pay ranges begin at a minimum of $12.00 per hour.
AGENCY FOR ECONOMIC PROSPERITY
Recommend approval of the Lake County Arts and Cultural Alliance (ACA) Grant Program. The fiscal impact is not to exceed $10,000 (expenditure - Lake County Arts and Cultural Alliance funding) and is within, and will not exceed, the Fiscal Year 2021 Budget.
Recommend approval:
1. To provide Tourist Development Tax funding for event bid fees related to Lake County's and the Florida Region of USA Volleyball’s bids to host the 2022-2024 American Volleyball Coaches Association Small College Beach Championships at the Hickory Point Beach Sand Volleyball Complex.
2. For the Chairman to execute the agreement with the Florida Region of USA Volleyball, Inc, if Lake County is selected as the event host location.
The fiscal impact is $45,000 ($15,000 per year for 3 years) and would be included in the Fiscal Years 2022, 2023 and 2024 proposed budgets (expenditure - TDT funding). Commission District 3.
Recommend approval of a Memorandum of Agreement to provide funding to the United Arts of Central Florida on behalf of the Lake County Arts and Cultural Alliance. The fiscal impact is $10,000 and is included within the Fiscal Year 2022 proposed budget. (expenditure - Lake County Arts and Cultural Alliance funding).
Recommend approval of a Release of Restrictive Covenants for Lot 37, Lake County Central Park Phase 2, (n/k/a Alternate Keys 3871808, 3871809, 3871810, 3871811, 3871812, 3871813, 3871814, 3871815, 3871816, and 3871817; Lots 2 through 11, Christopher C. Ford Central Park Phase III - Republic Drive, Groveland). There is no fiscal impact.
PUBLIC SAFETY AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Code Enforcement
Recommend approval to advertise an Ordinance amending Section 8-4, Lake County Code, entitled Enforcement Procedures, to prohibit anonymous code enforcement complaints. The fiscal impact is unable to be determined at this time.
Emergency Management
Recommend approval:
1. Of the Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) - American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA).
2. To authorize the Chairman to execute the EMPG-ARPA Agreement for FY 2021-2022 in the amount of $13,926.
3. To authorize the County Manager to execute future amendments/modifications that do not involve financial impact.
4. To authorize the Director of the Office of Emergency Management to execute Exhibit 3 - Single Audits, Audit Compliance Certification (page 31).
5. To authorize the Director of the Office of Emergency Management to execute Attachment G - Certification Regarding Lobbying (page 57).
The fiscal impact of $13,926 (revenue/expenditure) and is 100 percent grant funded.
Recommend approval to:
1. Accept the Emergency Management Preparedness and Assistance (EMPA) Trust Fund Base Grant.
2. Execute the EMPA Trust Fund Base Grant Agreement for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 in the amount of $105,806.
3. Authorize the County Manager to execute future amendments/modifications that do not involve financial impact.
4. Authorize the Director of the Office of Emergency Management to execute Exhibit 2 - Single Audits, Audit Compliance Certification (page 26).
5. Authorize the Director of the Office of Emergency Management to execute Exhibit 3-27-19 Florida Administrative Code, EM Director or Part-Time Coordinator Certification (page 27).
The fiscal impact is $105,806 (revenue/expenditure) and is 100 percent grant funded.
Recommend approval to:
1. Accept the Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) Agreement.
2. Execute the EMGP Agreement for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 in the amount of $98,423.
3. Authorize the County Manager to execute future amendments/modifications that do not involve financial impact.
4. Authorize the Director of the Office of Emergency Management to execute Exhibit 3 - Single Audits, Audit Compliance Certification (page 31).
5. Authorize the Director of the Office of Emergency Management to execute the Certification Regarding Lobbying (page 59).
The fiscal impact is $98,423 (revenue/expenditure) and is 100 percent grant funded.
Fire Rescue
Recommend approval:
1. Of a change order for Contract 20-0905 with PCDG Construction, LLC (Mount Dora, FL); and
2. Of a contingency for additional unexpected costs that may arise during the remainder of the project.
The fiscal impact is $291,276 (expenditure: $179,002.36 change order and $112,273.64 contingency) and is within, and will not exceed, the Fiscal Year 2021 Budget. Commission District 4.
Recommend approval to accept the Fiscal Year 2020 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant, and authorize the County Manager to execute any necessary grant award documents. The fiscal impact is $47,619.05 revenue and $50,000 expenditure ($47,619.05 grant funding and $2,380.95 required 5 percent local match).
Public Safety Support
Recommend adoption of Resolution 2021-140 to rename a portion of County Road 455 (south of Highway 50 to Lost Lake Road) to Ray Goodgame Parkway pursuant to Lake County Code Article V - Uniform Street Addressing System Sec. 18-103(g). The fiscal impact is approximately $4,000 for signage. Commission District 2.
Recommend approval of the Verizon Tower Lease Agreement and Memorandum of Tower Lease Agreement for co-location of communications equipment on a County tower located in South Lake County. The fiscal impact will be $33,000 per year (revenue). Commission District 1.
Recommend approval of the Open Wireless Tower Lease Agreement for co-location of communications equipment on a County tower. The fiscal impact will be $9,540 per year (revenue). Commission District 1.
Recommend approval:
1. Of Contract 21-0408 for generator maintenance and repair services for the Office of Public Safety Support to ACF Standby Systems, LLC (Tampa, FL); and
2. To authorize the Office of Procurement Services to execute all supporting documentation.
The estimated annual fiscal impact of $35,000 (expenditure) is included in the proposed Fiscal Year 2022 Budget.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Facilities Management
Recommend approval:
1. Of Contract 21-0459 for fire door inspection and maintenance services to Life Safety Services, LLC (Louisville, Kentucky); and
2. To authorize the Office of Procurement Services to execute all supporting documentation.
The estimated fiscal impact of $40,000 (expenditure) is within, and will not exceed, the fiscal year budget.
Fleet Management
Recommend approval:
1. Of Contracts 21-0714 with Caskey's Mower Shop and Garden Supply (Tavares, FL), Circuit Motorsports Corp. (Casselberry, FL), Maudlin DB Cumberland Int. (Ocala, FL), Orlando Freightliner, Inc. (Apopka, FL), Ring Power Corporation (St. Augustine, FL), Rush Truck Centers of Central Florida (Orlando, FL), Ten-8 Fire & Safety, LLC (Sanford, FL), and The Truck Shop, Inc. (Okahumpka, FL) for repair services to Lake County vehicles and operating equipment for the Office of Fleet Management.
2. To authorize the Office of Procurement Services to execute all supporting documentation.
The estimated fiscal impact is $217,000 (expenditure) and is within the Fiscal Year 2022 Proposed Budget.
Housing and Community Services
Recommend approval of an agreement with We Care of Lake County, Inc. (Mt Dora, FL) for operation of the Lake County We Care Program effective October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022. The fiscal impact is $116,975 (expenditure) and is within the Fiscal Year 2022 Budget.
Recommend approval of the Third Amendment to the 2018-2021 Local Housing Assistance Plan and First Submission of the 2021-2024 Local Housing Assistance Plan. There is no fiscal impact.
Public Works
Recommend adoption of Resolution 2021-141 to reduce the speed limit from 40 MPH to 30 MPH on Tuscanooga Road, from State Road 50 to 500 feet north of Egg Road in the Mascotte area. The fiscal impact is estimated at $300 (expenditure) and is within, and will not exceed, the Fiscal Year 2021 Budget. Commission District 1.
Recommend approval of the Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Certified Budget for Arthropod Control for the Lake County Mosquito Control Program, pursuant to Section 388.201, Florida Statutes, and Rule 5E-13.027, Florida Administrative Code. The fiscal impact is $36,960.24 (revenue/expenditure - 100 percent grant funded).
Recommend approval:
1. Of a Tender Agreement with Western Surety Company ("Surety"); and
2. Of a Contract with CW Roberts Contracting, Inc. ("CWR") for the Lakeshore Drive and Lake Louisa Road Safety Improvements Project; and
3. To adopt Unanticipated Revenue Resolution 2021-142 for $241,316 to be received from the Surety.
The fiscal impact is $241,315.03 (revenue/expenditure). Commission District 2.
Recommend approval of Contract 21-0542 with Bulldog Sitework, LLC (Lady Lake, FL) for the East Lake Joanna Water Quality Improvements construction project. The total fiscal impact is $222,958.22 ($88,083.22 (expenditure) will be paid from the MSTU Stormwater Fund, $90,000 (revenue/expenditure) will be reimbursed from Lake County Water Authority (LCWA) and $44,875 (revenue/expenditure) will be reimbursed from St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD)). Commission District 4.
Recommend approval of an agreement for grant funding from the Lake County Water Authority (LCWA) for a water quality improvement project at Lake Joanna in the Eustis area. The fiscal impact is $243,238 (revenue/expenditure). Commission District 4.
Coalition for Housing and Economic Development Presentation
Mr. Kent Adcock, executive committee member of the Lake 100, commented that the Coalition for Housing and Economic Development of Lake County (CHED) reported to the Lake 100, and that he was representing them on the current day. He mentioned that in response to the difficulty of employees particularly in education and healthcare being able to find workforce housing, the Lake 100 created CHED, and that at a prior BCC meeting, the Board voted to allow them to move forward. He commented that he was present to give a report on the organization’s progress, noting that CHED was a public/private partnership designed to focus attention on workforce housing, which consisted of 80 to 120 percent of the area median income (AMI). He remarked that within the previous 12 months, there had been a dramatic increase in the cost of housing, and that CHED had considered increasing the AMI to 140 percent because the starting prices of homes were approaching $300,000. He mentioned that the business community was driving this interest, and that businesses, such as Kroger and Amazon, were concerned about workforce housing. He commented that, with a $20,000 grant from the Real Estate Association of Lake and Sumter Counties (RALSC), they conducted a detailed survey on workforce behaviors and trends, and that afterwards they had met with dozens of municipalities, chambers of commerce, and other community groups, such as the Lake County League of Cities. He opined that the absence of workforce housing was an issue, and that without adequate workforce housing, the County could not attract new business development. He commented that the creation of additional age restricted communities was not in the interest of workforce housing, and that impact fees were a challenge for growth, adding that the Board had worked diligently to provide waivers and other means to overcome this challenge. He related that more urban sprawl was not the answer, and that they needed to address the neighborhood and community impacts of additional housing and development. He mentioned that density and zoning needed to be addressed with municipalities and the County, and that they had encouraged stakeholders to read a book entitled Strong Towns: A Bottom-Up Revolution to Rebuild American Prosperity adding that there was a need for smart and intentional growth. He said that there was also a need for infrastructure investments for housing and economic and business development to occur, adding that it was interesting to see the County using ARPA funds for that to occur. He commented that CHED fell under the framework of the Lake 100, which was a leadership and business community, and that they were focused on four key aspects. He stated that the first aspect was to establish tangible and achievable goals as a priority focus for workforce housing only, and that they would not be focusing on affordable housing. He said that the second aspect was to advocate for and consult with stakeholders, such as elected officials at the County or municipal level, leaders, developers, and new business entities that wanted to come to Lake County, adding that CHED could assist them as a catalyst for well-planned and well thought out housing solutions. He stated that the third aspect was to create a speaker series to offer resource assistance to those municipalities desiring workforce housing, noting that the City of Groveland and the Town of Howey-in-the-Hills had expressed an interest in this aspect. He said that the fourth aspect was to develop a model-communities taskforce to explore how to include smart growth and strong town concepts in partnership with municipalities that wanted to think creatively and strategically, opining that it was better to be a catalyst for municipalities than a developer, which would create new challenges. He mentioned that the CHED would be restructuring in the following October, and that Ms. Amelia Swart, founder of 712Marketing Solutions, would be the chair of the CHED, and that he had moved to the executive committee of the Lake 100, adding that Ms. Danielle Stroud would assist in the transition.
Commr. Parks thanked Mr. Adcock for the time he had put into this over the years.
Commr. Smith opined that developing a model communities committee for workforce housing was a good idea.
Mr. Adcock mentioned that if they could create a model community that incorporated a mixture of housing types, it could be replicated, adding that he would like to use property that the County had.
Commr. Smith commented that the model community could include input from developers and the business community.
Mr. Adcock opined that the business community should give input, and that they should also be involved.
Commr. Blake mentioned that the preliminary impact fee study, which was discussed a couple of BCC meetings prior, had recommended that cottage-style homes and tiny homes 800 square feet and smaller should receive a 50 percent discount.
Mr. Adcock commented that it provided a good opportunity, and that the discount in the impact fee would help with the planning and zoning aspect. He mentioned that there were other structural issues in the planning and zoning process which would determine where those units could be built, and that they would have to work through that process.
Commr. Parks mentioned that he had been encouraging residents from south Lake County to participate and follow CHED, opining that Mr. David Colby, with the South Lake Chamber of Commerce, had done a good job there.
Mr. Adcock remarked that the South Lake Chamber of Commerce public policy committee had also been involved in the discussions.
Commr. Parks opined that CHED would unify south Lake County and north Lake County in this effort.
Mr. Adcock commented that CHED had not been able to progress as quickly as they had hoped, and that there were many moving parts involved, opining that they would soon be able to bridge some of those challenges.
Commr. Parks opined that the Board could help with those issues in each of the respective commission districts.
Mr. Adcock remarked that the infrastructure issues were paramount, and that the County was using ARPA funds for that. He commented that CHED wanted to work with those municipalities who were willing to use smart growth principles to make corridors that would increase workforce housing. He mentioned that density and other issues were difficult to negotiate, adding that starting from scratch with a model community was easier than working with development that was already there. He stated that he had helped rebuild the Mississippi Gulf Coast after Hurricane Katrina, and that it was easier to rebuild the right way after everything had been demolished, noting that some of the writers and people from Strong Towns: A Bottom-Up Revolution to Rebuild American Prosperity were part of that process. He said that if they had the resources, they could create a model community which would show the advantages of the program, opining that it would relieve anxiety about growth in the future.
public Hearing: Resolution 2021-143 Solid Waste assessment
Ms. Allison Teslia, Director for the Office of Management and Budget, presented the solid waste assessment, and said that it was used to fund the collection, management, and disposal of residential solid waste and recovered materials in unincorporated Lake County. She mentioned that the assessment rates had to be set annually and were included on the truth in millage (TRIM) notices, and that vacant lots were not assessed. She commented that the assessments could not be used to fund countywide services, such as landfill operations, convenience centers, and hazardous waste disposal. She said that the rates were based on the service level and the service area, and that the proposed rates for the current year were all status quo. She commented that the highlighted column on the presentation was for those who received collection once per week, and that the second highlighted column was for those who received collection twice per week.
The Chairman opened the public hearing.
There being no one who wished to address the Board regarding this matter, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
Commr. Parks mentioned that this enterprise fund was much like a business, and that the fees continued to be one of the lowest in the region. He thanked the staff who worked through the issues brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, opining that they did a good job.
On a motion by Commr. Shields, seconded by Commr. Smith and carried unanimously by a vote of 4-0, the Board approved the following items: Resolution 2021-143 for solid waste assessments for the fiscal year (FY) beginning October 1, 2021; the rates of the assessment; and the assessment roll.
PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION 2021-144 FIRE ASSESSMENTS
Ms. Teslia presented the fire assessment, and said that it was used to fund fire protection services, such as fire suppression, fire prevention, fire building inspections, and basic life support (BLS) services, adding that it could not fund advanced life support (ALS) services. She stated that the assessment rates were based on the following: call data and the distribution of incidents; the allocation of resources and budget; and the proportionate share of each land use. She mentioned that Tindale Oliver and Associates, Inc. had conducted an annual technical study using the most recent budget information, call data, and distribution of resources by land use, and she then displayed the calculated rates that were provided by them on May 25, 2021. She commented that there had been a shift from BLS calls to ALS calls, and that per State law, the fire assessment fee could only cover BLS services, which was why the residential fire assessment fees were being reduced in FY 2022. She remarked that in order to maintain the same service levels, they were proposing an increase in the fire municipal service taxing unit (MSTU) rate, which she would discuss later that current day.
The Chairman opened the public hearing.
There being no one who wished to address the Board regarding this matter, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Blake and carried unanimously by a vote of 4-0, the Board approved the following items: Resolution 2021-144 for fire assessments for the FY beginning October 1, 2021; the rates of assessment; and the assessment roll.
Public Hearing: ordinance 2021-33 Land and Impact Fee Credits
Ms. Marsh placed the proposed ordinance on the floor for reading by title only as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AMENDING CHAPTER 22, SECTION 22-39, LAKE COUNTY CODE; ALLOWING FOR AN ALTERNATIVE TO COMPETITIVE BIDDING IF THE PROJECT'S COST DOES NOT EXCEED THE ESTIMATED COST PROVIDED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Commr. Parks commented this ordinance would allow private businesses to build, and that it would be easier to do road construction.
Commr. Smith mentioned that it would be quicker.
The Chairman opened the public hearing.
There being no one who wished to address the Board regarding this matter, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Blake and carried unanimously by a vote of 4-0, the Board approved the adoption and execution of Ordinance 2021-33 amending Section 22-39, Lake County Code, entitled Dedication of land and impact fee credits, to provide an alternative to the competitive bidding requirements contained within the Transportation Impact Fee Code.
recess and reassembly
The Chairman called a recess at 10:13 a.m. for 8 minutes.
regular agenda
2022 Legislative priorities
Ms. Niki Booth, Executive Office Manager for the County Manager’s Office, presented a review of the proposed 2022 legislative priorities which were first presented at the August 24, 2021 BCC meeting, and stated that she would review the new legislative priorities and the requested action. She mentioned that at the August 24, 2021 BCC meeting, there were seven priorities as follows: Lake Idamere Park recreational and accessibility improvements with a funding request of $500,000 for design and construction; Ferndale Preserve Lake Apopka waterfront improvement with a funding request of $500,000 for construction costs; County Road (CR) 439 Blackwater Swamp and Creek Crossing flood study and design with a funding request of $250,000 for engineering evaluation and design; CR 42, in the Deerhaven area, flood zone crossing improvements with a funding request of $500,000 for design and construction; Fire Station 109 expansion in south Lake County in the City of Clermont area, with a funding request of $1.3 million; State Aid to Libraries with Lake County support for restoring full funding based on the current statutory formula; and the State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) which Lake County received full appropriation for each year. She mentioned that additional legislative priorities requested at the August 24, 2021 BCC meeting included Fire Station 71 in the Bassville Park area, which was constructed in the early 1970s for volunteer fire fighters without 24/7 housing considerations, adding that the station had been susceptible to rodents and insects due to the construction type. She commented that in 2019, the County purchased 2.45 acres on CR 473 for the new location of Fire Station 71, adding that the architectural design was complete, and that the project was estimated to cost $2.2 million. She mentioned that another additional 2022 priority was the Lincoln Park Community Center vocational center in the City of Clermont area, and that the legislative funding request was $152,600 for Building 2 renovation costs. She commented that Clermont Elementary School, formerly the Lincoln Park School, would be closing in 2023, and that the Lake County School Board would build the new Aurelia M. Cole Academy K-8 School. She mentioned that the Lincoln Park South Lake Alliance and Lincoln Park Impact Committee, comprised of community members who formerly attended the Lincoln Park School, wanted to preserve the school or a portion of the school, such as the auditorium and gym, as a historical building. She remarked that committee’s goal was to maintain the building as a center for education and the arts in order to provide education, employment, and entrepreneurship training, as well as creating a place where everyone could come together to build community through the arts and recreational activities. She stated that Building 2, which was slated for the vocational center, would include programs for the following: health sciences; information technology; law; public safety and security; heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration (HVAC/R); electrical; emergency medical technicians (EMT); culinary; general educational development (GED); English for speakers of other languages (ESOL); Computer Literacy; and Writing Skills.
Commr. Parks commented that he was in support of this legislative priority for Lincoln Park and the vocational training it would provide. He opined that the County was focused on workforce training, adding that he was pleased to see Mr. Jimmy Crawford and others with the Lincoln Park South Lake Alliance organization at the current BCC meeting.
Ms. Sharon Keys, President of the Lincoln Park South Lake Alliance, stated that her organization had been working for three years on this project to bring the education-focused community center to fruition. She said that it had started as an initiative to preserve the history and purpose of the Lincoln Park neighborhood, and that it had evolved into a plan to provide much needed vocational training opportunities in the south Lake County region. She mentioned that during this time, they had participated in collaboration with various nonprofit organizations and government entities to identify the needs and potential impact for the south Lake County region. She commented that the City of Clermont had a poverty rate of 10 percent, and that the poverty rate of the surrounding areas was over 20 percent, adding that the cost of living had substantially increased while regional wages had not increased at the same rate. She said that according to the average median income (AMI), about 30 percent of the population of the south Lake County region could not afford the rents and mortgages averages in the area, and that, according to the current demographics, there were over 17,000 individuals in the south Lake County region who could benefit from the program. She opined that these figures would increase in the near future due to rapid population growth, and that the Lincoln Park South Lake Alliance could change the community’s future by providing opportunities to individuals through education. She mentioned that they had the opportunity to enter into an agreement with the Lake County School Board to lease the facilities in exchange for renovations, adding that they could not enter into the formal lease until they raised 75 percent of the renovation funds by 2023. She commented that Lake Tech would be the vocational training arm of this facility, and that they were working with them to find funding for renovations. She remarked that Lake Tech intended to teach GED, ESOL, computer literacy, and resume writing, and that they would expand their program once the community survey was completed. She said that according to House Bill 1507, this survey must prove demand for the specific vocational training programs by potential students and regional employers, and that Lake County had agreed to conduct the technical vocation component of this survey. She commented that some of the potential programs had been spoken of by Ms. Booth, and she asked that the Board would consider adding the renovation budget of $152,600 to the proposed legislative priorities for Lake Tech to begin offering the initial programs in the south Lake County region. She mentioned that Lake Tech already served hundreds of residents at the City of Eustis campus, and that an additional location in the City of Clermont would expand those opportunities for the residents of the south Lake County region who were not able to travel to the City of Eustis and open more seats for north Lake County residents. She stated that they were working with the City of Clermont to conduct the economic impact study, opining that once the programs were offered and identified in the survey, the study would show the positive impact in the lives of individuals and the wellbeing of the entire south Lake County community. She commented that the reason this was important to her was because she had gone to a trade school in the City of Altamonte Springs at the beginning of her education, opining that this training was pivotal in her life, and that this program could also help others.
Ms. Paula Hoisington, a founding board member for the Lincoln Park South Lake Alliance, commented that they had conversations with the Lake County School Board and Lake Tech, and that there was a definite need to bring these programs to the south Lake County area. She mentioned that they wanted to preserve the heritage of the Lincoln Park area, which had the only African American school, and that they wanted to do more than remember history. She stated that they wanted to provide an economic uplift in that area by providing programs and engaging in public/private partnerships, adding that they had discussed this with the Chamber of Commerce and with the surrounding Cities, and that they also saw the need. She commented that if the Board made this project part of the legislative budget, they would go to the City of Tallahassee to request the funds to build the center, opining that if they built it, those who were unemployed, underemployed, and those who were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic would have the opportunity to learn a skill. She opined that children in the area who could not obtain adequate tutoring or adequate programs to keep them engaged would benefit from these programs, and that this center could have an economic impact to all of south Lake County by providing livable wage jobs. She opined that people needed an opportunity to learn to take care of their families, and that building workforce housing could only help those who had the skills to do the work. She concluded that they would like to work with the County to obtain funding, opining that this center could be a model for all of the Central Florida area.
Commr. Parks commented that he personally supported their cause, and he hoped that the other Commissioners would too. He commented that the County would keep them informed, and that there were other funding sources and other plans, such as the City and private businesses.
Commr. Smith mentioned that he was in support of trade schools, opining that expansion to south Lake County was a necessity, and that he was in support of it.
Commr. Campione opined that this was a good project, and that she supported it, adding that she was glad it was included on the 2022 legislative priorities list.
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Shields and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved the proposed 2022 legislative priorities.
Ms. Barker remarked that the County would proceed with preparations to submit their material to the legislative delegation by the deadline of September 30, 2021, adding that they would be meeting with Mr. Chris Carmody, with GrayRobinson P.A., to prepare the next steps for the legislative process.
Discussion regarding the Lake County Water Authority
Ms. Marsh stated that the proposed legislation was to take the Lake County Water Authority (LCWA) from an independent special district to a dependent special district, noting that it would come under the jurisdiction of the BCC who would then be responsible for approving their budget and their millage every year and appointing the members of their board, which would become a board of supervisors. She commented that it would become part of the County code, and that the Board could make changes to their purpose. She said that this discussion was to make the Board aware of the bill, and that a dependent special district could only be created with the consent of the local governing body. She mentioned that if the Board wanted to proceed with the creation of this dependent district, she would create a resolution for the Board to approve, adding that there was a provision in Chapter 189 of the Florida Statutes that stated if one had an active, independent special district, then the Florida Legislature could repeal that once it goes to a vote of the electors. She said that there would have to be some adjustments to the bill, and that if the Board consented to the dependent special district and the bill passed, it would need to go on a general referendum in November 2022 to see if the voters were willing to dissolve it and convert it to a dependent special district.
Commr. Parks clarified that there would be no action taken on the current day, and that this was only a discussion.
Ms. Marsh commented that if the Board wanted to bring back the resolution, it would be presented at the following BCC meeting.
Commr. Campione asked if the LCWA moved to a dependent district, would there still be a separate line item on the tax bills showing the millage rate.
Ms. Marsh confirmed this, adding that it would function the same as it did currently, but that it would fall under the Board’s jurisdiction. She mentioned that the Board would appoint their members and approve their millage and their budget, and that they could make adjustments, noting that it would still show separately.
Commr. Campione inquired if they could share staff and utilize Lake County’s Office of Human Resources, Procurement Services, Fleet Management, and other administrative offices if the LCWA was a dependent district.
Ms. Marsh replied that the County could share resources with the LCWA, and that it would be similar to providing those types of services with the Lake-Sumter MPO.
Commr. Campione commented that she would want to approve this if it could help make more tax revenue available for water quality improvements and projects.
Commr. Parks asked what efficiencies could be achieved.
Ms. Barker stated that efficiencies could be evaluated, noting that there were areas where the County currently worked with the LCWA, such as finance, and that expanding those roles could be looked at.
Commr. Smith asked, if the Board approved it, if it would go to the Florida Legislature and then to the residents to vote on, and Ms. Marsh said that was correct.
Commr. Parks commented that he was confused about how it worked, opining that the legislature could do a significant amount without the Board’s approval.
Ms. Marsh stated that Chapter 189 of the Florida Statutes specifically addressed what the legislature could do with dissolving an independent district and creating a dependent district, adding that if the legislature did not want to comply with that, they would have to change those statutory provisions and then adopt this bill.
Commr. Campione asked what the difference was between this and the South Lake County Hospital District where the legislature eliminated the independent district.
Ms. Marsh said that if it qualified as an independent special district it should have gone to a referendum, but to her knowledge, it did not.
Commr. Campione mentioned that Representative Keith Truenow could do a workshop with the Board, adding that they could find out what additional benefits could be obtained, such as water quality and state involvement in funding. She mentioned that the water quality treatment for Lake Apopka was paid for by the taxpayers, which was part of a project funded by the State, and that it might be an area where the County could save funds if the State would take over the treatment cost. She opined that the County could gain greater access to State funding for water quality projects, and that the Board should receive more information before adopting a resolution.
Commr. Shields opined that cost savings were not worth sacrificing water quality, which was very important in Lake County, adding that he did not support the proposed legislation. He mentioned that he had not known before the current BCC meeting that it would go before the voters, and that he would be in favor of learning more.
The Chairman opened the floor for public comment.
Mr. Jochim mentioned that he used to attend the LCWA meetings, opining that they had a strong manager who gave the quarterly reports. He opined that their board was controlled by environmentalists, and that their focus was on environmental issues and not big-picture items. He opined that much of their funding was for Lake Apopka, and that Lake County taxes were paying to treat the water that flowed from Lake Apopka, which was not clean because of some previous farming practices. He opined that the big-picture items were being missed, and that the County staff was more focused and aware of issues and contacts, opining that creating a dependent special district would be a good thing if there was a strong manager appointed rather than a technical expert. He commented that he had gone to a LCWA budget hearing, and that he was concerned by it, adding that he was glad to hear that they were using the County’s finance system. He opined that the LCWA could use help with funding and grants, and that they could use County staff as was mentioned. He opined that this would be a good thing, and that the County could provide better leadership and select better managers.
Ms. Cindy Newton, a resident of unincorporated Lake County, commented that she had learned a lot about the lakes, the soil, retention, and high recharge areas from listening to the LCWA and BCC meetings, and she opined that a separate entity did a better job. She said that she had confidence in this Board appointing board members for the LCWA, but that she did not know what this Board was going be like in five or ten years and who they would appoint. She opined that it should be in the voters’ hands, and that voters’ rights should not be changed. She opined that short-term solutions were not always good for the long-term, and that more discussion and information was needed, adding that she would like the workshop to be opened to the public.
Mr. Banks Helfrich, Seat 1 for the Lake Soil and Water Conservation District, commented that the choices were to allow the people to vote for representatives for the LCWA or to allow the BCC, who were also elected, to decide who would be on that board. He said that he supported local government, opining that voters should decide who the BCC would be and who the LCWA board would be. He opined that keeping local government local would keep democracy in the immediacy, and that it would allow them to speak and have their concerns heard by the Board.
Ms. Lavon Silvernell, a resident of the Town of Astatula, commented that she had attended LCWA meetings and BCC meetings, opining that the BCC’s top priority was economic growth and economic health. She mentioned that she had listened to discussions regarding balancing the budget, opining that the budget struggles came from choices the Commission had made in the past to benefit development at any cost. She expressed concern about how rapidly Lake County was growing, opining that the County could outgrow its resources and its infrastructure. She stated that she would like to see the LCWA remain an independent entity elected by the voters, opining that open spaces and natural areas to recharge clean water into the aquifer, as well as other things, were necessary for a healthy community. She opined that Lake County needed an entity that was focused on environmental services, and that the LCWA should be left alone.
There being no one else who wished to address the Board regarding this matter, the Chairman closed the floor for public comment.
Commr. Smith asked if there would be a workshop between the BCC and the LCWA.
Commr. Campione remarked that she would like to hear from Representative Truenow.
Commr. Parks commented that he would like to hear about what efficiencies could be achieved.
Commr. Campione mentioned that she was appreciative of the service provided by the LCWA, and that she was not suggesting that they were not doing a good job. She commented that she was interested in how things could be done better, and that she would support everybody on the LCWA board currently.
Commr. Shields mentioned that the BCC was involved with many things, and questioned who would be responsible for the LCWA’s duties. He asked for information on how that would be separated out in a workshop, pointing out the possibility that none of them would be on the Board in 10 years.
Commr. Parks commented that the Board should ask these questions, and that the County could include them in the workshop discussion, adding that the public would not be excluded.
Commr. Smith suggested that a decision should wait until after the workshop.
Commr. Blake mentioned that he had spoken to Representative Truenow on the current day about this issue, and that if this was approved by the voters, any political or policy questions would go to the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). He commented that it was easier to elect different representatives for the LCWA than for the BCC, opining that the workshop was a good idea, and that it would be good to know what efficiencies could be achieved before the Board took an official position on it.
Ms. Barker stated that they would work on a plan for the workshop and contact Representative Truenow’s office.
villages Roadway improvement agreement
Ms. Barker presented an overview of the agreement with The Villages outlining some of the details, and she showed a map of the proposed roadway improvements. She said that The Villages of West Lake would be constructed along CR 470 and CR 48 in the City of Leesburg, and that the mixed use development would have about 14,000 residential units and 4.1 million square feet of nonresidential space. She mentioned that because of the large influx of both nonresidential and residential properties, the County would have to improve CR 470 to accommodate the increased traffic demands. She commented that the map showed the three phases, noting that it would go from the county line between Lake and Sumter Counties to Meggison Road. She said that the roadway improvements would be constructed as a four-lane urban collector road with a median 22 feet wide, 23 feet of lane width, a sidewalk on one side of CR 470, and 100 feet of roadway right of way. She commented that The Villages would fund the initial construction for $10 million in impact fee credits, adding that the County would reimburse them $6.5 million in cash, which would be done in phases. She mentioned that as each phase was completed and there were 2,500 homes on the tax rolls for at least a year, the County would begin paying installments for that phase. She commented that in addition to constructing CR 470, The Villages would also provide $1.3 million in cash to the County for the final widening of CR 466A in the City of Fruitland Park, noting that there were currently two sections completed, and that the middle section was waiting to be expanded into the four-lane road. She said that The Villages would receive transportation impact fee credits for the $1.3 million, and that they would donate all right of way, stormwater ponds, and easements for the project on CR 470.
Commr. Parks commented that this development would all be in the City of Leesburg, and that it was not a development approved by the BCC. He mentioned that there would be many high wage jobs created by the hospital facility and the research and health industries planned for The Villages in Lake County, adding that the agreement facilitated a large economic growth opportunity for the County.
Commr. Blake commented that there would be a large impact from the teaching hospital on that part of the county, and that it would be a regional benefit, adding that it would bring medical industry jobs to that area.
Commr. Smith opined that it was important for the County to provide the infrastructure before the development, adding that there were issues in south Lake County because the infrastructure came after the development.
On a motion by Commr. Blake, seconded by Commr. Smith and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved the proposed development agreement with The Villages for road improvements on CR 470 in the City of Leesburg.
WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME SELECTION COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Blake and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved the appointments of Ms. Phyllis Smith (representing District 1), Ms. Mary R. Kelly (representing District 2), Ms. Nanette Cobb (representing District 3), Ms. Tracy Belton (representing District 4), and Ms. Jean Martin (representing District 5) to the Women's Hall of Fame Selection Committee.
reports
county manager
covid-19 testing
Ms. Barker stated that COVID-19 testing would be provided at the Lake County Expo Center/Fairgrounds by Nomi Health at no cost to the County, adding that they would bill the client’s health insurance or seek federal funding to cover the testing. She commented that the County waived the fee for use of the facility, and added that they would provide COVID-19 testing for a little over two weeks. She then introduced Ms. Cari Branco as the new Assistant County Manager over the Community Services Department, which included the Offices of Parks and Trails, Veteran Services, Housing and Community Services, Library Services, and Extension Services.
commissioners reports
commissioner shields – district 1
9/11 ceremony breakfast
Commr. Shields stated that he attended a 9/11 ceremony breakfast in the City of Leesburg for first responders.
commissioner smith – vice chairman and district 3
County Manager's
expenditure authority
Commr. Smith stated that currently, the County Manager had a spending limit of $25,000, and that anything over that had to come before the Board for approval. He asked the Board to increase the County Manager's expenditure authority from $25,000 to $75,000, and that it would keep the Board from having to review many unnecessary items.
Commr. Campione commented that this proposal put Lake County more in line with what other Counties were doing, and that it would help with some of the items that could be addressed directly by the County Manager. She mentioned that there would still be full transparency, and that the Board would still receive notification of what was being done.
Commr. Parks mentioned that this was not an unusual request, and that it could shorten the BCC meeting agendas.
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Shields and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved to increase the County Manager's expenditure authority from $25,000 to $75,000, amend Board Policy LCC-18 so that it only addresses the County Manager's Expenditure Authority, and amend Board Policy LCC-39 to expand it to cover Purchasing Policy and Contract Administration.
advertising of additional Board meetings
Commr. Smith mentioned that since BCC meetings could be very long, he proposed that the County could advertise an additional Board meeting date every month, adding that if the BCC meeting was long, it could be resumed the following day without having to advertise again. He opined that it would be more efficient, and said that if the BCC meeting was not too long, there would not be a meeting on the following day.
Commr. Parks commented that zoning hearings could be very long, opining that the Board wanted to be fresh to make good decisions. He mentioned that if it was advertised, the County might not use it, but that it would help if it was needed.
Commr. Blake remarked that it would prevent the Board from scheduling anything else on those days, and that it could limit flexibility to be other places.
Ms. Marsh stated that there were reoccurring meetings the Wednesday after the first BCC meeting of each month for the Code Enforcement Special Master, and that the County could put those on a different day, adding that it would take a couple of months to make the adjustments.
Commr. Parks opined that the Board Chambers could be held from 8:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m., and that it was a good idea.
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Blake and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved the advertising of an additional Board meeting date every month.
Haul Permits Discussion
Commr. Smith opined that the haul permit was inconsistent, and that it was targeting one group. He asked if it was ten cents per cubic yard.
Ms. Marsh stated that the County had a study done, and that it had showed ten cents per cubic yard.
Commr. Smith asserted that ten cents per cubic yard was not sufficient to pay for the infrastructure, and Ms. Barker confirmed that was correct. Commissioner Smith proposed that it should be done away with.
Commr. Blake commented that he would be in support of that.
Commr. Parks inquired if that would prohibit the County from collecting on a large operation with a considerable amount of traffic, and if it could be negotiated through a mining conditional use permit.
Ms. Marsh said that the County would look at the mining ordinance, adding that it could be amended, and that the County would bring forward an ordinance to repeal the haul permit.
Commr. Parks commented that the Board would like to bring that forward, and that he would look at the mining conditional use permit.
Ms. Marsh stated that the County would move forward with drafting that ordinance.
commissioner campione –district 4
homelessness
mitigation
Commr. Campione mentioned that she was the liaison to the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, and that they had been trying to formulate policies to address homelessness mitigation as well as affordable housing. She commented that they worked with a coalition of four Counties established through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and that additional funds from them could be obtained through grants and matching funds. She mentioned that some communities used these funds to supplement existing projects, and that Lake County had not been utilizing this resource until a couple of years ago. She commented that HUD operated under the Housing First model, which promoted ending homelessness by providing clean, safe, affordable housing, as well as a positive support system because of other issues in individuals’ lives. She said that people had been moved from homelessness into housing in Lake County through the Mid Florida Homeless Coalition, but that it had been limited because of a lack of housing inventory. She mentioned that this program was based on self-sufficiency, noting that people received transitional housing first, and that they had to meet certain milestones in order to progress to a permanent housing situation, which was also limited because of a lack of inventory. She proposed that the County use ARPA funds that had been allocated for homelessness mitigation and affordable housing to create a request for proposal (RFP) and seek local builders to build units similar to the Habitat for Humanity template. She suggested that the County could use infill tracts and vacant property to increase the inventory by building housing, and that it could then be used in conjunction with HUD waivers, which provided about $700 per month for rent. She mentioned that the County could charge $700 per month for the tenets, and that those tenets would be vetted through the Mid Florida Homeless Coalition in conjunction with the County housing department, adding that there would be obligations people would have to keep in order to use their voucher to stay in that housing. She commented that the County would have to move quickly with the RFP, and that any builders would have to build at a market rate, adding that impact fee waivers and building permit fee waivers could reduce costs. She mentioned that this proposal was consistent with recommendations received from the State of Florida when they reviewed the homelessness mitigation de facto policies that the County was using, and that this was consistent with policies adopted through the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) and through Lake County housing policies. She remarked that this mirrored some of the things heard from CHED, such as creating affordable housing stock, and that, if this did not work or the need was no longer there, the inventory could be sold to the private sector, and that the funds could be used for the affordable housing trust funds, which helped with SHIP programs and down payment assistance. She opined that it could be a sustainable program, and that the rent payments could help keep the program going, adding that the County could become involved with other affordable housing projects in partnership with the private sector. She commented that this would not compete with the private sector because the private sector was not offering rental units for $700 per month, and that the County would be filling a great need.
Commr. Blake inquired if this would be something that could be outsourced to a non-profit organization, opining that the County should not become a landlord.
Commr. Campione replied that in order to start it, the County would have to take a very active role, and that once the units were constructed and the program was operational, it could then transition to a non-profit organization. She opined that this proposal would not have the resources required unless the County took an active role, adding that there was extensive expertise in the AHAC and through the County staff regarding the use of SHIP funds to build housing units. She said that the County would oversee the construction process and be involved from a staff level, and that a separate non-profit entity could be the owner, adding that there were many options for that. She stated that the County currently had vouchers that residents could use, but that there was no place to put them. She opined that it was frustrating to know that people could be moving into transitional and then permanent housing, but that there was nowhere that would accept $700 per month for rent.
Commr. Smith inquired if the County could build it and then deed it to a non-profit.
Commr. Campione remarked that if there was an agreement in place, the non-profit could provide the rental units for the Lake County residents who qualified for that assistance. She commented that the Mid Florida Homeless Coalition currently had a list of people that would qualify for those vouchers, and that the County also had a list of people who had contacted the housing department that would qualify. She said that the County would have to have an agreement with that entity stating that the facility was there to house those clients, and that if the facility was no longer going to be under that agreement, then the proceeds would have to go back to the County.
Commr. Parks asked how much the amount would be.
Ms. Barker stated that there currently was $3 million of ARPA funds allocated for affordable housing.
Commr. Parks commented that this proposal could come out of that, opining that the Board should move forward.
Commr. Campione remarked that if there was a consensus, then the County could work on RFP documents, adding that there could be builders interested. She commented that there would need to be template to make sure the housing was marketable and consistent with the neighborhood, and that they could be built in the regions where they could be utilized by those who lived there. She mentioned that representatives from the Cities attending the AHAC meeting were interested in working with the County, opining that they could possibly donate land for that purpose. She said that if the Board was agreeable to the concept, she would work with staff to refine the details and reach out to the building community.
Commr. Shields opined that the Cities were trying to solve the same issues, and that it would be good to work with them because the County would not have to worry about septic systems and wells, which would add to the cost.
Commr. Campione agreed that building these units in the municipalities would be better and that it would also provide proximity to public transportation and services. She mentioned that if available lots were not in a municipality, they would still be valuable, adding that there was a variety of housing locations and types that would work. She commented that the Cities could provide waivers for water and sewer connection fees, and that they could donate land parcels. She said that the County could assist with building the units, and that Lake County residents could utilize it for transitional housing, noting that there were 60 to 70 new people on the homeless list. She mentioned that once they moved out of this housing, these units would be available for the next individual, and that eventually they could become permanent affordable housing stock.
Commr. Parks remarked that there was consensus to move forward, but that there needed to be something in place to ensure that the County did not become a landlord or a de facto housing authority.
Commr. Campione opined that CHED might be willing to act as a landlord.
Commr. Parks commented that he had seen the disaster response housing made from shipping containers, opining that something like that could provide a safe place.
Commr. Campione commented that there was a group that provided some housing units in the City of Leesburg through Habitat for Humanity and the Lake County Schools, and that some of the students worked on the houses, noting that they had some good templates that could work for this project. She mentioned that those were the things she would like explore, and that she would also be open to have Habitat for Humanity help with this project. She stated that the key was to quickly construct the units, noting that the vouchers were available currently, and that the needs were immediate.
Commr. Parks remarked that once she put together a plan with staff, the Board could then act on it.
Commr. Campione said that she would start working on that, and that she would bring back more details.
COMMISSIONER BLAKE – DISTRICT 5
resolution against the enforced vaccine mandate
Commr. Blake proposed that a resolution be drafted to respond to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) enforced vaccine mandate by the Federal Government for companies with more than 100 employees. He opined that the County should stand up for the rights of Lake County residents to make their own healthcare decisions without being threatened with losing their jobs, adding that, according to vaccination data, the mandate could overwhelmingly affect lower income residents. He mentioned that there were several studies that provided evidence of the benefits of natural immunity, opining that the federal government had not taken into account that major component of the COVID-19 pandemic. He stated that a response would be symbolic, but he opined that it was important, adding that he would bring it forward for input from the Board.
Commr. Parks commented that he would support that resolution, opining that even though he supported vaccinations, residents should seek advice from their doctors first.
Commr. Blake opined that even though vaccination was the right decision for many people, people who had been infected with COVID-19 also had protection. He opined that the County should take a stance on the role of the government in making private health decisions for people.
Commr. Smith asked if this resolution would be presented at the following BCC meeting, and Commissioner Blake said that it would.
commissioner parks – Chairman and district 2
Letter of support for the Town of Montverde
Commr. Parks asked that the Board would approve a letter of support to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission for the Town of Montverde's grant application for the construction of a boat ramp, and he stated that there was no fiscal impact.
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Shields and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved the letter of support to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
friends of lake apopka discussion
Commr. Parks commented that he had received a request from the Friends of Lake Apopka to support their letter to the Governor seeking an allocation of funds from the Land Acquisition Trust Fund so that Lake Apopka restoration activities could continue. He clarified that the State Legislature had previously allocated $5 million a year from the Land Acquisition Trust Fund, and that this was done in 2016 per Florida Statute 375.041(3)(b)(3), but that in previous years it was not allocated towards Lake Apopka, adding that this letter to the Governor asked him to make sure that those funds were allocated towards the restoration of Lake Apopka.
On a motion by Commr. Shields, seconded by Commr. Smith and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved to support the Friends of Lake Apopka’s letter to the Governor seeking an allocation of funds from the Land Acquisition Trust Fund.
Access 67 initiative representative appointment
Commr. Parks stated that he had received a letter from the Florida Association of Counties (FAC) regarding the ACCESS 67 Initiative, which was promoting broadband throughout all 67 counties. He said that they had asked for a representative from the Board to serve on a select committee to participate on those discussions, advocating, collaborating, and educating on broadband policy for solutions and practices. He nominated Commissioner Smith.
Commr. Smith said that he would be happy to represent Lake County.
Commr. Parks asked if a motion was required for that.
Ms. Marsh stated that even though it was not on the BCC agenda, it could be considered an administrative item, adding that a motion could be made to add it to the agenda and then voted on.
On a motion by Commr. Blake, seconded by Commr. Smith and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved to appoint Commissioner Smith to serve on this committee.
Lake County Tax Collector's Service Center
Commr. Parks stated that there was an opportunity to acquire the building being used by the Lake County Tax Collector, and that the County would save funds if the building was bought rather than making lease payments. He commented that it would cost about $3.05 million, and that the request was only for the negotiation, adding that it might not be a possibility.
Ms. Marsh said that this would authorize the County to negotiate the purchase agreement, and that it would also authorize the Chairman to sign that purchase agreement. She commented that there would have to be appraisals and surveys, and that the landlord wanted to close by the end of the current year. She stated that if the County had not completed its due diligence by then, the landlord had agreed to sign a separate contract that would survive closing, and that he would correct any deficiencies that the County’s due diligence had brought forth. She commented that the County currently paid $160,000 per year to lease the facility, which included being responsible for the property taxes and the maintenance on this property.
On a motion by Commr. Blake, seconded by Commr. Smith and carried unanimously by a 4-0 vote, the Board approved the following items: to negotiate and enter into a Purchase Agreement with Prickett Partners, LLLP, for the Lake County Tax Collector's Northwest Regional Service Center located at 1720 North Citrus Boulevard in Leesburg; authorization to terminate the Lease Agreement at closing; and authorization for the Chairman to execute any necessary closing documents.
20th anniversary of 9/11
Commr. Parks thanked everyone who participated in organized events to remember the 20th anniversary of 9/11. He stated that he had attended a race of 1,500 people in the City of Clermont, an event in the City of Tavares at the Lake County Historic Courthouse, and then an event at the Clermont Performing Arts Center. He mentioned that the Board had participated in various events, opining that it was an important day to remember.
Eustis City Commission Meeting
Commr. Parks reported that he had attended a Eustis City Commission meeting, and that the City did not require annexation of Lake County Fire Station 39 near the East Lake Sports and Community Complex in order to provide water services. He relayed that the County was committed to move forward with the planning for Thrill Hill Road, and commented that he would meet with the mayor and others to finish the planning process within the next few months. He commented that he reassured the City of Eustis that the Joint Planning Area (JPA) was not trying to hinder what the City was doing, but that it was a way to show respect and work together through the process.
Ms. Marsh mentioned that the City had agreed to have a workshop on making their Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) amendments as it related to removing certain items from their Comp Plan, and that it was planned for October 2021, adding that the public would be invited to attend.
recess and reassembly
The Chairman called a recess at 11:58 a.m. until the 5:05 p.m. Budget Public Hearing.
5:05 BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING
PRESENTATION OF tentative MILLAGE RATES and tentative budget
Ms. Barker stated that one of the main areas of focus in the following year’s budget preparation was addressing the minimum wage adjustment that was approved by the voters in November 2020, and that the Board recommended a $12.00 minimum wage. She commented that additional funding for road resurfacing had been identified, and that the Board and staff had worked together in developing the budget, adding that she appreciated everyone’s help.
Ms. Teslia stated that this was the FY 2022 first public hearing for the millage rates and budget overseen by the Lake County BCC, and that information for the Lake County School Board or any other taxing authority in Lake County was available, noting that the purpose of the current BCC meeting was to present the proposed millage rates over the rollback rates, and then the tentative budget for FY 2022. She commented that the State’s definition of the rollback millage rate was a rate that, when applied to the next year’s tax base, excluding new construction, would generate the same revenue as was appraised in the previous year. She said that she would then turn it over to the Chairman to open the public hearing, and that following this, they would have four actions to adopt the tentative millage rates for FY 2022, adopt the changes to the recommended budget, approve of the FY 2022 tentative budget, and approve of the public hearing date for final adoption. She then presented the final property values for FY 2021 and compared them to the FY 2022 certified values. She mentioned that the countywide millage rates for the General Fund, the Lake County Ambulance MSTU, and the Lake County Public Lands-Voted Debt Service millage each increased by 7.9 percent. She mentioned that the Lake County Stormwater, Parks and Roads MSTU increased by 7.22 percent, and that the Lake County Fire Rescue MSTU increased by 11.66 percent. She noted that this increase was partly due to the coverage area expansion into the City of Fruitland Park and the City of Mascotte, adding that the Town of Montverde would come onto the tax roll the following year. She also said that the final property values for FY 2022 would be available on October 1, 2021. She stated that Chapters 129 and 200 of the Florida Statutes outlined the procedures for the annual adoption of tax rates and budgets and required that the proposed millage rates for the FY 2022 as well as any adjustments considered by the Board be identified. She commented that the proposed FY 2022 Lake County General Fund operating millage was 5.0529 mills, which was an increase of 0.0202 mills from the FY 2021 rate and a 4.5 percent increase over the rollback tax rate of 4.8351 mills. She related that the proposed FY 2022 Lake County Ambulance MSTU millage was 0.4629, which was equal to the FY 2021 rate and a 4.09 percent increase over the rollback rate of 0.4447 mills. She stated that the proposed FY 2022 Lake County Stormwater, Parks and Roads MSTU millage was 0.4957 mills, which was equal to the FY 2021 rate and a 4.58 percent increase over the rollback tax rate of 0.4740 mills. She commented that the proposed FY 2022 Lake County Fire Rescue MSTU millage was 0.5138 mills, which was an increase of 0.0434 mills from the FY 2021 rate and an 18.77 percent increase over the rollback tax rate of 0.4326 mills. She mentioned that the proposed FY 2022 Lake County Public Lands-Voted Debt Service millage, which did not factor into the rollback calculations as it was approved by a referendum, was 0.0918 mills, which was 0.0182 mills less than the FY 2021 rate. She commented that based on the calculation from the Florida Department of Revenue on the DR-420 Certification of Taxable Value form, the current year’s proposed aggregate rate of 6.5253 was 5.48 percent over the rolled back rate. She said that the proposed tentative budget included all the Infrastructure Sales Tax projects that were approved on August 24, 2021, and that they had all been incorporated. She mentioned that it fully funded Judicial Support, the Constitutional Offices, and County departments, and that it reflected a General Fund reserve total of $22.26 million, which was about 14.45 percent of the operating budget. She stated that the County had some items that would be presented for the public hearing that had come up since finalizing this document which would bring down the reserves to about 14 percent, adding that the General Fund millage of 5.0529 mills was used to estimate the ad valorem revenue, and that about 2.1 percent of that was allocated towards road resurfacing. She presented a breakdown of the additional funding allocated towards road resurfacing in the General Fund, noting that the Florida Department of Health and LifeStream Behavioral Center were being allocated to ARPA for the following three years, but that they would come back to the General Fund once the ARPA funding expired. She mentioned that with the $2.75 million identified from the General Fund and the $1.13 million in the Infrastructure Sales Tax fund, the total additional funding for road resurfacing was about $3.88 million in the proposed budget, adding that the Lake County Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller had identified an additional $70,000 in excess fees that the County would receive in FY 21, and that it would be adjusted on the second public hearing. She presented the proposed staffing changes for FY 2022, and commented that there was a net total of 14 positions being proposed for FY 2022, which included a part time position that was added during the current fiscal year for Lake County Animal Services and the extension of two limited term probation officers.
Commr. Parks pointed out that the County reduced the debt service millage and increased the General Fund millage rate by a like amount.
Commr. Campione opined that it could be confusing because it did not state what the like amount was, and that it only showed the total.
Commr. Parks mentioned that it was discussed in a July 2021 BCC meeting, and that there was no net difference because it was raised in one area and reduced in another.
Ms. Barker stated that they were both countywide millage rates, and that in order to provide additional funding at the Board’s request, the debt service millage was lowered because it could only be used to fund debt service. She said that the County increased the General Fund millage by the same amount, noting that it would bring in the additional revenue which could be used for road resurfacing projects.
Commr. Parks commented that it provided extra funding for road resurfacing, and that nobody was being charged more on their taxes.
Ms. Barker mentioned that the fire assessment was reduced because of the increase in the ALS services being provided, which resulted in an increased MSTU tax rate for fire services in order to maintain the same service level.
Commr. Parks expressed appreciation for the Constitutional Officers and the County staff who all contributed to reduce the initial proposed budgets.
public hearing
The Chairman opened the public hearing.
Mr. Jochim expressed concern that the County was raising the millage rate 5.48 percent above the rollback rate, and he cited some statistics from the U.S. Bureau of Labor. He mentioned that there were many inflation indicators that showed a high inflation rate, and he expressed concern about hyperinflation. He opined that the County should take a stand to protect the citizens by reducing any tax which could result in people losing their homes, and that the County should cut back on funding to stakeholders, administration, and benefits.
There being no one else who wished to address the Board regarding this matter, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
Commr. Parks commented that he also had concerns about hyperinflation, and that it could be an issue. He mentioned that the County had a responsibility to provide services to the residents, and that the cost to provide those services was increasing. He opined that the staffing levels were the same as they were in 2006, and that the County was doing more with less, adding that Lake County had one of the lowest millage rates compared to the surrounding counties.
MILLAGE RESOLUTIONS
On a motion by Commr. Shields, seconded by Commr. Smith and carried by a vote of 3-1, the Board approved to adopt the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 tentative millage rates for the Lake County General Countywide Levy at 5.0529 mills, the Lake County Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU) for Ambulance and Emergency Services at 0.4629 mills, the Lake County MSTU for Stormwater, Parks and Roads at 0.4957 mills, and the Lake County Fire Rescue MSTU at 0.5138 mills for a total of 6.5253 mills, and the Lake County Voter Approved Debt at 0.0918 mills.
Commr. Blake voted no.
Commr. Blake commented that he had promised constituents that he would only vote in support of a rollback rate budget, noting that the voters of Lake County had approved the minimum wage increase, which the County had to provide.
Commr. Smith mentioned that the minimum wage increase had a large impact on the budget, and that the total millage rate was five percent over rollback, not five percent higher than the previous year.
Ms. Barker said that the County could show that at the September 28, 2021 BCC meeting.
Ms. Teslia commented that the difference was less than one percent.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO THE FY 2022 RECOMMENDED BUDGET
Ms. Teslia remarked that since the approval of the recommended budget in July 2021, there had been the following changes for the County Departments and Offices: the fund balance and revenue projections which included the Infrastructure Sales Tax approved project list from the August 24, 2021 BCC meeting had been incorporated; various capital projects had been re-budgeted such as road resurfacing and construction; purchase order (PO) carryforward estimates had been incorporated; and other miscellaneous changes and adjustments. She mentioned that a summary of changes for Constitutional Offices included the following: the Lake County Sheriff’s Office reduced their budget by $500,000; and the Supervisor of Elections reduced their budget by $150,000. She commented that the Lake County Tax Collector’s budget submitted on July 29, 2021 increased by about $558,000, and that the Tax Collector was reestablishing security guards in the service centers and purchasing capital equipment, such as a cash recycler and a security machine for the service centers. She concluded with the requested action for approval to adopt the changes to the FY 2022 recommended budget totaling $35,290,714.
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Shields and carried by a vote of 3-1, the Board approved to adopt the changes to the FY 2022 recommended budget totaling $35,290,714.
Commr. Blake voted no.
FY 2022 TENTATIVE BUDGET
Ms. Teslia stated that the requested action was for approval to adopt the FY 2022 tentative budget totaling $585,202,932.
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Shields
and carried by a vote of 3-1, the Board approved to
adopt the FY 2022 tentative budget totaling $585,202,932.
Commr. Blake voted no.
FINAL BUDGET
HEARING
Ms. Teslia requested approval to hold a public hearing for the final adoption of the FY 2022 millage rates and budget on September 28, 2021 at 5:05 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible in the BCC Chambers.
On a motion by Commr. Smith, seconded by Commr. Shields and carried unanimously by a vote of 4-0, the Board approved to hold a public hearing for the final adoption of the FY 2022 millage rates and budget on September 28, 2021, at 5:05 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible in the BCC Chambers, 315 West Main Street, Tavares, Florida.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to be brought to the attention of the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
_________________________________
SEAN PARKS, chairman
ATTEST:
________________________________
GARY J COONEY, CLERK