A regular MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

december 4, 2018

The Lake County Board of County Commissioners met in regular session on Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of County Commissioners’ Meeting Room, Lake County Administration Building, Tavares, Florida. Commissioners present at the meeting were: Leslie Campione, Chairman; Wendy Breeden, Vice Chairman; Timothy I. Sullivan; Sean Parks; and Josh Blake. Others present were: Jeff Cole, County Manager; Melanie Marsh, County Attorney; Niki Booth, Executive Office Manager, County Manager’s Office; Kristy Mullane, Chief Financial Officer; and Kathleen Bregel, Deputy Clerk, Board Support.

welcome and introductions

Commr. Sullivan welcomed everyone to the 2018 State of the County and Women’s Hall of Fame Induction ceremony. He then recognized elected officials in the audience.

INVOCATION and pledge

Pastor Rick Fountain from the First Baptist Church of Tavares gave the Invocation and Sheriff Peyton Grinnell led the Pledge of Allegiance.

hurricane michael local response update

Sheriff Grinnell recognized the first responders who had provided relief and recovery efforts for the Florida Panhandle after Hurricane Michael. He shared that it was an honor to be able to help other counties within the state during their state of emergency and relayed how proud he was of the great job the Lake County responders had done.

Commr. Sullivan also thanked the first responders for their service and for answering the call to duty.

2018 women’s hall of fame

Commr. Sullivan remarked how the Lake County Women’s Hall of Fame inductees were fabulous individuals and that their contributions to Lake County were truly amazing.

Commr. Campione mentioned what an honor it was to be able to participate in this ceremony and the induction of Ms. Mabel Norris Reese to the Lake County Women’s Hall of Fame. She commented that in 1995, the Lake County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) created the Lake County Women’s Hall of Fame in order to recognize those who had made significant achievements within the county in the fields of art, agriculture, business, community service, environment, government, healthcare, humanities, philanthropy, science and education. She relayed that the women inducted into the Woman’s Hall of Fame had been nominated by friends, relatives and residents who admired and respected the great works of the nominee and the impact they had made to local history. She said that today they were honoring the late Ms. Mabel Norris Reese who was a civil rights activist, journalist, editor, and the owner of the Mount Dora Topic Newspaper. She stated that Ms. Reese’s induction to the Women’s Hall of Fame was something that the community could be proud of because it signaled an understanding of the integral role that she played in Lake County’s history. She relayed that Ms. Reese stood up for what she believed in and that citizens within the county were better because of her bravery, perseverance, selflessness, and sacrifice. She reported that Ms. Reese was an outspoken critic of social injustice and racism in Lake County between the mid-1940s and 1960 until she was forced to flee from her home due to persecution and harassment. She said that Ms. Reese wrote of the false accusations of the Groveland Four and was credited with helping commute the death sentence for one of these young men, was publicly critical of Sheriff Willis McCall, championed the case of the Platt Family who were denied attendance at a City of Mount Dora school, and reported for a decade on the case of Jesse Daniels who was a disabled man wrongly jailed before being exonerated. She indicated that Ms. Reese’s editorials were prominently featured in two books written by the Pulitzer Prize-winning author Gilbert King and that Mr. King commented on her nomination to the Lake County Women’s Hall of Fame with the following: “To my mind, this is an excellent and entirely deserving honor to bestow upon a woman of great integrity and principle. Despite her reporting on Martin Luther King, Jr. in St. Augustine in 1964, which earned her awards and great recognition, Mabel believed that her journalism in Lake County was the work she was most proud of. In my opinion, there is much in Mabel that Lake County can be proud of and she is entirely deserving of this nomination.” Commissioner Campione described that to her personally, Ms. Reese stood for truth, justice, decency and tremendous courage. She said that Ms. Reese exposed wrongdoing and fought to make things right and that her writings and actions were an important part of Lake County history. She reported that Ms. Reese opposed unjust institutions, a powerful local politician, and a system that needed to be changed, and while change did not happen immediately, Ms. Reese used her abilities and skills as a journalist to shine a light on these injustices which ultimately led to their correction over time, progress in the county and equal protection under the law. She concluded that Ms. Mabel Norris Reese exemplified traits that should be strived for on a daily basis and that the county will forever be grateful for her courage and her sacrifice. She then presented the induction award to Ms. Cindy Erickson, the granddaughter of Ms. Reese.

Ms. Erickson relayed that the quote that most reminded her of her grandmother was that “well behaved women rarely make history.” She said that her grandmother lived that quote every day and that as a teacher, she encouraged her students to believe in themselves and not to limit what they can do. She remarked that her grandmother was a role model to her and led her to believe she could accomplish whatever she wanted. She said she was proud to be Ms. Reese’s granddaughter and thanked the BCC for the honor and recognition of her grandmother.

State of the county presentation

Commr. Sullivan introduced the 2018 State of the County presentation, “A Spirit of Service,” and remarked how that theme was true throughout the county this year. He noted that the video reflected how volunteers, first responders, and County staff worked hard every day to make Lake County a great place to live, work, and raise a family.

The video started with Commissioner Sullivan reporting that during this time last year, the county was working to overcome the difficult and challenging period following the devastation of Hurricane Irma and that the Lake County Sheriff’s Office, municipal law enforcement officers, fire rescue and emergency services responded to the needs of residents suffering under the impacts of that devastating storm. He stated that these men and women are the heart and soul of the county and exemplify what the county stands for such as extending a helping hand to a neighbor in need, service to the community, stewardship, volunteerism and perseverance. He remarked that the BCC continued to further its goals and objectives to improve the county by enhancing public safety, attracting businesses, and planning for smart growth in order to maintain the quality of life in Lake County. The video then showed Mr. Jeff Cole, County Manager, who reported that the county had a very productive year and was able to reduce county expenditures in the budget for the second year in a row while also replenishing $10 million that was spent over the past year on Hurricane Irma recovery; additionally, Mr. Thomas Carpenter, Director for the Office of Emergency Management, shared that Lake County staff had the privilege to assist with providing humanitarian aid and the basic public safety services such as emergency communications, search and rescue, fire suppression, law enforcement and judicial services to the Florida Panhandle after the devastation of Hurricane Michael destroyed homes, businesses and local infrastructure. Mr. Cole then reported in the video that it had been an exciting year for public safety in Lake County, noting that the Office of Fire Rescue was already a department within the County and that the Office of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) was now a part of the County as well. He said that this helped to increase coordination between the two entities and would create efficiencies, save taxpayer dollars, and provide improved services moving forward. The video showcased these 2018 accomplishments for the Office of Public Safety: Fire Station 14 was dedicated in Altoona; Fire Rescue offered cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training; the Office of Emergency Management and the National Weather Service provided SKYWARN training; the BCC approved funding to replace public safety radios for first responders; Lake County firefighters created the Rescue Me calendar to benefit the Lake County Animal Shelter; and Engine 13 was named in honor of Mr. Roy Hunter. The video then reported that the BCC led a forum of stakeholders to discuss homelessness solutions, participated in the grand opening for the next section of the Wekiva Parkway which would have a tremendous economic impact to Lake County, and that Commissioner Campione and Commissioner Parks were inducted into office on November 20, 2018. Mr. Cole then remarked in the video that in 2018, the County advanced their forward momentum in tourism and economic development with a new director continuing to develop working relationships with education partners in order to further grow the workforce in Lake County, attract new businesses, and grow existing businesses. He said that one example of a capital project which used tourism dollars was the athletic center being developed at Hickory Point Park in the City of Tavares. He noted that this was a great opportunity to bring in athletes, their families and visitors from around the country into the county. The video showed these other Agency for Economic Prosperity initiatives for the year: Partners for Success; Fishing League Worldwide tournaments; the Office of Visit Lake branding at the Florida Welcome Centers; and the revamping of the Lake County Fairgrounds and Event Center website to improve customer service. The video then featured Mr. Bobby Bonilla, Director for the Office of Parks and Trails, who said that his office was constantly striving to improve the county’s recreation system in order to meet the diverse needs of residents and visitors; additionally, the county celebrated the grand opening of the Pine Meadows Conservation Area, the groundbreaking of the South Lake Regional Park, and received $1.5 million for the Lake May Reserve. The video relayed these other Lake County accomplishments for 2018: Ms. Laura Sobbott Ross was chosen as the Lake County Library System’s first poet laureate; a 12,000 square foot library was being constructed in the City of Fruitland Park; LakeXpress added four Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant bus stops and improved Route 4 in the City of Leesburg; a fertilizer ordinance was adopted by the BCC; Lake County Solid Waste was granted funding for its bear-resistant garbage cart program; Lake County Mosquito and Aquatic Management teamed with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission to treat Little Lake Harris for hydrilla; the Leesburg Resource Center opened; the BCC proclaimed October 1-5, 2018 as National 4-H Week in recognition of student 4-H members who won national awards; and the Office of Procurement Services was given the Award of Excellence in public procurement. Mr. Cole then reported in the video that the County took over operations for the Lake County Animal Shelter in January 2017 and that by January 2018, the shelter had achieved a no-kill status as part of the County’s commitment to the community; furthermore, he said a new animal shelter would be built in 2019. The video then showed Mr. Jim Kovacs, Director for the Office of Human Resources and Risk Management, who remarked that 50 volunteers were honored for over 19,000 hours of service at a value of about $154,000, noting that they volunteered at libraries, the animal shelter, parks and other offices and that they provided a great assistance in delivering high quality customer service to the residents of Lake County. The video concluded with Mr. Cole acknowledging that the productiveness of 2018 was a result of committed and dedicated County staff who are always focused on providing great customer service.

intermission and refreshments

Commr. Sullivan thanked the County staff, other Commissioners, the Constitutional Officers, and first responders for their dedication to the county and for upholding the quality of life for Lake County. He then recessed the meeting for approximately thirty minutes and invited everyone in attendance to enjoy refreshments in the rotunda.

Agenda update

Mr. Cole stated that since the agenda had been originally published, Tab 16 was added to the consent agenda at Commissioner Campione’s request and Tab 17 was added to the consent agenda at the County Attorney’s request.

Commr. Campione asked for Tab 16 to be pulled from the consent agenda for discussion.

election of chairman and vice chairman

Commr. Sullivan remarked that he supported the tradition of the Vice Chairman becoming the Chairman and he also recommended that Commissioner Breeden take the Vice Chairman position. He thanked his fellow Commissioners for the opportunity to serve as Chairman for the last two years.

Commr. Breeden commented that she appreciated Commissioner Sullivan’s steadiness and professionalism in the Chairman position.

Commr. Campione echoed the same sentiments, relayed what an excellent job Commissioner Sullivan had done as the Chairman, and said that he had faithfully served the county and upheld the Board’s commitment to all their initiatives and events.

On a motion by Commr. Blake, seconded by Commr. Parks, and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved Commissioner Campione as the new Chairman of the Board and Commissioner Breeden as the new Vice Chairman of the Board.

Minutes approval

On a motion by Commr. Sullivan, seconded by Commr. Breeden, and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved the Minutes of October 9, 2018 (Regular Meeting) as presented.

citizen question and comment period

Mr. Vance Jochim, a concerned citizen, suggested that the Board consider reducing the number of Lake County regulations, create a process where residents could recommend ones they would like to see eliminated, and consider deleting some of the “shall” statements within the Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan).

Mr. Cole noted that staff had been proactive in evaluating regulations and that they would continue to do so.

Commr. Campione added that the State of Florida required the “shall” statements in the Comp Plan.

Mr. Travis Whigham, a Lake County resident, mentioned that he was seeking support and funding for a program he had created which would assist first responders in rescuing victims.

Mr. Cole directed Mr. Whigham to provide his contact information to Mr. John Molenda, Assistant County Manager, who was present in the meeting in order to connect with him.

CLERK OF the circuit COURT and comptroller’s CONSENT AGENDA

On a motion by Commr. Parks, seconded by Commr. Blake, and carried unanimously by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved the Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller’s Consent Agenda, Items 1 through 3, as follows:

List of Warrants

Request to acknowledge receipt of the list of warrants paid prior to this meeting, pursuant to Chapter 136.06 (1) of the Florida Statutes, which shall be incorporated into the Minutes as attached Exhibit A and filed in the Board Support Division of the Clerk's Office.

City of Minneola Ordinances

Request to acknowledge receipt from the City of Minneola the adoption package for Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ordinance 2017-29 DEO# 18-01 ESR for 8.29 acres for parcel 36-21-25-0001-000-00400. Also included is Ordinance 2017-28 for the annexation and rezoning of the parcel.

Lands Available List

Request to acknowledge receipt of property placed on the Lands Available List. Lake County has until February 17, 2019 to purchase property from the Lands Available List before it is available to the public.

COUNTY MANAGER’S CONSENT agenda

On a motion by Commr. Breeden, seconded by Commr. Sullivan and carried unanimously by a vote of 5-0, the Board approved the Consent Agenda, Tabs 3 through 12, plus Tab 17, pulling Tab 16 for discussion as follows:

COUNTY ATTORNEY

Request approval to have a Closed Session of the Board of County Commissioners on December 18, 2018, to discuss pending litigation. There is no fiscal impact.

PUBLIC SAFETY AND COMPLIANCE

Public Safety

Request approval to standardize the use of high fidelity adult and pediatric patient simulation products (mannequins) through CAE Healthcare, Inc. (Sarasota, FL), authorize the Office of Procurement Services to issue purchase orders for related goods and services as needed, and authorization for the Chairman to execute any necessary contract documentation. The fiscal year 2019 estimated impact is $35,000.00 (expenditure).

Request approval to apply for and accept funding from the Florida Department of Health’s Emergency Medical Services Grant for enhancement of the County’s emergency medical system, and authorization for the Chairman to execute the grant application and supporting Resolution 2018-166. The fiscal impact is up to $34,167.00 (revenue).

INFRASTRUCTURE AND INTERNAL SUPPORT SERVICES

Public Works

Request approval to utilize the Vista (Apopka, FL) and Deland Landfills for the disposal of treated lumber, furniture, yard waste, and other related class 3 materials, and authorization for the Office of Procurement Services to execute all related implementing documents. The estimated fiscal impact is $65,000.00 (expenditure).

Request approval of contracts under Request for Statement of Qualifications 18-0929 to Pennoni Associates, Inc. (Winter Haven, FL) and Traffic Engineering Data Solutions, Inc. (DeBary, FL) for on-call transportation and traffic engineering services. The estimated fiscal impact is $135,000.00 (expenditure).

Request approval to apply for and accept a Lake County Water Authority Stormwater Treatment Grant to design and construct a linear stormwater treatment pond in the remnant canal located at Marsh Park on Lake Yale in Eustis, and authorization for the Chairman to execute any supporting documentation. The fiscal impact is $125,000.00 ($62,500.00 in grant revenue and $62,500.00 in Stormwater MSTU funds). Commission District 4.

Request approval of:

1. An agreement and supporting Resolution 2018-167 with the Florida Department of Transportation for the right of way acquisition services for Old U.S. Highway 441/County Road 19A at the Eudora Road roundabout project (FPN #437464-2-44-01).
2. Unanticipated Revenue Resolution 2018-168 to amend the fiscal year 2019 budget to receive the grant funds

The fiscal impact is $200,000.00 ($100,000.00 in grant funding, and $100,000 in Sales Tax funding). Commission District 4.

Request approval:
1.  To apply for a Florida Department of Transportation Drive IT Home grant for the Keep Lake Beautiful Program.
2.  For the County Manager to execute any associated documents if awarded.
The estimated fiscal impact is $16,000.00 (Revenue).

Request approval of an amendment to the Impact Fee Credits Agreement with Cemex Construction Materials Florida LLC (CEMEX) for improvements to Schofield Road in Clermont, which would require CEMEX to complete the final plans and specifications for the improvements on or before 18 months from the performance or occurrence of all Approval Conditions. There is no fiscal impact. Commission District 2.

COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICE

Community Services

Request approval to award term and supply contract 19-0903 to Consumer Debt Counselors, Inc. (Winter Park, FL) for homebuyer orientation services in association with the County's housing services programs to be provided on an as-needed basis. The estimated annual fiscal impact is $18,316.00 (expenditure).

Library Services

Request approval of:

1. An Interlocal Agreement with the City of Clermont to provide funding to support operation of the County’s Cooper Memorial Library.
2. A Memorandum of Understanding with Lake-Sumter State College for expanded hours at Cooper Memorial Library, as supported by the City of Clermont.

The estimated fiscal impact is $76,920.00 (revenue). Commission District 2.

ISBA amendment relating to schofield road

Commr. Campione mentioned that she had asked for this item to be on the agenda in order to address any questions and eliminate any possible confusion. She recapped that the current Interlocal Boundary Service Agreement (ISBA) provisions provide that if a city annexes over 50 percent of an area adjoining a county road then the road would become the responsibility of the city and would place the road under their jurisdiction. She said that considering the large expense that Cemex Construction Materials Florida, LLC had put into the construction of Schofield Road as well as the amount of time spent by County staff on this road, she felt that area should be treated differently than what would normally occur with the ISBA, and that road should remain under the jurisdiction of the County. She relayed that this amendment would last through the duration of the ISBA as well as any extensions to it. She then asked the County Attorney if this would have to become an ordinance.

Ms. Melanie Marsh, County Attorney, replied that was correct and noted that the City of Clermont would have to adopt it as an ordinance and then it would need to come back to the BCC to be adopted as an ordinance to amend the ISBA.

Commr. Campione added that since this was the first annexation and it was adjacent to Schofield Road, it was important to address at this time and to confirm that all parties were in agreement and had the same expectations.

On a motion by Commr. Sullivan, seconded by Commr. Parks and carried unanimously by a vote of 5-0, the Board approved the amendment to the Interlocal Boundary Service Agreement with the City of Clermont relating to Schofield Road.

wolf branch innovation district presentation

Mr. Brandon Matulka, Director of the Agency for Economic Prosperity, mentioned that this was the quarterly update on the Wolf Branch Innovation District and would be presented by Dr. Richard Levey, with Levey Consulting, LLC, who was the consultant on this project. He relayed that the previous update on this project was presented at the August 21, 2018 BCC meeting and he recapped that Lake County and the City of Mount Dora were working collaboratively together with the consultant to develop both a strategic and implementation plan for the Wolf Branch Innovation District as a future mixed use employment center just east of existing downtown Mount Dora near State Road (S.R.) 46 and the Wekiva Parkway extension. He noted that the Mount Dora City Manager and Economic Director had been great partners with the County on this project and were present in the audience.

Dr. Levey mentioned that at his previous presentation, he had provided an update that included the findings of the strategy report and he said that the next work order would be creating the comprehensive implementation plan, noting that he would be covering part of that today with other updates following in the future. He emphasized that throughout this process, there was an ongoing dialogue regarding employer recruitment with the objective to create jobs for this area. He stated that he would be discussing these four elements from the strategy report: protecting the assets and quality of the location; land supply concerns regarding too much regional office space; the character of the types of uses; and the creation of a higher quality built environment. He displayed a map of the study area location, noting that U.S. 441 was on the east, Wolf Branch Road was on the north, the Orange County line was on the south, and the edge of the joint planning area (JPA) boundary with the City of Mount Dora was on the east. He then showed a planning area by ownership map, noting that understanding ownership patterns assisted in developing a strategy. He explained that a 2013 market study identified that approximately 500 acres was needed for employment uses through the year 2040, and he reminded the Board that it was important when planning to allow for flexibility for the market demand and to plan for an acreage somewhat above that; therefore, he relayed that using a 1.5 to 1.75 multiplier factor, which he noted would typically be used for this type of use, meant that approximately 754 to 870 acres was probably a good target for this area and was used for today’s analysis. He showed the current amount of land that was designated Regional Office Future Land Use (FLU) for this area, noting that it was about a 1,696 gross acreage and a 1,328 net acreage, which was well above the 754 to 870 acres target range. He explained that as a result of this over supply, they recommended shrinking the Regional Office FLU area to a net acreage of approximately 850 acreage. He then displayed a slide comparing the existing Regional Office FLU map to the proposed reduction in the size of the Regional Office FLU, noting that the City of Mount Dora referred to it as an Employment Center Land Use designation. He remarked that in order to achieve this reduced Regional Office FLU area, they needed to re-plan some of the properties and take them out of the Employment Center Land Use designation and place them into another land use. He then identified on the map the various properties in that area that would change to land use categories such as residential, landfill, and conventional commercial. He recapped that the proposed area captured all four corners of S.R. 46 and Round Lake Road as well as some of the larger tracts of land west of Round Lake Road that were conducive for an employment center development. He relayed that within the new proposed boundary for the employment center there was an existing approved Planned Unit Development (PUD), Summerlake-Grace, which was located in the extreme southeast corner of the study area, had four million square feet of non-residential development and currently had no considerable access to S.R. 46 or Round Lake Road. He implied that this lack of access needed to be addressed and he suggested a phasing of the infrastructure for the employment center. He said that they would require the Summerlake-Grace PUD property owner to provide adequate access and felt that it should not come out to Round Lake Road since most of that corridor was residential in nature. He stated they wanted to orient access from the employment center north to S.R. 46 or southeast to County Road (C.R.) 437. He indicated that the Summerlake-Grace PUD phasing mechanism would ensure that the infrastructure was adequate, timed and staged to accommodate the impacts of the development, and utilized a trip threshold approach so that future development would only proceed if there was adequate access to the north via S.R. 46; additionally, if the development’s trip threshold was exceeded, then the PUD developer must provide access to the south, which he noted would then give through access. He summarized that this plan desired and accomplished these goals: reduced the office acreage; protected the character of the area by identifying a natural buffer between the rural transition areas and the employment center boundary; recommended a secondary road system to increase mobility and interconnectivity, mostly provided by the private land owners; and distinguished the area by creating a multi-purpose trail system that capitalized on the existing natural resources of the area. He concluded by identifying the next steps of developing consensus between the City and the County on the proposed conceptual master plan, reviewing the Comp Plan and zoning categories, engaging the property owners with a potential public meeting in early 2019, and then reporting results to the City Council and County Commission; furthermore, they would provide the future deliverables of the capital improvement plan and budget, the annexation strategy, and the design guidelines.

Commr. Sullivan suggested that the Lake County Office of Parks and Trails and the Public Works Department become involved in this venture as well since the County had internally considered various road options and trails.

Dr. Levey mentioned that he was partnering with GAI Consultants who were also working on the parks and trails master plan for the City of Mount Dora and he believed that collaboration with the County had already taken place. He commented that his company was working alongside the City parks and trails staff to ensure a seamless experience and that he would make sure the County staff was also engaged.

Commr. Campione remarked that the Lake-Sumter Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) should be involved in discussions as well since a possible key component to the Wekiva Trail may rest with the MPO assisting in receiving funds. She thanked Dr. Levey for the progress that had been made since the last meeting.

Dr. Levey relayed that the property owners of the 73 parcels that would be re-planned would be notified.

Commr. Campione asked if the parcels on the south side near S.R. 46 were transitioning back to commercial FLU.

Dr. Levey replied that the consensus was there was a need for smaller scale, neighborhood commercial property in that area. He reiterated the focus was on creating a high standard of design in order to have the character and quality of development desired for this area.

Mr. Cole shared that Dr. Levey would be scheduled to present another update to the Board in approximately three to four months.

regular agenda

landscaping standards and tree protection ordinance

Mr. Tim McClendon, Director for the Office of Planning and Zoning, relayed that the current landscape ordinance was adopted in 2008 and that the most recent update to the ordinance included the Florida Water Star^SM irrigation requirements. He said that currently trees larger than three inches in diameter were considered protected trees, which meant they required a tree removal permit in order to be removed. He stated that the County presently allowed trees to be installed within the right-of-way, that all farms were exempt from landscape regulations, and that there were five landscape buffer types with each having their own unique planning requirements per 100 linear feet. He relayed that for a tree to be designated as a heritage tree required formal BCC action and that when a protected tree was removed, it had to be replaced at 50 percent of the total number of caliper inches removed; furthermore, if it was not replaced, it would have to be mitigated. He recalled that based on Board direction at their March 2018 strategies session, staff was tasked with simplifying the landscape code as well as reducing regulations where possible. He relayed these two significant changes being proposed: identifying what is a protected tree and changing it from three inches to eight inches in diameter, noting that this would benefit citizens and bring Lake County in line with surrounding counties; and exempting a developed residential lot from needing a tree removal permit, with the provisions that there is a developed home on the property and that the lot has the minimum number of trees required. He stated that staff was also proposing the following: to exempt all planted pine tree farms from needing a tree removal permit, noting this change was language from the ordinance in place prior to 2008; the addition of Florida Friendly Landscaping^TM required plantings; the prohibition of canopy trees being installed within utility easements; the prohibition of trees being located within the county right-of-way, noting there was a small change on the errata sheet which provided that if a citizen wanted to replace a tree within the right-of-way, they would need a right-of-way utilization permit; to enlarge the commercial building perimeter landscape buffer to eight feet with trees planted as far away from the building as possible; and a change to the heritage tree designation process to make it administrative rather than requiring BCC formal action. He remarked that staff had thoroughly reviewed the current landscape code to find efficiencies and streamline where possible while preserving the aesthetic component and integrity of the code, that there were no changes to the landscape buffer materials or the width of the buffers, that the proposed changes were reviewed by landscape architects, that the proposed changes were consistent with the directions given by the BCC at their annual strategies workshop, and that the Planning and Zoning Board recommended unanimous approval of this ordinance. He reiterated that the biggest change was changing protected trees from three inches to eight inches, which would align Lake County with surrounding jurisdictions, and that the biggest win was that homeowners would no longer have to obtain a tree removal permit in order to remove trees on their own lots. He summarized that the requested action was approval to advertise this ordinance.

Commr. Breeden asked if this new ordinance would mean that homeowners would not be required to obtain a tree removal permit as long as they maintained the required number of trees on their lot and Mr. McClendon confirmed that was correct and reiterated that if the property owner went below the required number of trees, they would have to get a tree removal application and replace or mitigate any removed trees.

Commr. Campione asked if trees being replaced within the right-of-way could be canopy trees and Mr. McClendon referenced the last sentence of section 9.01.06 on the errata sheet which stated “canopy trees shall be planted a minimum of eight feet from public sidewalks and curbs.”

Ms. Marsh noted that there were approximately seven to eight types of trees that were permissible for the right-of-way; however, she was not certain if those qualified as canopy trees. She mentioned that if they were not canopy trees, staff would adjust that language.

Commr. Breeden requested a list of approved trees for planting within a right-of-way, which staff later provided to the Board.

Commr. Campione also inquired if the trees and plants currently allowed to be utilized only referenced the Florida Friendly Landscaping and did not include the native plant list.

Mr. McClendon responded that it was not just the native plant list but was also the Florida Grades and Nursery Standards 2015, Florida Number One or better, which was adopted by reference from the Florida Department of Agriculture, and he noted that any on that list could be used.

The Chairman opened the floor for public comment.

Mr. Jim Lobb, a concerned Lake County resident, remarked that after reviewing the tree ordinance, he felt that providing shade and atmosphere along streets, sidewalks and trails was well intended by the ordinance; however, he opined that using live, laurel and water oak trees as canopy trees was an issue and suggested utilizing smaller trees which would accomplish the same objectives and not be as burdensome on home owners. He also asked that setbacks and spacing be altered in order to give neighborhoods a homier atmosphere.

Ms. Lavon Silvernell, President of the Lake Beautyberry Chapter for the Florida Native Plant Society, commented that according to the Lake County plant list, the definition of a canopy tree was one that has a mature height of 31 feet or greater. She suggested that the ordinance should include some definitions and that if the ordinance was going to reference Florida Friendly Landscaping, then the County’s list of approved trees should be compatible with that. She also felt it was important to keep the term native plants within the ordinance, to place a list of accepted trees on the County website, and to increase the number of trees required per buildable lot as the size of the lot increases. She concluded that she supported the right for occupied land owners to manage trees on their property without permitting and for the County to maintain oversight of what is planted.

Ms. Susan Fetter, a concerned citizen, encouraged the Board to consider Ms. Silvernell’s recommendations and opined that the five acre residential requirement for the number of required trees was too large and that it should be reduced to two or three acres. She also suggested adding pollinator plants to the plant list since bees were important to the environment.

Ms. Sherry Chester, a resident who lived near Lake Harris, opined that the current proposed ordinance changes did not maintain the integrity of the existing landscape code and were not in the county’s best interest. She felt that Lake County was allowing too much development, was experiencing environmental degradation, was encroaching into the Green Swamp, and was undermining the quality of life in the county.

There being no one else who wished to address the Board regarding this matter, the Chairman closed the floor for public comment.

Commr. Parks shared that he had an educational background in environmental science and had a personal interest in this topic. He remarked that he often heard residents expressing two diverse thoughts with some having a desire for permitting to be streamlined and others concerned with the amount of growth in the county and its affect in maintaining the county’s identity of Real Florida, Real Close. He commented that his desire was to balance both sides and he made the following suggestions for the ordinance: to add definitions at the beginning of the ordinance; that letter G in section 9.01.02 should be two acres as that would be a good compromise and would be similar to surrounding counties; that every plant on the county plant list should be Florida Friendly; and that number three in section 9.01.05 where it said two thirds, should change to all plants required to be Florida Friendly Landscaping, noting this was a large list of options.

Commr. Breeden asked if this two thirds percentage referred to just trees or all landscaping and Mr. McClendon replied it was all landscaping.

Commr. Blake was concerned about how this would impact the average citizen.

Commr. Campione suggested that staff consider what local nursery growers were growing and how these changes might impact them.

Commr. Parks remarked that if this was an impact to local nurseries, the Board could possibly delay these changes for two years. He commented that he felt that the larger buffers that buffer commercial development from residential should be 80 percent native plants and all Florida Friendly Landscaping. He clarified that this was not a part of what was being proposed at this meeting but it was something he wanted staff to consider. He suggested that a list of potential trees be added to the internal landscaping in parking lots section, especially since they were striking live oak trees; additionally, he opined that in number five of that same section, that a palm tree was not equal to a canopy tree and that staff should reconsider that change.

Commr. Campione opined that canopy trees in parking lot areas did not thrive nor provide much shade and Commissioner Blake added that they can be expensive when hurricanes hit. Commissioner Campione noted that the costs to removing downed trees and branches from Hurricane Irma was what prompted these discussions. She suggested including smaller trees as an option.

Ms. Marsh remarked that the list of trees allowed within the right-of-way was just handed to the Board and Commissioner Campione commented that the trees on this list were ones that the Lake County Public Works Department felt would not create damage to the sidewalks or pavement.

Commr. Parks indicated that within letter C of section 9.01.08, he preferred it to remain 15 feet instead of changing it to 30 feet. He also suggested that there be a public awareness campaign regarding these changes, similar to what the County did for the fertilizer ordinance.

Commr. Blake thanked Mr. McClendon and his staff for their efforts on this proposed ordinance. He indicated that he supported the proposed changes as drafted and moved for approval.

Commr. Campione indicated that this was moving on to advertise and Commissioner Breeden remarked that the motion did not include the errata sheet.

Commr. Blake amended his motion for approval of the ordinance with the proposed changes to include the errata sheet.

Commr. Breeden asked what category pine trees were under since they were not considered canopy nor ornamental trees and suggested they be considered as an option for tree requirements.

Commr. Campione remarked that pine trees worked well as a natural large buffer, noting that The Villages had areas where they used pine trees as buffers. She supported them being considered.

Commr. Blake’s motion failed due to lack of a second.

Commr. Sullivan remarked that he felt Commissioner Blake’s motion was on the right track; however, he opined that staff should incorporate into the ordinance the new information presented in this meeting. He proposed the ordinance move forward with staff directed to make the recommended changes suggested in this meeting. He added that this was just for approval to advertise and that changes could be made at the public hearing.

Ms. Marsh noted that changes could be made at the public hearing but suggested if there were going to be significant changes, that they be discussed in advance rather than the day of the public hearing. She stated that it might be a better option to have staff make the changes presented today and then have the ordinance be brought back to the Board for another review opportunity before it was advertised.

Commr. Campione said that she preferred to move forward with protecting existing residents that would otherwise have to obtain a tree removal permit, although she agreed that it would probably take one more meeting to work through the changes and then the Board could vote to advertise and move for an adoption hearing.

Commr. Parks stated that while he had suggestions for changes, he agreed that this ordinance should move forward in order to assist residents so they did not need a tree removal permit. He reiterated that educating residents was important in order for them to know what the minimum requirements were and when they would need a permit.

Commr. Breeden opined that the Board should delay.

Commr. Sullivan amended his original motion to include postponing until staff could make the proposed changes and then bring the ordinance back before the Board for approval to advertise.

Commr. Campione clarified that the ordinance could be brought back at the next BCC meeting with changes and the Board would vote at that meeting whether to move forward with advertising.

Commr. Blake asked which changes Commissioner Sullivan was including in his motion.

Commr. Sullivan replied that he supported the idea of smaller trees and was in agreement to simplify where possible. He said that he also liked the idea of the landscaping being Florida Friendly Landscaping and was in agreement with the 66 percentage requirement for those.

Commr. Breeden asked for the list of trees that would be considered canopy or ornamental.

Commr. Blake opined that most residents enjoy trees on their property and that this ordinance would help to make it easier for citizens. Commissioner Campione agreed and said that this would give residents the opportunity to more easily maintain their property.

Commr. Sullivan withdrew his motion.

Commr. Campione commented that postponing would give staff and the Board the opportunity to consider the different options and explore the list of Florida Friendly Landscaping and how it related to local nurseries.

Commr. Breeden remarked that some of the day’s discussion was around landscaping but explained that this ordinance was referencing trees and confirmed with Mr. McClendon that other landscaping plants and regulations could be addressed in the future.

Commr. Campione added that she would like to see a way to incentivize keeping and incorporating natural tree lines and existing vegetation areas for new residential developments.

Mr. Cole asked if this ordinance could be postponed until January 2019 rather than the next December meeting in order to give staff time to gather information and make changes.

On a motion by Commr. Parks, seconded by Commr. Breeden and carried unanimously by a vote of 5-0, the Board approved postponing the approval of the request to advertise an ordinance amending Appendix E, Lake County Land Development Regulations Section 9.01.00 “Landscaping Standards” and 9.02.00 “Tree Protection” by streamlining existing landscape code and exempting developed single family lots from needing a tree removal permit until their meeting in January 2019 in order to allow staff to make the changes discussed in this meeting and to have further Board conversation regarding this topic.

recess and reassembly

The Chairman called a recess at 11:48 a.m. for 10 minutes.

transportation impact fee categories

Mr. Fred Schneider, County Engineer, recapped that at their November 6, 2018 meeting, the Board approved an ordinance to create four transportation impact fee benefit districts and the associated fees which would take effect on February 11, 2019; additionally, the Board requested an evaluation of existing proposed impact fee categories and waivers for residential development within infill areas of the county. He displayed a chart of the new impact fees for the four districts becoming effective in February 2019, noting that there were four residential and seven non-residential categories. He explained that the impact fees would be 70 percent of the full rate for the south district, 13 percent for the central and north central district, and 39 percent for the northeast Wekiva district. He mentioned that the spring of 2019 would be the earliest that any new additional transportation impact fee categories that the Board might add could go into effect. He also remarked that fee rates would be updated with trip generation data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in the 2017 Trip Generation Manual, which would slightly affect the fee rates. He then showed several slides with these potential new categories and the corresponding fee rates: assisted living and nursing home categories under housing, which he noted would currently be charged at the lodging category rate; hospital, private school, and house of worship categories under professional services, which he noted would currently be charged at the public/institutional category rate; veterinary clinic and medical office categories under professional services, which would currently be charged at the office category rate; dividing the retail category into five new categories of general retail small, general retail large, convenience retail, gas station, and full service restaurant; and dividing the warehouse category under the industry category into warehouse passive and warehouse active.

Commr. Campione questioned the medical office fee increasing and commented that was a great need in the community with medical being one of the targeted industries for the county.

Commr. Breeden noted that it was significantly higher than the hospital fee.

Mr. Bill Oliver, Principal Engineer working with Kittelson & Associates, replied that medical office buildings that turn over multiple clients throughout the day generate more trips per thousand square feet than a hospital. He explained that the trip generation rate for a hospital was 1.7 trips per 1,000 square feet while a medical office was 34.8 trips per 1,000 square feet, noting this information was from the tenth addition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual.

Mr. Schneider added that hospitals have larger square footage in their buildings and end up paying higher impact fees due to this.

Commr. Campione asked if a surgery center would fall under the hospital or medical office category as it did not necessarily fit directly into either one but probably had lower trip generation than a medical office.

Mr. Oliver responded that it would depend on if it was outpatient surgery or if the facility had beds where patients might stay overnight or multiple days, noting that was one of the deciding factors that distinguished if a facility was a medical office building, clinic or hospital.

Commr. Blake asked if the medical office category fee rates were comparable per square foot to Orange County and Mr. Oliver replied that he had not reviewed that county’s ordinance; however, he said that transportation studies generally rely on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual.

Commr. Breeden asked about the full service restaurant category and if there would be a distinction between a chain restaurant verses an independent one as she was concerned the fee rate would deter an independent from establishing a unique restaurant.

Mr. Oliver replied that the restaurant industry was changing and contained a variety of levels of service; furthermore, he expressed the need to keep the fee schedule simplified with the desire to break out fast food restaurants from full service ones.

Commr. Breeden asked Mr. Matulka if he had concerns that any of these category fee rates would have a negative impact on economic development.

Mr. Matulka responded that he had been a part of the discussions and that there were not necessarily any issues that would deter development, noting that the goal was to make sure it was fair.

Mr. Schneider commented that they tried to address concerns that the Board had identified, such as locally owned restaurants or businesses, and remarked that many of those types of establishments would utilize existing buildings or an urban area already set up. He explained that the Lake County Code also allowed for alternative impact fee studies where the County would evaluate if someone did not feel they fit within the designated category.

Commr. Blake remarked that the convenience retail for the south district seemed very high and asked what the average square footage was for a chain type convenience retail store.

Mr. Schneider replied it was approximately 5,000 to 6,000 square feet.

Commr. Campione asked if staff had compared it to Orange County as she felt that these stores would be used to paying that level of fee.

Mr. Schneider added that the convenience fee in the 2006 transportation impact fee ordinance was higher than these current proposed rates.

Commr. Blake opined that this rate would deter locally owned convenience stores and encourage larger, corporate chains in the county.

Commr. Campione thought that locally owned convenience stores would utilize existing buildings and not have to pay the impact fees.

Mr. Schneider asked if the convenience retail category referred to convenience stores with gas pumps.

Mr. Oliver confirmed that was correct and then added that the convenience category with gas pumps fee for Orange County was $20,400 per 1,000 square feet. He added that for Lake County, convenience stores without gas pumps would be placed under general retail.

Commr. Campione remarked that convenience store gas stations also generate a higher level of traffic.

Commr. Blake commented that often gas stations do not generate a trip but are a stop along the way to another location.

Mr. Oliver stated that condition was addressed and he explained that the fee was based on the three variables of number of trips, length of those trips, and what percentage of those trips were new trips. He elaborated that when studies were performed, drivers were interviewed and asked if they were going from point A to point C, would they have used this road to come to this site or did they deviate from a shorter path to get to this point and therefore added travel to the network.

Commr. Sullivan reminded the Board that these impact fees were for new construction. He stated that while he did not want to stall economic growth, he felt that the existing infrastructure needed improvements, with transportation being a large part of that. He mentioned that at the previous day’s Lake-Sumter MPO meeting, there were discussions on how transportation project costs were increasing but the revenue to fund these projects was decreasing and he opined that the Board needed to determine a way to assist with this issue. He supported moving forward with these fees and he thought that the fee percentages were correct for the areas where growth would be occurring.

Commr. Breeden reiterated her desire for Mr. Matulka to report if he noticed that higher impact fees deterred economic growth.

Commr. Campione asked if the Board’s decision was approval to advertise with the additional new categories and move ahead with drafting an ordinance.

Mr. Cole responded that the purpose of today’s Board discussion was to give staff direction for the ordinance which would still need to return to the Board as a request to advertise. He stated that this would be an item at the Board’s December 18, 2018 meeting with the public hearing in January 2019.

Commr. Campione said that the Board should reach out to the South Lake Chamber of Commerce for input and Commissioner Sullivan suggested reaching out to the Chamber Alliance of Lake County as well.

On a motion by Commr. Sullivan, seconded by Commr. Parks and carried by a vote of 4-1, the Board approved for staff to draft an ordinance with the additional transportation impact fee categories, to seek input from the various Chambers of Commerce and the Chamber Alliance of Lake County, and to present the ordinance at the next Board meeting with a request for approval to advertise.

Commr. Blake voted no.

waivers for infill development

Mr. Schneider explained that the waivers for infill development were for residential construction and that the current Ordinance 2017-25 and section 22-8 of the Lake County Code allowed for waivers of educational impact fees for single family home construction in infill development areas of the county under certain conditions, and that on October 23, 2018, the Board requested an evaluation of the ordinance to include an additional waiver for transportation impact fees. He reported that currently, educational impact fee waivers may be provided for single family home construction under the following conditions: within a plat recorded on or before June 30, 1991 which is within three miles of a city hall, within two miles walking distance of a school, and within a historic preservation district; or within a plat recorded on or before June 30, 2001 that has a dwelling unit on 80 percent or more of the lots and is also within three miles of a city hall, within two miles walking distance of a school, and within a historic preservation district. He elaborated that additional criteria in the 2017 ordinance for waivers for educational impact fees included: the lot is located within a blighted area; available school capacity; architectural requirements including construction finishes, equipment location criteria, garage doors, and driveways; and landscaping and buffer requirements. He indicated that transportation impact fee waivers for infill development required the Board to identify a funding source for the program and that the waiver criteria would mirror the requirements of the educational impact fee waiver for infill housing.

Commr. Campione relayed that she had worked on the school waiver program and mentioned that some of the criteria was included at the school board’s request since they were responsible for setting aside money for the waiver. She explained that the impact fee would remain at the 100 percent rate and that in return, the school board would set aside other funding to cover the waivers. She felt that some of these requirements could be altered for transportation purposes and could be launched as a pilot program in order to track how much participation it might have. She said that the three miles to the city hall criteria assured that it focused on existing platted lots already in urbanized areas and did not promote platting new lots; additionally, the two miles walking distance to a school was specifically to meet the school board requirement and may not be needed for transportation. She suggested using the word “or” and changing the requirement to “within three miles of a city hall or within a historic preservation district,” noting that the desired outcome was the promotion of the utilization of infill lots which then enhanced the tax base and helped to improve the surrounding area.

Commr. Parks asked if being near a transit line or stop should be added as a possible criteria and Commisioner Campione replied that lots along transit lines were not always in an urbanized area.

Commr. Breeden remarked that she liked the concept; however, since the County was just starting the new fiscal year, she would prefer to consider it for the next fiscal year in order to allow time to look for funding for the waivers.

Commr. Campione said that since the Board had been discussing the possibility of shifting some of the General Fund into transportation, this would provide a pilot program in order to monitor the results of the County promoting the development of existing lots and its subsequent effect on the tax roll. She gave the example that the County could possible designate just $200,000 towards this waiver program until that amount was depleted, then the County could track the value to the tax roll the following year with the possibility that the County was bringing in $300,000 worth of tax revenues due to the homes built on the infill lots.

Commr. Parks agreed to get the program established with the funding yet to be determined once they started the next budget discussions.

Commr. Breeden reiterated that she did not feel comfortable moving forward until funding was identified, especially since the budget was tight, and she supported making it a part of next year’s budget process.

Commr. Sullivan shared that bringing existing roads up to standard should be a priority, and he noted that it might take some general fund amounts to accomplish that. He opined that this program should wait until next year and agreed with a possible cap on the amount designated; however, he felt that the Board should continue to work on it since it could take time to develop and implement it.

Commr. Campione commented that the Board should also consider how this would impact local builders as this could have a positive impact for them since they are the ones who tend to build on infill lots. She encouraged starting this program so that as transportation impact fees increase, there would already be a mechanism for local builders to take advantage of.

Commr. Parks reiterated his support for moving forward on developing this even if just a place holder with a $100,000 towards funding it. He mentioned that the Board had also discussed assistance to veterans and small businesses, which could include local builders, and encouraged considering that as part of the program.

Commr. Campione gave the example that if someone was trying to provide affordable housing and did not meet all of the requirements for the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP) funding for an impact fee waiver but met the infill requirements, this could potentially help to make the house affordable. She opined that all of these various programs supported the topics that the Board had already been discussing, such as how to make housing affordable, how to help local builders, and how to provide elderly and veteran housing. She concluded that while they might not be able to solve every issue, this may help to meet some of these needs.

Mr. Cole commented that staff would be performing some forecasting for fiscal year (FY) 2020 in January of 2019, with consideration of the FY 2020 budget starting next summer. He shared that he would be providing a list of priorities going into the FY 2020 budget process which would include a potential millage reduction, general fund funding for roads, additional funding for the Lake County Sheriff’s Office, and additional funding going into reserves. He indicated that the demands of these priorities would exceed the available revenue and that finding a way to balance that would be important, noting that the economy and property values would affect the budget. He suggested that if the Board wanted to discuss the waivers for infill development after staff had some preliminary budget numbers, then those conversations could potentially happen in January 2019.

Commr. Breeden and Commissioner Sullivan indicated support for this plan.

Commr. Campione recapped that the Board had given some direction regarding categories for the waivers and that they would revisit funding for the waivers once they got further along in the budget process. She also mentioned that the design criteria was already in place and that initially some builders were not in support of them; however, she felt that they better understood how to design with enough façade enhancements that were good for the area and achieved the goal of helping the surrounding neighborhoods and promoting those areas.

Ms. Marsh asked for clarification if the waivers for infill development were being brought back just for Board discussion when staff started to talk about the budget or was the Board’s desire to bring it back for approval to advertise in order to have the program in place.

Commr. Campione responded that only the categories for infill development were moving ahead for advertising.

Mr. Cole added that staff would probably schedule another discussion on infill waivers in late January 2019.

reports

county manager

lake county fairgrounds relocation update

Mr. Cole provided an update on the relocation of the Lake County Fairgrounds, noting that it was a joint effort between the County and the Fair Association. He explained that the fairgrounds were used for the annual spring fair put on by the Fair Association, which he noted was a separate entity from the County, and that during the rest of the year the fairgrounds was used for a variety of events and activities arranged through the County. He recapped that the Board’s approval at the October 23, 2018 meeting of an agreement with the Fair Association for the purchase of new property allowed the Fair Association to begin seeking grant funding and for County staff to begin considering site planning, which he noted would take into consideration the landfill, the wells that would need to be monitored, the proximity to the animal shelter, and the additional land that was available and recently purchased by the Board. He reported that County staff would start working with the Fair Association to develop a site plan at the end of this year or the beginning of 2019, noting that they would include emergency management staff in order to seek Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding since there was the potential for the fairgrounds facility to be an emergency shelter in the future. He relayed that staff would be presenting a site plan for Board consideration sometime in 2019.

new director for the office of procurement services

Mr. Cole introduced and welcomed Mr. Ron Falanga as the New Director for the Office of Procurement Services. He mentioned that Mr. Falanga came from Volusia County, had past experience in the banking industry, and had good visionary ideas for efficiencies and ways to save the County money.

commissioners reports

commissioner sullivan – district 1

lake-sumter metropolitan planning organization meeting

Commr. Sullivan encouraged the Commissioners to attend the Lake-Sumter MPO’s meeting the following day as there would be important discussions on legislative appropriations for projects.

Commr. Campione directed the Board to look at the Lake-Sumter MPO packet and the legislative priorities that came out of the Florida MPO Advisory Council prior to tomorrow’s meeting.

commissioner parKS – district 2

minneola city council meeting update

Commr. Parks reported that he and Commissioner Breeden attended the Minneola City Council meeting on November 8, 2018, along with other County staff. He recapped that his intent in attending was to assist with the Lake County Parks and Trails Master Plan being adopted; however, he relayed that the City Council did not approve the plan at that meeting, noting that it was discussed but had not been placed on the agenda as an action item. He said that there were still decisions to be made by the council regarding the desired use of a potential land donation to the County and whether it would be active recreation or a mix of active and passive recreation.

Commr. Campione asked if the Lake County Parks and Trails Master Plan had to be adopted by the cities in order to be effective.

Commr. Breeden responded that one of the main reasons it was important for the City of Minneola to adopt it was that it would mean that they recognized all the connections for the trails, including important ones that go through their city. She elaborated that as developments come into that area, then the City would be aware of what connections would need to be made for the trails plan and could relay that to the developer.

Mr. Cole recalled that at least two years had been spent developing the master plan in connecting with the cities and municipalities with numerous public meetings with stakeholders and the local governments. He stated that it was the County’s intent to make sure everybody’s interests were considered as part of the plan. He explained that the Board had approved the plan and therefore it would be implemented; however, by each of the cities adopting it, it accomplished what Commissioner Breeden mentioned as well as answered any questions the municipalities might have had. He relayed that by the County and the municipalities adopting the plan, it becomes one plan that interrelates for all the networks.

Commr. Parks reiterated that the City of Minneola did have a lot to consider since they were centrally located with a high volume of development and trails that intersect.

Mr. Cole shared that the direction he gave to County staff was to be available to provide any information that the City Manager might request; additionally, he relayed that the Minneola City Council directed the Minneola City Manager to move forward with coordinating with the County.

south lake task force

Commr. Parks shared that he would be suggesting at the Lake-Sumter MPO meeting the next day that the South Lake Task Force begin meeting again since he was receiving support from the South Lake cities that this was something they desired.

Commr. Sullivan explained that this task force helped to bring to the city level the many tasks addressed at the Lake-Sumter MPO meetings.

heartland to headwaters film

Commr. Parks mentioned that he had recently seen the documentary film “Heartland to Headwaters,” and indicated that it showcased many Lake County areas. He commented that the footage tracked a group traveling from the Walt Disney World location to Lake County through various wildlife remote corridors, with the intent to demonstrate connectivity while balancing the importance of nature with economic growth.

city holiday celebrations

Commr. Parks thanked the various cities for their holiday celebrations and parades and said that he had attended the one in the City of Clermont on the previous Saturday.

commissioner breeden – vice chairman and district 3

florida association of counties legislative conference

Commr. Breeden reported that the previous week was the Florida Association of Counties (FAC) Legislative Conference which had great participation and that one of the topics was on water quality.

Commr. Parks mentioned that he would share the packet from this conference with the Commissioners.

city of tavares christmas parade

Commr. Breeden said that she was in the City of Tavares Christmas parade and relayed how much she enjoyed it.

lake county students’ christmas trees

Commr. Breeden shared that there were Christmas trees which had been decorated by Lake County students at the Lake Square Mall and that they would be auctioned off as a fundraiser through December 9, 2018.

commissioner blake – district 5

city of leesburg christmas parade

Commr. Blake commented that he helped to judge the City of Leesburg’s Christmas parade on the previous Saturday, noting that he had fun and that it was well attended.

commissioner campione – chairman and district 4

keep lake beautiful meeting

Commr. Campione stated that she had participated in a Keep Lake Beautiful meeting the previous week. She reported that it was a productive meeting and that they were exploring launching an anti-litter campaign and considered various options for this.

city of eustis ice skating

Commr. Campione mentioned that the City of Eustis was hosting ice skating at Ferran Park and remarked that many of the cities were beautifully decorated for the holidays.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to be brought to the attention of the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 1:15 p.m.

__________________________________

leslie campione, chairman

ATTEST:

____________________________

Gary J. Cooney, Clerk